High Court of Rajasthan Bench at Jaipur adjudicates a batch of writ petitions involving bank accounts and cyber crime authorities. Petitions implead various banks, Reserve Bank of India, State/Union authorities, and police/cyber crime cells, but the provided excerpt does not disclose the specific legal findings or final relief.

Case Note & Summary

The High Court of Judicature for Rajasthan, Bench at Jaipur, was considering a batch of connected writ petitions. The excerpt contains only the case captions and party details for seventeen writ petitions, without any substantive legal reasoning, findings, or final orders. The lead petition was S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 2679/2026, filed by Shree Balaji Enterprises through its proprietor, and the connected matters included S.B. Civil Writ Petition Nos. 9498/2025, 19060/2025, 19610/2025, 20087/2025, 1466/2026, 1706/2026, 2704/2026, 5811/2026, 6373/2026, 8642/2026, 8815/2026, 10573/2026, 10712/2026, 11167/2026, 11329/2026, and 11368/2026. The petitioners included various proprietorship firms and individuals such as Shree Balaji Enterprises, Santosh Kumar Jain, M/s Master Indian Oil, Ramgopal Soni, KGN Goat Farm, Sanjay Jaiswal, Sikarwar Traders, Sharma Polymer and Trading, Niraj Bhatnagar, Usman Khan, Mrinal Sharma, Ashok Kumar Meena, Sabir, Ramesh Kumar Saini, Jay Verma, Ramchandra, and Shishram (incomplete). The respondents across the petitions included the Reserve Bank of India, multiple public and private sector banks such as Axis Bank Ltd., State Bank of India, Federal Bank, Yes Bank Limited, AU Small Finance Bank, Bank of Baroda, Kotak Mahindra Bank Ltd., ICICI Bank Ltd., Bombay Mercantile Co-operative Bank Ltd., IndusInd Bank, HDFC Bank Ltd., Bank of Maharashtra, Punjab National Bank, and Indian Overseas Bank. Additionally, various State and Union authorities were impleaded, including the State of Rajasthan through its Home Department, Director General of Police, Deputy Inspector General of Police (Cyber Crime), Superintendent of Police, Station House Officers from different states, and cyber crime cells in Gujarat, Karnataka, Tamil Nadu, West Bengal, Bihar, Uttar Pradesh, Maharashtra, and Andhra Pradesh. The excerpt did not provide the grounds for filing, the reliefs sought, the procedural history, the arguments advanced by the parties, the legal issues framed, the statutes relied upon, or the final decision rendered. As such, no legal principles, precedents, or ratio decidendi could be extracted from the provided text. The case details were limited to the identification of the litigants and the case numbers, which indicated a batch of writ petitions involving bank accounts and cyber crime authorities. No judge, advocate, date of judgment, citation, or paragraph references were mentioned. The only date-like information was the upload date of 20/08/2026 and download date of 17/09/2026, which did not constitute the judgment date. The judgment favor was indeterminate because no outcome was stated.

Issue of Consideration