Supreme Court Dismisses Wife's Appeal in Divorce Case Upholding Findings of Cruelty and Desertion. Family Court and High Court's factual findings based on evidence appreciation were affirmed as no perversity was demonstrated under Sections 13(1)(ia) and 13(1)(ib) of Hindu Marriage Act, 1955, though maintenance was modified to monthly payments.

  • 13
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The dispute arose from a divorce petition filed by the husband against the wife under the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955. The parties were married in 2002 according to Hindu rites and had two children born in 2003 and 2005. After initial cohabitation in the joint family home, disputes emerged with allegations from both sides. The wife alleged cruelty including dowry harassment and being driven out of the matrimonial home, while the husband alleged the wife insisted on separate living, used abusive language, and caused continuous mental and physical harassment. The husband filed for divorce under Sections 13(1)(ia) and 13(1)(ib) of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955, alleging cruelty and desertion. The Family Court granted divorce in 2022, finding the husband had established both grounds based on evidence including the wife's quarrels, complaints about her conduct, and her failure to seek restitution of conjugal rights or custody of children. The High Court affirmed this decision in 2023, noting additional evidence including an undertaking by the wife to maintain cordial relations and testimony from the son supporting cruelty allegations. The wife appealed to the Supreme Court challenging these findings. The core legal issue was whether the findings of cruelty and desertion warranted interference by the Supreme Court. The wife's counsel argued against the findings, while the husband's counsel supported them. The Supreme Court analyzed the evidence considered by lower courts, including the wife's conduct, complaints, undertaking, children's testimony, and prolonged separation since 2018. The court reasoned that the findings were factual based on appreciation of evidence and no perversity was demonstrated to justify interference under its limited appellate jurisdiction. The court also noted the irretrievable breakdown of marriage due to prolonged separation. However, regarding maintenance, the court modified the Family Court's lump sum award of Rs.6,00,000 to monthly payments of Rs.10,000 from the date of its order to ensure continued financial support for the wife. The court dismissed the appeal on the divorce decree but allowed the maintenance modification.

Headnote

A) Family Law - Divorce - Cruelty and Desertion - Hindu Marriage Act, 1955, Sections 13(1)(ia), 13(1)(ib) - The appellant wife challenged divorce decree granted to respondent husband on grounds of cruelty and desertion - Supreme Court examined findings of Family Court and High Court based on evidence including appellant's quarrels, complaints, undertaking to maintain cordial relations, and children's testimony - Held that findings were factual based on evidence appreciation and no perversity was demonstrated to warrant interference (Paras 5-10).

B) Family Law - Divorce - Irretrievable Breakdown - Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 - Supreme Court noted parties married in 2002 and living separately since 2018 - Court observed prolonged separation indicated matrimonial bond broken beyond repair with no possibility of resuming cohabitation - This circumstance supported lower courts' conclusions on cruelty and desertion (Paras 8-9).

C) Family Law - Maintenance - Financial Support After Divorce - Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 - Family Court had awarded lump sum maintenance of Rs.6,00,000 - Supreme Court modified maintenance to ensure continued financial support - Directed respondent to pay Rs.10,000 per month to appellant from date of order in interest of complete justice (Paras 11-12).

Issue of Consideration: Whether the findings of cruelty and desertion under Sections 13(1)(ia) and 13(1)(ib) of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 recorded by the Family Court and affirmed by the High Court warrant interference by the Supreme Court

Final Decision

Appeal disposed of; findings of lower courts on cruelty and desertion affirmed; maintenance modified to Rs.10,000 per month payable from date of order

2026 LawText (SC) (04) 42

Civil Appeal No. of 2026 @ Special Leave Petition (Civil) No. 20325 of 2024

2026-04-10

Vikram Nath J. , Sandeep Mehta J.

2026 INSC 346

Mamta Devi

Sanjay Kumar

Nature of Litigation: Divorce proceedings under Hindu Marriage Act, 1955

Remedy Sought

Appellant wife seeking to set aside divorce decree granted to respondent husband

Filing Reason

Appellant aggrieved by High Court judgment affirming Family Court's divorce decree

Previous Decisions

Family Court granted divorce to respondent on 23.11.2022; High Court dismissed appellant's appeal on 04.10.2023

Issues

Whether findings of cruelty and desertion under Sections 13(1)(ia) and 13(1)(ib) of Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 recorded by lower courts warrant interference by Supreme Court

Ratio Decidendi

Findings of cruelty and desertion based on appreciation of evidence by lower courts are factual and do not warrant interference unless perversity is demonstrated; prolonged separation indicates irretrievable breakdown of marriage; maintenance can be modified to ensure continued financial support

Judgment Excerpts

The Family Court upon appreciation of oral and documentary evidence led by the parties, recorded a finding that the respondent had established cruelty and desertion within the meaning of Sections 13(1)(ia) and 13(1)(ib) of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1956. Having gone through the record, we are of the opinion that the findings recorded by Courts below are findings of fact based on appreciation of evidence. No perversity has been demonstrated so as to warrant the interference of this Court. we deem it appropriate in the interest of complete justice to direct the respondent to pay a sum of Rs.10,000 per month to the appellant towards maintenance, payable from the date of this order.

Procedural History

Marriage solemnized on 24.02.2002; Respondent filed O.S. (DP) 486/2018 seeking divorce; Family Court granted divorce on 23.11.2022; Appellant filed First Appeal No. 9/2023 before High Court; High Court dismissed appeal on 04.10.2023; Appellant filed Special Leave Petition (Civil) No. 20325/2024 before Supreme Court; Supreme Court disposed of appeal on 10.04.2026

Related Judgement
Supreme Court Supreme Court Dismisses Wife's Appeal in Divorce Case Upholding Findings of Cruelty and Desertion. Family Court and High Court's factual findings based on evidence appreciation were affirmed as no perversity was demonstrated under Sections 13(1)(ia) ...
Related Judgement
Supreme Court Supreme Court Restores Eviction Decree Against Tenant — Reaffirms Scope of Second Appeal Jurisdiction