Search Results for "Additional Evidence"

26 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 26 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Appellate Court's Orders Allowing Document Production Under Section 391 CrPC in Cheque Dishonor Appeal -- No Prejudice Found in Permitting Additional Evidence for Defense

The petitioner filed a criminal writ petition challenging two orders of the Additional Sessions Judge, Ahmednagar that allowed the accused to produce ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court Allows Writ Petitions, Quashes Caste Scrutiny Committee Order and Validates Thakur Scheduled Tribe Claim of Petitioners Under Article 226 of Constitution

The High Court allowed two Writ Petitions filed by Petitioners challenging the Caste Scrutiny Committee's order that invalidated their Thakur Schedule...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court Sets Aside Arbitral Award in Partnership Dispute Between Parties Arbitration Petition Allowed Under Section 34 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 Due to Procedural Irregularities

The High Court allowed an arbitration petition challenging an arbitral award in a partnership dispute -- The Court found that the arbitral tribunal co...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court Allows Appeal Quashing Municipal Notice Under MMC Act Due to Jurisdictional Defect -- Notice Under Section 314 Invalid for Failing to Specify Contravention of Sections 312, 313 or 313A

The appellant challenged a City Civil Court order that validated a notice under Section 314 of the Mumbai Municipal Corporation Act, 1888 (MMC Act) re...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court upheld the summoning of additional accused post-trial conclusion, emphasizing the High Court’s revisional powers and the necessity of fresh trials to ensure justice.

Criminal Procedure Code, 1973 — Section 319 — Summoning of Additional Accused Post-Trial Conclusion Held Valid — Reiteration of Revi...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Assessment Orders Passed in Name of Non-Existent Entities Post-Amalgamation Held Void Ab Initio – Reliance Industries Limited vs. Commissioner of Income Tax. Jurisdictional Ground Raised After Three Decades Upheld – Supreme Court Precedents on Amalgamation Applied

Jurisdictional Issue:– Assessment orders passed against non-existent entities post-amalgamation are void ab initio, as the entities cease to exist a...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Appeal against the direction of 'pay and recover' by the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Nagpur – Learner’s licence validity and Rule 3(b) of the Central Motor Vehicles Rules, 1989 interpreted – Exemption for motorcycle riders under Rule 24(3)(v) clarified.

The High Court upheld the tribunal's direction of 'pay and recover' and ruled that the appellant violated Rule 3(b) by driving without an instructor. ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

"Bombay High Court Dismisses Chamber Summons Filed to Introduce Additional Evidence in Appeal Related to Specific Performance" "Court emphasizes the discretionary nature of Order 41 Rule 27 CPC and deters misuse aimed at prolonging litigation."

The Bombay High Court dismissed a Chamber Summons filed under Order 41 Rule 27(1)(aa) of the CPC by the Appellants seeking to produce additional evide...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court Quashes Sessions Court Order Allowing Additional Evidence Post-Trial Commencement – Upholds Accused’s Right to Fair Trial. Court Reiterates Public Prosecutor’s Non-Partisan Role and Limits on Producing Evidence Post-Charge Framing

Public Prosecutor’s Role – The Public Prosecutor cannot assume the role of an Investigating Officer or produce evidence beyond what is filed with...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

"Disputed Tenancy Rights in Walkeshwar Property" Upholding the Sanctity of Tenancy under the Maharashtra Rent Control Act.

The case revolves around the claim of tenancy rights by the plaintiff, Mr. Pradeep Kumar Lalit Kumar Pandya, over two residential units in Kapadia Bui...