Search Results for "120 Days Limitation"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Incredible Dying Declaration...
Supreme Court Quashes Criminal Proceedings Under Section 182 IPC for Lack of Val...

Search Results for "120 Days Limitation"

541 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 541 result(s)

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal Against Arbitral Award Challenge as Barred by Limitation — Section 4 of Limitation Act Does Not Extend 30-Day Condonable Period Under Section 34(3) of Arbitration Act When It Expires During Court Vacation. The Court held that Section 4 of the Limitation Act applies only to the 3-month prescribed period, not to the 30-day condonable period under the proviso to Section 34(3), and Section 10 of the General Clauses Act is inapplicable.

1 Jan 2025

The case involves an appeal by My Preferred Trans Formation & Hospitality Pvt. Ltd. and another against M/s Faridabad Implements Pvt. Ltd. arising fro...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal Against Condonation of Delay in MPID Act Case — Designated Court Has No Power to Condon Delay Beyond 90 Days Under Section 5(3) of MPID Act. Limitation Period for Filing Application Under Section 5(3) is 90 Days, Delay Cannot Be Condoned Beyond That Period as MPID Act is a Complete Code.

17 Feb 2020

The appellants, Mr. Nimish s/o Satish Deopujari, Mr. Satish s/o Shankarrao Deopujari, and Sau. Vandana w/o Satish Deopujari, filed an Appeal Against O...

High Court

Bombay High Court Considers Limitation Plea in Suit Alleging Fraud and Late Delivery of Goods Shipped Under Bill of Lading. Defendants Seek Dismissal of Suit on Grounds of One-Year Limitation Period Under Article III(6) of the Carriage of Goods by Sea Act, 1925.

24 Mar 2006

(1) Background: The plaintiff, a Korean company, entered into a contract with Indian exporters for the purchase of cold rolled steel sheets to be ship...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Exclusion of 1854 Days for Filing Challenge to MSME Award Due to Bona Fide Prosecution in Wrong Forum and COVID-19. Period from 5 April 2017 to 1 November 2022 excluded under Section 14 of Limitation Act, 1963 read with Section 34(3) of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

20 Dec 2023

The applicant, Bharat Electronics Limited, filed an Interim Application seeking exclusion of 1854 days from 5 April 2017 to 1 November 2022 for comput...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Dismisses Revenue Appeal in Income Tax Limitation Case Under Section 144C. Nagarathna J. Holds That Section 144C Does Not Extend Limitation Under Section 153 of Income Tax Act, 1961.

1 Jan 1970

This separate opinion by Nagarathna J. arises from civil appeals filed by the Revenue against a common order of the Bombay High Court. The High Court ...

High Court

High Court of Bombay Examines Limitation for Suit Against Port Trust Under Section 120 of Major Port Trusts Act, 1963. Plaintiffs' Notice Under Section 120 Sent More Than Five Years After Lease Expiry and Accrual of Cause of Action.

4 Jul 2013

The suit was instituted by Kewal Kishan Aggarwal and others against the Board of Trustees of the Port of Mumbai seeking renewal of seven leases that e...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal Against Arbitral Award Due to Excessive Delay in Filing Section 37 Appeal. Delay of 189 days beyond 90-day statutory period cannot be condoned as it exceeds the maximum permissible delay of 120 days under Section 37 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 read with Section 5 of the Limitation Act, 1963.

6 Dec 2019

The case arose from an arbitral award dated 19.12.2006 made by Justice K.N. Saikia, a retired Supreme Court judge. The award was challenged under Sect...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Electricity Dues Recovery Suit — Limitation Period for Suit by Electricity Board Governed by Article 113 of Limitation Act, 1963, Not Article 14. Suit for recovery of arrears of electricity charges filed within three years of demand notice held within limitation; interest rate reduced from 18% to 12% p.a.

23 Sep 2010

The appeal was filed by M/s. G.T. Iron & Steel Works (original defendants) against the judgment and decree dated 15th June 2002 passed by the Civil Ju...

High Court

High Court Dismisses Appeal as Time-Barred in Land Acquisition Compensation Case — Delay of 179 Days Beyond Extended Limitation of 120 Days Cannot Be Condoned Under Section 74(1) of RFCTLARR Act, 2013.

23 Sep 2024

The appellant, Karnataka Neeravari Nigama Limited, filed an appeal under Section 74(1) of the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acqu...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal in Bank Account Suit — Plaint Rejected as Barred by Limitation Under Article 113 of Limitation Act, 1963. Exchange of Correspondence Cannot Extend Limitation Once Right to Sue Accrues.

1 Jan 2020

The appellant, Shakti Bhog Food Industries Ltd., filed a civil suit in 2005 against the Central Bank of India and another respondent seeking a decree ...

1 2 3

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)