Search Results for "Court Fees"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Incredible Dying Declaration...
Supreme Court Enhances Child Maintenance and Grants Interim Medical Maintenance ...

Search Results for "Court Fees"

4448 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 4448 result(s)

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Indigent Person Case — Dismissal of Application Under Order 33 CPC Not a Bar for Filing Appeal Under Order 44 CPC. The Court held that the appellate court must conduct a fresh inquiry into the applicant's indigent status at the appellate stage under Order 44 Rule 3 CPC.

4 Jan 2019

The appellant, Sushil Thomas Abraham, filed a civil suit for recovery of Rs.74,66,107/- as an indigent person under Order 33 Rule 1 CPC, claiming inab...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Remands Cross-Objection in Land Acquisition Case for Merits Determination — High Court's Dismissal Without Reasons Set Aside. Cross-Objection Under Order 41 Rule 22 CPC Must Be Decided Independently Even if Main Appeal Is Dismissed.

16 Jul 2019

The Supreme Court allowed appeals by landowners against the dismissal of their cross-objection by the Himachal Pradesh High Court. The land in questio...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Property Dispute Over Rejection of Plaint Under Order VII Rule 11 CPC — Held That Plaint Disclosed Cause of Action and Court Fees Issue Was Curable. The Court restored the suit for trial, emphasizing that the High Court impermissibly conducted a mini-trial at the threshold stage.

21 Apr 2026

The appellant, M/s. Marg Limited, a real estate developer, purchased land in Chennai in 2002 and constructed a commercial IT building. In 2011 and 201...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Indigent Applicants to Pay Court Fees After Rejection of Indigency Application — Suit Deemed Instituted from Original Date. The Court held that while an indigency application can be rejected on grounds of no cause of action or bar by law, the plaintiff retains the right to pay court fees and proceed with the suit, and observations on merits at that stage are not final.

28 Jan 2022

The appellants, Solomon Selvaraj and others, filed a suit for declaration of title and recovery of possession before the Trial Court. Along with the s...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Second Appeal in Possession Suit, Confirms Concurrent Findings on Limitation and Valuation. Article 65 of Limitation Act, 1963 applies to suit for possession based on title, and valuation under Section 14(1) of Maharashtra Court Fees Act, 1959 is not a jurisdictional issue.

15 Dec 2016

The appellant, original defendant, filed a second appeal under Section 100 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, challenging the concurrent judgments ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Partly Allows Revision in Civil Suit Jurisdiction Dispute — Trial Court Directed to Frame Preliminary Issue Under Section 9A CPC on Valuation and Limitation. The court held that mixed questions of law and fact regarding jurisdiction, valuation, and limitation under Section 9A CPC and Bombay Court Fees Act require framing of issue and evidence before decision.

26 Oct 2015

The case arises from Regular Civil Suit No. 1041 of 2014 pending before the trial court. The applicant (original defendant) filed two applications: on...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Revision Against Rejection of Inquiry into Valuation and Court Fees in Suit for Declaration of Sale Deed as Void. Court Held That Section 8 of Maharashtra Court-Fees Act, 1959 Confers Discretion on Trial Court to Inquire into Valuation, Not a Mandatory Duty.

6 Jul 2015

The case arises from a civil suit filed by the plaintiff (respondent No.1) seeking a declaration that a sale deed of suit property is void, illegal, a...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Second Appeal in Property Dispute Between Brothers, Remands Case for Fresh Consideration of Counterclaim. Court holds that a counterclaim for possession cannot be decreed without proper valuation and payment of court fees under the Bombay Court Fees Act, 1959.

15 Jan 2015

The appellant, original plaintiff Gujabrao, filed Special Civil Suit No.90/1993 for a permanent injunction against his brother Punjabrao (defendant No...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Rejection of Plaint Rejection Application Under Order VII Rule 11 CPC. Court holds that valuation for court fees and jurisdiction is a mixed question of law and fact not to be decided at preliminary stage.

20 Jan 2015

The petitioner, M/s Prism Reality, filed a writ petition under Article 227 of the Constitution challenging the order dated 30.07.2014 passed by the le...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Order on Pecuniary Jurisdiction — Suit Valuation Determined by Relief Sought in Plaint. The court held that the trial court erred in relying on the defendant's valuation of the suit property to oust its pecuniary jurisdiction, as the valuation for jurisdiction must be based on the relief claimed in the plaint under Section 6 of the Bombay Court Fees Act, 1959.

10 Sep 2014

The petitioners, original plaintiffs, filed Regular Civil Suit No.124 of 2013 before the 4th Joint Civil Judge (Jr. Dn.), Akola, seeking a declaration...

1 2 3

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)