Search Results for "Excess pay recovery"

1091 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1091 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Madras High Court Partly Allows Writ Petition Quashing Recovery of Excess Pay from Government Employee; Holds Recovery After Long Delay Without Misrepresentation Impermissible Under Rafiq Masih Principles, Confirms Pay Revision and Directs Refund of Amount Recovered.

The case arose from a writ petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India by D. Sivakumar, a government employee working as Central Naz...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Madras High Court Partly Allows Writ Petition Against Recovery of Excess Pay from Steno-Typist. Recovery Set Aside on Grounds of Hardship as Employee Belonged to Group C Service, Excess Payment Exceeded Five Years, and No Misrepresentation Found, Following State of Punjab v. Rafiq Masih.

The dispute arose when the petitioner, K. Amutha, a Steno-Typist serving in the judicial department of the State of Tamil Nadu, was confronted with a ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Madras High Court Quashes Recovery Order Against Employee in Pay Fixation Dispute. Recovery of Excess Pay for Over Five Years Without Employee's Fault Held Impermissible Under Article 226 of the Constitution, Applying Rafiq Masih.

The writ petition was filed by a Sheristadar working under the Subordinate Judge, Tirukoilur, challenging an office order for recovery of excess pay a...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Madras Partly Allows Writ Petition in Service Matter — Recovery of Excess Pay Set Aside Despite Pay Revision Confirmed. Employee's Excess Pay Recovery Set Aside as Employer Error Without Misrepresentation, Applying Rafiq Masih Principles.

The writ petition was filed by A. Shenbagavalli, an employee of the subordinate judiciary in Tamil Nadu, who was appointed as a Copyist on 13.01.1999 ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Madras High Court Partly Allows Writ Petition in Service Matter — Recovery of Excess Pay Set Aside Due to Hardship and Absence of Misrepresentation. Recovery of Rs.39,343 Quashed as Employee Was Class IV, No Fraud, and Excess Payment Was Over Five Years Old; Pay Revision Based on Audit Objection Upheld.

The High Court of Madras considered a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution filed by T. Seshadri, a Dalayat in the subordinate judiciary...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Employer's Challenge to Industrial Court Order Quashing Recovery of Excess Salary Paid Due to Employer's Mistake. Recovery of Rs.1,94,637/- from Retired Employee Set Aside as Employer's Inadvertence Cannot Be Visited on Employee.

The respondent, Sou. Anjali Anil Tare, was appointed as a Lower Division Clerk (LDC) in 1977 and passed her lower division grade examination in 1980, ...