Search Results for "Cabinet decision"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Upholds Refusal to Eschew Proof Affidavit in Probate Proceedings. ...
Supreme Court Allows Agriculturists' Appeal for Enhanced Compensation; Condones ...

Search Results for "Cabinet decision"

393 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 393 result(s)

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Appeal of Central Council for Research in Ayurvedic Sciences in Service Matter — Retirement Age Enhancement Not Applicable to Autonomous Body Employees. The Court held that the Cabinet decision to enhance superannuation age to 65 years for AYUSH doctors was limited to those directly under the Ministry of AYUSH and CGHS, and did not extend to employees of autonomous bodies like CCRAS.

1 Jan 2023

The case involves an appeal by the Central Council for Research in Ayurvedic Sciences (CCRAS) and its Director General against the judgment of the Ori...

High Court

High Court of Bombay at Goa Delivers Judgment on Writ Petitions Challenging Rejection of GPSC Recommendations for Junior Scale Officer Posts. The Court Examined Whether the Cabinet Decision Was Arbitrary and Violative of Constitutional Guarantees.

21 Dec 2012

The judgment concerns two writ petitions filed before the High Court of Bombay at Goa challenging a Cabinet decision of the Government of Goa. The dis...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal Against Withdrawal of NOC for Ayurvedic College — NOC Issued Without Following Rules of Business Is Invalid and Creates No Indefeasible Right.

17 Feb 2025

The appeal arose from the withdrawal of a No Objection Certificate (NOC) issued to the appellant Trust for establishing an Ayurvedic Medical College a...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeals of Retired Employees Challenging Cut-off Date for Triple Benefit Scheme. Cut-off Date of 31.08.2010 Based on Cabinet Decision Held Not Arbitrary and Not Violative of Article 14.

4 Feb 2020

The appellants were retired teaching and non-teaching employees of deficit grant minority colleges in Bihar. They challenged the cut-off date of 31.08...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Service Matter — Reversion of Officer Holding Tenure Post to Parent State with Stigma Amounts to Reduction in Rank under Article 311(2). The Court held that offering alternatives of lower post, reversion, or retirement, with imputation of unsatisfactory work, constitutes a penalty and requires enquiry under Article 311(2) of the Constitution.

8 Apr 1969

The dispute arose when Debesh Chandra Das, a senior member of the Indian Civil Service holding the post of Secretary to the Government of India, was a...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Non-Appointment as CESTAT Member — Selection Committee Recommendation Not Binding on Appointing Authority. The court held that the petitioner had no right to appointment based solely on the recommendation of the Selection Committee, and the Appointments Committee of the Cabinet (A.C.C.) was entitled to withhold approval.

22 Aug 2006

The petitioner, Ramesh Motiram Ramchandani, a Commissioner (Appeals-I) in Customs & Central Excise, filed a Writ Petition before the Bombay High Court...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitions Challenging Appointment of MLC as Minister, Upholds Validity of Nomination of MLCs to Legislative Council. The Court held that the Governor's power to nominate members under Article 171(5) of the Constitution is not subject to the aid and advice of the Council of Ministers, and that an MLC is eligible to be appointed as a Minister under Article 164(4).

30 Nov -0001

The judgment pertains to two writ petitions filed challenging the appointment of Shri Suresh Sakhabapu Deshmukh, a Member of the Legislative Council (...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Public Interest Litigation to Protect Land for Government Sports Complex at Navi Mumbai. CIDCO's commercial allotment of land earmarked for sports complex quashed; State Government's decision to shift complex to remote location set aside.

1 Jul 2024

The Bombay High Court was hearing a Public Interest Litigation filed by the Indian Institute of Architects, Navi Mumbai Center, challenging the action...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Upholds Withdrawal of Inter-Commissionerate Transfers for Inspectors Under Recruitment Rules 2016. Recruitment Rules Made Under Article 309 of the Constitution Prevail Over Executive Instructions, and ICTs Are Not Permissible as They Violate Separate Cadre Identity Under Rule 5.

10 Mar 2022

The dispute arose from a batch of civil appeals filed by Inspectors of the Central Excise and Land Customs or Goods and Services Tax Administration, w...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Appeal of SSD Fund Employees for Pensionary Benefits Under 6th CPC — Holds That Long-Term Employment with Government Control and Parity with Regular Employees Confers Status of Government Servants. The Court found that denial of benefits to SSD Fund staff while granting them to other SFF personnel performing similar duties violates Article 14 of the Constitution.

21 Aug 2024

The Supreme Court allowed the appeal filed by six employees (Rajkaran Singh, Jagat Ram Joshi, Vishu Dutt Tripathi, HK Naithani, Shiv Kumar, and Surat ...

1 2 3

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)