Search Results for "Arbitral Tribunal Jurisdiction"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Enhances Child Maintenance and Grants Interim Medical Maintenance ...
Supreme Court Upholds Refusal to Eschew Proof Affidavit in Probate Proceedings. ...

Search Results for "Arbitral Tribunal Jurisdiction"

1510 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1510 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Employer's Challenge to Arbitral Award in Construction Contract Dispute; Upholds Legal Successor's Right to Enforce Arbitration Agreement. Non-Consent to Assignment by Employer Does Not Extinguish Original Contractor's Rights; Limitation Period Held Not Barred Due to Continuing Proceedings Under Contract's Dispute Resolution Mechanism.

31 Oct 2017

The dispute arose from a construction contract for the Bombay Sewage Project awarded by the Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai (MCGM) to a German...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Revision Application Challenging Execution of Arbitral Award, Rejecting Argument that Only Debt Recovery Tribunal Had Jurisdiction. Arbitral Award for Loan Recovery Upheld as Respondent Finance Company Not Notified as Financial Institution Under Section 2(h) of Recovery of Debts Due to Banks and Financial Institutions Act, 1993, and Therefore Section 18 Did Not Oust Arbitrator's Jurisdiction.

2 Aug 2011

The dispute arose when the petitioners borrowed money from the respondent and failed to repay, leading the respondent to invoke arbitration under the ...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Dismisses Municipal Corporation's Appeal in Arbitration Case Upholding Arbitral Award. Challenge to Tribunal's Constitution Fails as 30-Day Appointment Period in Arbitration Agreement is Directory, Not Mandatory, Under Sections 16, 34, and 37 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

11 Mar 2026

The dispute originated from a consultancy agreement dated 18 September 1995 between the Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai (MCGM) and Respondent ...

High Court

High Court of Bombay Considers Petition for Termination of Standing Arbitral Tribunal's Mandate in Railway Construction Contract Dispute. Petitioner Seeks Appointment of New Arbitral Tribunal Under Sections 11(6), 14(2), and 15(2) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, Alleging Lack of Independence of Serving Railway Officer Arbitrators.

12 Dec 2019

The petitioner, ITD Cementation India Ltd., a company engaged in construction and infrastructure, was awarded a contract by the respondent, Konkan Rai...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Arbitration Case, Clarifying Jurisdiction Requirements Under Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996. The Court Held That Service of Section 21 Notice and Inclusion in Section 11 Application Are Not Prerequisites for Arbitral Tribunal to Exercise Jurisdiction Over a Person, and Impleadment is Based on Being Party to Arbitration Agreement.

17 Apr 2025

The dispute arose from an agreement dated 01.06.2012 between the appellant and respondent no. 1 to form a Limited Liability Partnership (respondent no...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal Against Arbitral Award in Contractual Dispute — Constitution of Arbitral Tribunal Upheld Despite Appointment of Third Arbitrator by Appointing Authority. The court held that the appointment of a third arbitrator under Section 11(4) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, without party consultation, is valid when one party fails to appoint its arbitrator, and the award on merits, including interest at 18% per annum, is not against public policy.

14 Sep 2010

The case involves an appeal under Section 37 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, challenging a judgment of the District Judge, Pune, which ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Section 9 Petition for Lack of Territorial Jurisdiction in International Commercial Arbitration. Parties Impliedly Excluded Part I of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 by Agreeing to ICC Rules and Zambian Law.

19 Mar 2013

The petitioner, Konkola Copper Mines (PLC), a company registered in Zambia, filed a petition under Section 9 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeals Against Setting Aside of Arbitral Awards for Lack of Concluded Contract. Joint Exploration Agreement Held Not Binding as Conditions Precedent Not Fulfilled, Resulting in No Valid Arbitration Agreement.

16 Oct 2019

The case involves appeals by Hindustan Petroleum Corporation Ltd. and Prize Petroleum Company Ltd. (appellants) against M3nergy Sdn. Bhd. (respondent)...

High Court

High Court of Judicature at Bombay Adjudicates Section 34 Petition Against Partial Arbitral Award Upholding Initialled Joint Executing Agreement as Valid Arbitration Agreement. Initialling and Conduct Found to Evidence Mutual Assent, Establishing Binding Contract Under Section 7, Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

3 Nov 2025

The dispute arose from a consortium formed by M3nergy Sdn. Bhd. (M3), Hindustan Petroleum Corporation Ltd. (HPCL), and Prize Petroleum Company Ltd. (P...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Dismisses Section 11 Petition for Appointment of Arbitrator in International Commercial Arbitration Dispute. Seat of Arbitration Held to be Dubai, UAE, Not India, Based on Express Terms of Distributorship Agreement.

15 Nov 2024

The present petition was filed under Section 11(6)(a) read with Section 11(12)(a) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, seeking appointment o...

1 2 3

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)