Search Results for "Basic Customs Duty"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Incredible Dying Declaration...
Supreme Court Quashes Criminal Proceedings Under Section 182 IPC for Lack of Val...

Search Results for "Basic Customs Duty"

482 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 482 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Hears Challenge to Denial of Exemption for Transitional Product Specific Safeguard Duty under Section 8C of Customs Tariff Act, 1975. Petitioner Asserts Notification No.96/2009-Cus. Intended to Exempt All Safeguard Duties and Phrase 'under section 8B' is Discriminatory.

23 Dec 2015

The petitioner, a public limited company manufacturing pneumatic tyres, regularly imported Carbon Black from the People’s Republic of China. Carbon ...

High Court

High Court of Bombay Allows Writ Petition Seeking Reassessment of Customs Duty Due to Typographical Error in Customs Tariff Heading. Petitioner's Inadvertent Error in Declaring CTH 85176990 Instead of 85176930 for Routers Entitles Correction Under Customs Act, 1962.

18 Jan 2021

The petitioner, Dimension Data India Private Ltd., an importer, filed five Bills of Entry between 15.03.2019 and 25.04.2019 for importing 48 units of ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Customs Application Seeking Reference of Questions of Law on Conversion of Bill of Entry. CEGAT Upheld Denial of Reconversion of Assessed Home Consumption Bill of Entry into Bond Bill of Entry Under Section 46(5) of Customs Act, 1962.

17 Aug 2005

The applicant, Jain Irrigation Systems, a 100% Export Oriented Unit (EOU), imported a consignment of Pipe Head PHPO 40 under Customs Tariff Head 8477....

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Standing Orders in Customs Valuation Dispute — Mandates Acceptance of Declared Transaction Value. Petitioner's imported goods detained on suspicion of undervaluation; court holds that without proper inquiry under Customs Act, 1962, rejection of transaction value is arbitrary.

27 Oct 2020

The Petitioner, The Supreme Industries Ltd., a company in the plastics industry, imported goods and filed bills of entry declaring the transaction val...

High Court

Madras High Court Allows Writ Petitions Challenging Customs Duty Demand on Vessels Imported Prior to Notification. Condition No.82 of Notification 12/2012-Cus. Cannot Be Applied Retrospectively to Vessels Imported Before Its Effective Date.

5 Jan 2026

The petitioner, The Great Eastern Shipping Company Ltd., imported two vessels, 'Jag Rishi' and 'Jag Rahul', prior to 17.03.2012. On 17.03.2012, the Ce...

High Court

Bombay High Court Examines Whether Interest is Leviable on Additional Duty of Customs and Settlement Commission's Power to Rectify Errors. The Court Scrutinised the Legality of Imposing Interest on Counter Veiling Duty Where Modvat Credit Was Available and Considered Whether Tribunals Have Inherent Jurisdiction to Correct Accidental Mistakes Under Section 127H of Customs Act, 1962.

27 Apr 2005

The matter arose from a writ petition filed by a public limited company engaged in manufacturing automotive furnishing fabrics, challenging the order ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petitions Challenging Customs Duty Demand on Jewellery Exports from SEZ — Held that goods manufactured in SEZ and exported are not liable to customs duty under Section 2(23) of the Customs Act, 1962 read with SEZ Act, 2005. The court ruled that the SEZ Act, 2005 is a complete code and overrides the Customs Act, and the demand of duty was contrary to the scheme of the SEZ Act.

19 Nov 2022

The petitioners, M/s. Renaissance Global Limited and M/s. Gold Star Jewellery Designs Pvt. Ltd., are companies engaged in the manufacture and export o...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Against Customs Demand for Bank Guarantee and Bond for Past Imports — Notification 26/2000-Cus Benefit Cannot Be Withheld Retrospectively Without Show Cause Notice. The court held that demanding security for past final assessments without issuing a show cause notice or alleging fraud violates principles of natural justice and Section 28 of the Customs Act, 1962.

6 Apr 2010

The petitioner, Biharilal Singhal, proprietor of HiTech Corporation, imported Printed Thermal Paper Rolls and filed two Bills of Entry in August 2009....

High Court

Bombay High Court Hears Revenue Appeals on Duty Liability for Confiscated Medical Equipment Cleared Under Conditional Exemption Notification No. 64/88-Cus. Court Examines Whether Redemption of Goods is a Pre-Condition for Customs Duty Demand Under Section 125(2) of the Customs Act, 1962.

28 Apr 2006

Background: The case involves two customs appeals before the High Court of Judicature at Bombay, filed by the Commissioner of Customs against separate...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Dismisses Customs Appeal on Valuation of Imported Goods Under Customs Act, 1962 — Design and Supervision Charges Not Addable to Transaction Value. The Court held that costs for post-importation activities like erection, commissioning, and performance guarantee tests are not includible in the assessable value of imported goods under Rule 4 read with Rule 9(1)(e) of the Customs Valuation Rules, 1988.

27 Apr 2020

The appeal arose from a dispute between the Commissioner of Customs (Port), Kolkata, and Steel Authority of India Ltd. (SAIL) regarding the valuation ...

1 2 3

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)