Search Results for "Delayed Payment"

1013 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1013 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Promoter's Appeal in RERA Delayed Possession Case, Upholds Allottees' Right to Interest. Section 18 of RERA Overrides Section 55 of Contract Act; Acceptance of Delayed Possession Does Not Waive Right to Compensation.

The case involves a Second Appeal filed by CCI Projects Private Limited (the promoter) against the judgment of the Maharashtra Real Estate Appellate T...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Promoter's Appeal in RERA Case, Holding That Acceptance of Delayed Possession Without Protest Does Not Waive Right to Interest Under Section 18 of RERA. Statutory Right to Interest Under RERA Cannot Be Waived by Mere Acceptance of Possession Without a Clear Agreement.

The case involves a Second Appeal filed by CCI Projects Private Limited (the promoter) against an order of the Maharashtra Real Estate Appellate Tribu...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Bond Redemption Dispute, Upholding Defendant's Compliance with RBI Directives. Interest on Delayed Payment Not Payable Due to Regulatory Embargo and Pending Liquidation Proceedings Under Companies Act, 1956.

The dispute arose from a suit filed by M/s. SIBCO Investment Pvt Ltd against Small Industries Development Bank of India seeking interest on alleged be...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Contractor's Appeal in Arbitration Dispute Over Interest on Delayed Payment. The court examined entitlement to interest under Clause 60.8 of the contract and validity of alleged waiver through communications, referencing arbitration provisions and contract law principles.

The dispute arose from a contract awarded by the State of Kerala to the appellants for highway upgradation, executed on 7 November 2002. The appellant...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Karnataka High Court Dismisses Writ Petition by Two Companies Challenging Gratuity Payment Order — Payment of Gratuity Act, 1972. Employee's continuous service under same management entitles him to gratuity despite separate corporate identities.

The petitioners, Varma Industrial Private Limited and IBC Knowledge Park Private Limited, challenged the order dated 31.05.2018 passed by the Assistan...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Interest on Delayed Gratuity from Date of Retirement in Corruption Case Acquittal. Interest under Section 7(3A) of Payment of Gratuity Act, 1972 is payable from retirement date, not acquittal date, as gratuity becomes due on retirement regardless of pending criminal prosecution.

The petitioner, Vinodkumar Narayan Dixit, a former Deputy Collector, retired on 1st April 1997 while a criminal prosecution under the Prevention of Co...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Directs MIDC to Recalculate Water Charges for Industrial Unit Considering Water Used as Raw Material. Court Holds That Water Charges Must Be Based on Actual Consumption and Not Arbitrary Rates, and That Delayed Payment Charges Cannot Be Levied Without Proper Adjudication.

The Petitioner, Zawar Sales Limited, a small-scale industry engaged in manufacturing, filed a writ petition seeking a direction to the Maharashtra Ind...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Arbitral Award in Construction Contract Dispute. Arbitrator's rejection of escalation claim due to absence of escalation clause upheld as not patently illegal under Section 34 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

The petitioners, M/s. Gulraj Engineering Construction Co., a registered partnership firm, challenged an arbitral award dated 14 January 2009 passed by...