National Company Law Appellate Tribunal Dismisses Company Appeal Due to Delay in Filing. The appeal was found to be barred by limitation as it was filed beyond the prescribed period under Section 421 of the Companies Act, 2013.

Tribunals: National Company Law Appellate Tribunal Bench: New Delhi
  • 1
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The case involved two company appeals filed by Anjaniputra Ispat Ltd. against IAG Company Ltd. and Trust Estate Khimji Keshwaji. The appellant filed an appeal on 20.11.2025 against an order dated 08.09.2025, invoking Section 61 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code (I&B Code), accompanied by a delay condonation application for 53 days. The Tribunal noted that the appeal under Section 61 was not maintainable as it pertained to an order under the Companies Act, 2013. Subsequently, the appellant sought to convert the appeal to one under Section 421 of the Companies Act, which was granted on 29.01.2026. However, the appellant filed a fresh appeal under Section 421 on 30.01.2026, which was accompanied by another delay condonation application for 43 days. The Tribunal analyzed the limitation provisions under both the I&B Code and the Companies Act, concluding that the appeal was barred by limitation as it was filed beyond the permissible period. The court emphasized that the conversion of the appeal did not provide continuity in the limitation period, and thus, the delay condonation application was rejected. The Tribunal ultimately dismissed both appeals due to the delay in filing (Paras 1-29).

Headnote

A) Company Law - Limitation for Appeals - Delay Condonation - Companies Act, 2013, Section 421 - The appeal was filed beyond the prescribed limitation period, and the appellant's request for condonation of delay was denied as the appeal was not maintainable under Section 61 of the I&B Code. The court held that the delay in filing the appeal under Section 421 was not condonable as the appeal was filed after the expiry of the limitation period (Paras 29-29).

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the appellant is entitled to condonation of delay in filing the appeal under Section 421 of the Companies Act, 2013.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The Tribunal dismissed the appeal and the delay condonation application, ruling that the appeal was barred by limitation as it was filed 53 days after the impugned order, and the delay could not be condoned under the provisions of the Companies Act.

Law Points

  • Limitation
  • Delay Condonation
  • Appeal under Companies Act
  • Transformation of Proceedings
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2026 LawText (NCLAT) (09) 205

Company Appeal (AT) No. 39 of 2026 & I.A. No. 816 of 2026

2026-09-18

Justice Sharad Kumar Sharma, Arun Baroka

Ms. Purti Gupta, Ms. Henna George, Ms. Sunidhi Sah, Mr. Siddharth Gautam, Mr. Sougat Sinha, Mr. R. Gayathri Manasa, Mr. Asav Rajan, Ms. Kashish Chadha

Anjaniputra Ispat Ltd.

IAG Company Ltd., Trust Estate Khimji Keshwaji

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Company appeal regarding delay in filing under the Companies Act.

Remedy Sought

Appellant sought condonation of delay in filing the appeal.

Filing Reason

Appeal filed against an order under the Companies Act, 2013.

Previous Decisions

The appeal under Section 61 of the I&B Code was found to be not maintainable.

Issues

Whether the appeal under Section 421 of the Companies Act was filed within the permissible limitation period. Whether the appellant is entitled to condonation of delay.

Submissions/Arguments

The appellant argued that the delay should be condoned based on Section 14 of the Limitation Act. The respondents contended that the appeal was filed beyond the limitation period and should not be condoned.

Ratio Decidendi

The appeal under Section 421 of the Companies Act must be filed within the specified limitation period, and the conversion of an appeal does not provide continuity in the limitation period if the original appeal was not maintainable.

Judgment Excerpts

The appeal was preferred by invoking the provisions contained under Section 61 of the I&B Code. The filing of an appeal under Section 61 on 20.11.2025 was void ab initio being not maintainable. The delay condonation application I.A. No. 7306 of 2025 would stand rejected.

Procedural History

The appellant filed an appeal under Section 61 of the I&B Code on 20.11.2025, followed by a request for amendment to convert it to an appeal under Section 421 of the Companies Act, which was granted on 29.01.2026. The appellant then filed a fresh appeal under Section 421 on 30.01.2026, which was accompanied by a delay condonation application.

Acts & Sections

  • Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016: Section 61
  • Companies Act, 2013: Section 421
  • Limitation Act, 1963: Section 14
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
Supreme Court Supreme Court Allows Appellant in Bail Appeal with Modified Conditions. The court found that imposing compensation as a bail condition was not supported by the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1908.
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Quashes Deemed Conveyance Order in Co-operative Housing Society Dispute — Lack of Notice to Original Landowner Violates Principles of Natural Justice. Deemed Conveyance under Section 11 of MOFA cannot be granted without affording ...