National Company Law Appellate Tribunal Dismisses Appeal in Insolvency Matter — Classification of Debt Disputed. The Appellant's claim for financial creditor status was rejected as the transactions were deemed operational debt under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016.

Tribunals: National Company Law Appellate Tribunal Bench: NEW DELHI
  • 1
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The appeal was filed by the South Indian Bank against an order of the National Company Law Tribunal (NCLT) which dismissed the Bank's application to be recognized as a financial creditor concerning credit facilities extended to RCI Industries and Technologies Limited under the Trade Receivables Discounting System (TReDS). The Bank had provided various credit facilities, including a cash credit facility and a TReDS facility, but the NCLT classified the TReDS exposure as operational debt. The Bank argued that the TReDS transactions constituted financial debt under Section 5(8) of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 (IBC), as they involved disbursement against the time value of money. The NCLT had previously accepted the cash credit part as financial debt but rejected the TReDS claim, leading to the appeal. The Appellant contended that the NCLT's decision was erroneous and failed to consider the nature of the transactions and the regulatory framework governing banks. The Respondent, representing the resolution professional, argued that the debt was operational in nature, as it arose from the discounting of trade receivables originally payable by the Corporate Debtor to its suppliers. The Tribunal analyzed the nature of the transactions, referencing previous judgments, and ultimately upheld the NCLT's classification of the debt as operational, stating that no disbursement was made directly to the Corporate Debtor. The appeal was dismissed, and the Tribunal noted that the resolution plan had been fully implemented, rendering the appeal infructuous.

Headnote

A) Insolvency Law - Classification of Debt - Financial vs Operational Debt - Nature of Debt - Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016, Section 5(8) - The Appellant contended that the credit facility extended through TReDS should be classified as financial debt, while the Respondent maintained it was operational debt. The Tribunal held that the nature of the transaction did not meet the criteria for financial debt as defined under the IBC, affirming the lower authority's classification (Paras 48-49).

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the credit facility extended by the Appellant to the Corporate Debtor constitutes 'financial debt' or 'operational debt' under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The Tribunal dismissed the appeal, affirming the NCLT's classification of the debt as operational and not financial, stating that no disbursement was made to the Corporate Debtor.

Law Points

  • financial debt
  • operational debt
  • Trade Receivables Discounting System
  • reverse factoring
  • Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code
  • 2016
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2026 LawText (NCLAT) (07) 72

Company Appeal (AT) (Insolvency) No. 597 of 2025

2025-02-13

Justice N. Seshasayee, Arun Baroka

Ms. Samiksha Godiyal, Mr. Arsh Khan, Mr. Ritwik Narayanan, Mr. Tenzing Bhatia, Ms. Swapnil Gupta

The South Indian Bank Ltd.

Brijesh Singh Bhadauriya

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Appeal against the dismissal of an application to classify debt as financial under the IBC.

Remedy Sought

The Appellant sought to be recognized as a financial creditor.

Filing Reason

The Appellant contended that the TReDS transactions constituted financial debt.

Previous Decisions

The NCLT had previously classified the TReDS exposure as operational debt.

Issues

Whether the credit facility constitutes financial debt or operational debt under the IBC. Whether the previous decision in Mudraksh is applicable to the current case.

Submissions/Arguments

The Appellant argued that the TReDS transactions should be classified as financial debt. The Respondent maintained that the debt was operational in nature, arising from trade receivables.

Ratio Decidendi

The classification of debt under the IBC depends on the nature of the transaction, specifically whether there was a disbursement to the Corporate Debtor, which was absent in this case.

Judgment Excerpts

The Appellant contended that the credit facility extended through TReDS should be classified as financial debt. The Tribunal held that the nature of the transaction did not meet the criteria for financial debt as defined under the IBC.

Procedural History

The appeal was filed against the NCLT's order dated 13.02.2025, which dismissed the Appellant's application for reclassification of debt.

Acts & Sections

  • Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016: Section 5(8), Section 5(20), Section 5(21)
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
Supreme Court Supreme Court Upholds Customs Confiscation and Penalty in Foreign Exchange Export Case Based on Co-Accused Statement Under Section 108 Customs Act. Statement Recorded Under Section 108 of Customs Act Held Admissible as Substantive Evidence Against Pe...
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition for Regularisation of Contractual Employees in District Child Protection Units Under Integrated Child Protection Scheme — Violation of Articles 14 and 16 of Constitution. Petitioners appointed on contract basi...