Search Results for "Gram Panchayat members"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Issues Notice in Service Matter Challenging Deletion of Names ...
High Court of Karnataka Allows Appeals Against Ex Parte Interim Injunction in Pr...
High Court of Karnataka Allows Revision Petition in Private Complaint Case — T...
High Court of Karnataka Allows Revision Petition in Private Complaint Case — T...

Search Results for "Gram Panchayat members"

303 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 303 result(s)

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Burial of Christian Father in Native Village Graveyard — Right to Dignified Burial Upheld Under Article 21. State Directed to Provide Police Protection Despite Opposition from Villagers.

20 Jan 2025

The appellant, Ramesh Baghel, a third-generation Christian belonging to the Mahra community, sought to bury his deceased father in the village graveya...

High Court

Karnataka High Court Quashes Executive Officer's Order Vacating Interim Stay in Gram Panchayat Construction Dispute — Petitioner's Right to Hearing Upheld Under Karnataka Panchayat Raj Act, 1993. The Court held that the Executive Officer could not vacate an interim order without affording the petitioner an opportunity of hearing, and restored the interim stay pending fresh consideration.

22 Oct 2021

The petitioner, Smt. Jyothi, claiming to be the absolute owner of house properties bearing Nos. 542/1 and 542/1A situated in Maddur, filed a writ peti...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Panchayat No-Confidence Motion Dispute — MP's Inclusion for Quorum and Vote Upheld. The Court held that the Member of Parliament representing the Union Territory is a member of the Panchayat Samiti with full voting rights, including in no-confidence motions, under the Andaman and Nicobar Islands (Panchayats) Regulation, 1994.

1 May 2019

The appeal arose from a dispute concerning the inclusion of a Member of Parliament (MP) representing the Union Territory of Andaman and Nicobar Island...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Disqualification of Sarpanch Under Section 14(1)(j-3) of Maharashtra Village Panchayats Act — No Evidence of Wilful Omission Causing Loss to Gram Panchayat. Disqualification set aside as Collector failed to record finding of loss and appellate authority dismissed appeal without considering merits.

10 Apr 2019

The petitioner, Savita Devidas Adhane, was elected Sarpanch of Gram Panchayat Viramgaon. On 04.08.2018, the District Collector, Aurangabad, disqualifi...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Removal of Sarpanch and Members in Gram Panchayat Dispute — Procedural Violation of Natural Justice. Removal Order Set Aside as Show Cause Notice Did Not Specify Charges and Inquiry Was Conducted Without Proper Opportunity of Hearing Under Section 39 of the Maharashtra Village Panchayats Act, 1959.

1 Apr 2019

The petitioners, who were the elected Sarpanch, Upsarpanch and members of Gram Panchayat Kolhigolhar, were removed from office by an order dated 22-03...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Allows Writ Appeal of Gram Panchayat President Challenging No-Confidence Motion — Motion Invalid as Notice Did Not Comply with Rule 3(2) of Karnataka Panchayat Raj (Motion of No Confidence Against Adhyaksha and Upadhyaksha of Gram Panchayat) Rules, 1994. The court held that the requirement of specifying the date of meeting in the notice is mandatory, and non-compliance renders the motion void.

8 Feb 2019

The appellant, Smt. Gopemma, was the President of Gram Panchayat Nirna. A notice of no-confidence motion was given by 14 members of the Gram Panchayat...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Allows Writ Appeal of Gram Panchayat President Challenging No-Confidence Motion — Motion Invalid as Notice Did Not Specify Meeting Date and Time Under Section 49(2) of Karnataka Gram Swaraj and Panchayat Raj Act, 1993. The court held that the mandatory requirement of specifying date and time in the notice was not complied with, rendering the no-confidence motion invalid.

8 Feb 2019

The appellant, Smt. Gopemma, was the President of Gram Panchayat Nirna. Certain members of the Gram Panchayat issued a notice of no-confidence motion ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Petition Challenging Commissioner's Order in Gram Sabha Resolution Dispute — Procedural Irregularities in Gram Sabha Proceedings Render Resolution Invalid.

17 Oct 2012

The Petitioner, Gajanan Baburao Sankpal, was the Chairman of the Pani Purvatha Ani Swachhata Samiti (Water Supply and Sanitation Committee) constitute...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition of Skoda Auto India Pvt. Ltd. Challenging Property Tax Levy by Gram Panchayat. Held that property tax is leviable on industrial land within Gram Panchayat limits under Section 124 of the Bombay Village Panchayats Act, 1958, and the revision application under Section 124(6) was not maintainable.

31 Jan 2011

The petitioner, M/s. Skoda Auto India Pvt. Ltd., a company manufacturing automobiles, challenged the property tax demands issued by the Gram Panchayat...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitions Challenging Inclusion of Villages in Scheduled Areas Under Maharashtra Scheduled Tribes (Regulation of Issuance and Verification of) Certificate Rules, 2003. Court holds that the State Government's notification including villages in scheduled areas is valid and not subject to challenge in writ petitions.

30 Nov -0001

The judgment involves three writ petitions filed by Grampanchayats and individuals challenging the inclusion of their villages in scheduled areas unde...

1 2 3

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)