Rajasthan High Court Hears Writ Petitions Challenging Rescission of Railway Infrastructure Contract and Subsequent Tender. Arbitrariness and Violation of Articles 14 and 19(1)(g) of Constitution Alleged in Rescission Under Clause 62 of Standard General Conditions of Contract.

High Court: Rajasthan High Court Bench: Jodhpur
  • 2
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The present judgment arises from two writ petitions filed before the High Court of Judicature for Rajasthan at Jodhpur, challenging the rescission of a railway infrastructure contract and a subsequent tender notice. The petitioner, a public limited company incorporated under the Indian Companies Act, 1956, and engaged in infrastructure development, was awarded a contract pursuant to a tender floated by the North-Western Railway for execution of works between Jaipur-Chaksu Railway Tracks/Stations in connection with the Jaipur-Sawai Madhopur Doubling Project. The Letter of Acceptance dated 10.10.2024 stipulated a 24-month period, with 15 months for the Chaksu-Sheodaspura section and 9 months thereafter for station buildings. The formal agreement was executed on 25.03.2025 retrospectively. The petitioner furnished bank guarantees from Punjab National Bank and Bank of Baroda, along with an indemnity bond. The central grievance is the rescission of contract by order dated 13.01.2026, purportedly under Clause 62 of the Standard General Conditions of Contract. The petitioner alleges that the delay in execution was attributable to the respondents' failure to provide approved drawings, hindrance-free sites, NOCs, right-to-way, and removal of encroachments. Despite repeated communications dated 24.01.2025, 10.02.2025, 06.03.2025, and 07.04.2025, the respondents did not resolve the issues and instead issued a notice dated 29.04.2025 alleging slow progress. The petitioner filed S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 983/2026 seeking quashing of the rescission order, restoration of contract, and restraint on invocation of bank guarantees; and S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 8878/2026 seeking quashing of the Notice Inviting Tender dated 06.05.2026 and related reliefs. The court heard arguments on 21.07.2026 and reserved judgment, pronouncing on 17.08.2026. The provided judgment text, however, ends mid-sentence at paragraph 10 during petitioner's submissions, and therefore the final decision, reasoning, and directions are not available in the excerpt.

Issue of Consideration

Whether the rescission order dated 13.01.2026 passed under Clause 62 of Standard General Conditions of Contract is arbitrary, non-speaking, and violative of Articles 14 and 19(1)(g) of the Constitution of India; Whether the subsequent Notice Inviting Tender dated 06.05.2026 is illegal and liable to be quashed as consequential to the illegal rescission; Whether the respondents should be restrained from invoking bank guarantees and proceeding with the tender during pendency.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Case Details

2026 LawText (RAJ) (08) 25

S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 983/2026 (Connected with S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 8878/2026)

2026-08-17

Sameer Jain

For Petitioner: Mr. Samar Bansal, Sr. Advocate assisted by Mr. Himanshu Choudhary, Mr. Additya Soni, Mr. Pradyuman Singh, Mr. Reddy Amar, Mr. Aditya Choudhary, Mr. Sachin Vyas, Mr. Naresh Tak; For Respondents: Mr. Bharat Vyas, ASG, Mr. Vaibhav Bhansali, Mr. B.P. Bohra, Sr. CGC, Ms. Divyanshi Thanvi, Mr. Dharmendra Sharma, Chief Legal Advisor, Mr. B.R. Jat, Chief Legal Advisor, Mr. Manish Padmawat, Dy. Chief Engineer-V, Jaipur, Mr. Santosh Kumar Meena, Dy. Chief Engineer, Bikaner, Mr. Vijay Pal, Executive Engineer, Bikaner, Mr. Praveen Kumar, Assistant Engineer, Jaipur

Vishnu Prakash R Punglia Ltd., Through Its Authorized Signatory Jayant Punglia S/o Manohar Lal Punglia

Union of India, Through General Manager, North-Western Railway, Jaipur, Rajasthan; Chief Administrative Officer (Construction), North-Western Railway, Jaipur, Rajasthan; Chief Engineer (Construction) III, North-Western Railway, Jaipur, Rajasthan; Deputy Chief Engineer (Construction)-V, North-Western Railway, Jaipur, Rajasthan

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Writ petitions under Article 226 of Constitution of India challenging rescission of a railway infrastructure contract and subsequent Notice Inviting Tender.

Remedy Sought

Quashing of rescission order dated 13.01.2026; restoration of contract; restraint on invocation of bank guarantees; quashing of NIT dated 06.05.2026; declaration that consequential actions are void ab initio.

Filing Reason

Respondents rescinded the contract vide order dated 13.01.2026 despite petitioner alleging that delays were caused by respondents' failure to provide drawings, clear sites, NOCs, and remove impediments.

Issues

Whether the rescission order dated 13.01.2026 passed under Clause 62 of Standard General Conditions of Contract is arbitrary, non-speaking, and violative of Articles 14 and 19(1)(g) of the Constitution of India Whether the subsequent Notice Inviting Tender dated 06.05.2026 is illegal and liable to be quashed as consequential to the illegal rescission Whether the respondents should be restrained from invoking bank guarantees and proceeding with the tender during pendency

Submissions/Arguments

Petitioner contended that respondents failed to provide approved drawings, clear and hindrance-free work sites, necessary NOCs and approvals, and failed to remove encroachments and other impediments obstructing execution of the work. Petitioner asserted that despite repeated communications dated 24.01.2025, 10.02.2025, 06.03.2025 and 07.04.2025, the respondents did not resolve the issues and instead issued a notice dated 29.04.2025 alleging unsatisfactory progress. Petitioner argued that the delay in execution was attributable to the respondents' failure to discharge their corresponding contractual obligations, including furnishing approved drawings, providing hindrance-free sites, securing NOCs, right to way, and obtaining approvals.

Judgment Excerpts

The immediate cause giving rise to the present proceedings is the rescission of the contract vide order dated 13.01.2026. The petitioner contends that the impugned action has been taken notwithstanding the fact that it had been continuously and diligently undertaking execution of the contracted work. In particular, the respondents failed to provide requisite and approved drawings, clear and hindrance-free work sites, necessary NOCs and approvals, and failed to remove encroachments and other impediments obstructing execution of the work.

Procedural History

Two writ petitions filed; S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 983/2026 identified as lead case with consent; arguments concluded on 21/07/2026; judgment reserved on 21/07/2026; pronounced on 17/08/2026.

Acts & Sections

  • Constitution of India: Article 14, Article 19(1)(g)
  • Indian Companies Act, 1956:
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
Supreme Court Supreme Court Allows Union of India's Appeal Against Tribunal's Order Setting Aside Discharge of Airman for Habitual Indiscipline. Second Warning Not Mandatory Under Habitual Offenders Policy When Competent Authority Decides to Discharge Without Givi...
Related Judgement
Supreme Court Supreme Court Directs Phased Payment of Arrears to Regional Rural Bank Employees under National Industrial Tribunal Award. Modified Scheme Approved with Instalments and No Interest, Balancing Employee Entitlements and Financial Viability of Sponsorin...