Search Results for "CGST Act 2017"

211 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 211 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court Quashes Penalty on Company Officials Under CGST Act Due to Lack of Personal Liability Evidence and Procedural Flaws. Petitioners Challenge Penalty Order for Fake Input Tax Credit Allegations

The petitioners, employees of M/s. Shemaroo Entertainment Limited, filed a writ petition challenging an order-in-original dated 1 February 2025 that i...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court Quashes GST Appellate Order Against Indian Oil Corporation for Violation of Natural Justice — Pre-deposit Requirement Set Aside. Failure to Provide Personal Hearing and Reasoned Order Renders Appellate Order Unsustainable Under Section 107(11) of CGST Act, 2017.

The petitioner, M/s Indian Oil Corporation Ltd., a public sector undertaking engaged in storage and supply of petroleum products, filed a writ petitio...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes GST Summons Issued by DGGI Ahmedabad to Petitioners in Maharashtra for Lack of Territorial Jurisdiction. Summons under Section 70 of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 must be issued by an officer having jurisdiction over the place of business of the person summoned.

The petitioners, Shantanu Sanjay Hundekari, Vikas Agarwal, Yogesh Agarwal, and Mamta Gupta, are residents of Maharashtra and their place of business i...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Validity of GST Circulars on Input Tax Credit Reversal for Exempted Supplies. Circulars Clarifying Section 17(2) of CGST Act, 2017 Held Not Ultra Vires as They Merely Interpret Existing Provisions.

The petitioner, Fomento Resorts and Hotels Ltd., a company incorporated under the Indian Companies Act, 1956, challenged the validity of Circular No.3...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Blocking of Input Tax Credit Under Rule 86-A of CGST/MGST Rules for Violation of Natural Justice. Prior Hearing Mandated Before Blocking Credit Under Rule 86-A.

The petitioner, Ashapura Steel Metal, through its proprietor Velaram Viraji Choudhary, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Constitutional Validity of Time Limit for Availing Input Tax Credit Under Section 16(4) of CGST Act. The court held that the time limit is mandatory and not directory, and retrospective amendments are valid.

The Bombay High Court, in a batch of writ petitions, addressed the constitutional validity and interpretation of Section 16(4) of the Central Goods an...