Search Results for "Eco Sensitive Zone"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal in Compulsory Retirement Case Based on Declining ...
Supreme Court Upholds High Court's Determination that Non-Signatory to MoS Not B...

Search Results for "Eco Sensitive Zone"

50 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 50 result(s)

High Court

Karnataka High Court Upholds District Task Force Committee's Power to Cancel Mining Licences for Violations of Karnataka Minor Mineral Concession Rules, 1994. The court held that the Committee has quasi-judicial authority to revoke quarrying licences for non-compliance with statutory conditions, including illegal transportation and failure to maintain records.

19 Jun 2024

The judgment pertains to a batch of writ petitions filed by several individuals, including Sri S.R. Bellary and Sri A.J. Kalkeri, challenging the reso...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses PILs Challenging Mining Leases in Ecologically Sensitive Dodamarg Taluka, Upholding Environmental Clearances and Rejecting Allegations of Procedural Violations. The court held that the environmental clearance granted to mining leases in Dodamarg Taluka, Sindhudurg district, was valid and not in violation of the Environment Impact Assessment Notification, 2006, and that the area was not declared an eco-sensitive zone under the Environment Protection Act, 1986.

22 Mar 2024

The judgment concerns two public interest litigations filed by environmental NGOs Awaaz Foundation and Vanashakti challenging mining leases granted in...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Bans Mining in Eco-Sensitive Zones Around National Parks and Wildlife Sanctuaries. Minimum 1 km Buffer Zone Mandated to Protect Forest Resources and Wildlife Habitat Under the Environment (Protection) Act, 1986 and Forest Conservation Act, 1980.

3 Jun 2022

This judgment arises from a series of interlocutory applications in the ongoing T.N. Godavarman Thirumulpad v. Union of India public interest litigati...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal by Stone Quarry Lease Holders Against NGT Order Prohibiting Mining in Elephant Corridor. The Court upheld the National Green Tribunal's directions to ban mining activities in the Similipal-Hadagarh-Kuldiha-Similipal elephant corridor and to complete the process for declaring a conservation reserve under Section 36 of the Wildlife (Protection) Act, 1972, based on environmental and wildlife conservation concerns.

2 Mar 2022

The dispute arose from an original application filed by Rural Organisation for Social Empowerment before the National Green Tribunal, seeking cancella...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Dismisses Landowner's Appeal in Eco-sensitive Zone Case, Upholding NGT's Reliance on Expert Committee Report. The Court affirmed the National Green Tribunal's jurisdiction and application of the precautionary principle under the Environment (Protection) Act, 1986, and National Green Tribunal Act, 2010, regarding the Zonal Master Plan 2030 for Mount Abu.

12 Jan 2022

The Supreme Court addressed appeals under Section 22 of the National Green Tribunal Act, 2010, arising from NGT judgments dated 10 March 2021 and 29 J...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Considers Challenge to Karwar Port Expansion Over SEIAA Authority and Consent Deficiencies. Petitions by Fishermen Associations Raise Category A Project and Pollution Control Compliance Issues Under EIA Notification.

29 Jul 2021

Two public interest litigations were filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India before the High Court of Karnataka at Bengaluru, challenging...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Quashes Revocation of Environmental Clearance for Granite Quarrying Near Bannerghatta National Park. Environmental Clearance Restored as Eco-Sensitive Zone Notification dated 11.03.2020 Limits Mining Prohibition to Notified 100-Meter Zone, Not One-Kilometer Buffer.

12 Jul 2021

The petitioner, owner of patta land in Herandyapanahalli Village, Kanakapura Taluk, was granted a work order on 14.01.2016 under Rule 32(1) of the Kar...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses PIL Challenging Aarey Colony Development as Forest Land — Held That Aarey Colony Is Not a Forest Under the Forest Conservation Act, 1980, and That the State Government Has Discretion to Use Land for Public Purposes. The court ruled that the dictionary meaning of 'forest' does not apply to Aarey Colony, and the petitioners failed to establish that it is a forest requiring prior approval under Section 2 of the Forest Conservation Act, 1980.

4 Oct 2019

The petitioners, Vanashakti (a public trust) and four individuals, filed a Public Interest Litigation under Article 226 of the Constitution of India b...

High Court

Bombay High Court Hears Public Interest Litigation on Environmental Protection in Mahabaleshwar and Panchgani Hill Stations. The matter involved various municipal councils, private owners, and regulatory bodies, but the final outcome and reasoning are not provided in the extracted text.

19 Oct 2006

...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Examines Appeals Concerning Kudankulam Nuclear Power Plant, Addressing Safety and Regulatory Measures Under Atomic Energy Act, 1962. The Court Deliberates on Balancing National Energy Policy with Public Apprehensions Stemming from Past Nuclear Incidents.

1 Jan 1970

The case centers on appeals related to the establishment of a nuclear power plant at Kudankulam in Tamil Nadu. The judgment begins by acknowledging th...

1 2 3

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)