Supreme Court Directs Phased Payment of Arrears to Regional Rural Bank Employees under National Industrial Tribunal Award. Modified Scheme Approved with Instalments and No Interest, Balancing Employee Entitlements and Financial Viability of Sponsoring Banks.

  • 0
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The matter arose out of applications for directions filed in two writ petitions pending before the Supreme Court, in which employees' associations representing the staff of Regional Rural Banks had originally sought parity in emoluments with nationalized commercial banks. The litigation spanned nearly a decade and involved the implementation of an industrial award concerning wage scales and arrears. The Supreme Court had earlier disposed of the writ petitions on September 1, 1987 by directing the Central Government to constitute a National Industrial Tribunal to adjudicate the pay, allowances, and benefits of Regional Rural Bank employees. The Tribunal was constituted on November 26, 1987 and delivered its award on April 30, 1990, holding that up to August 31, 1987 the employees should receive pay scales and allowances comparable to State Government employees in similar posts, and from September 1, 1987 they should be placed on par with employees of corresponding levels in their respective sponsor banks. The Tribunal left the equation of posts to the Government of India, which appointed an Equation Committee, accepted its report, and issued implementing circulars on February 22, 1991. Although salaries were paid in revised scales from January 1, 1991, arrears for the earlier period remained unpaid. The total liability was stated to be about Rs. 220 crores. The applicants approached the Supreme Court seeking directions for implementation of the award and payment of arrears. On September 12, 1994 the Court directed the Union of India and NABARD to prepare a scheme in consultation with the employees' association. A committee under K. Basu submitted a scheme on February 22, 1995 proposing payment of arrears in instalments, with funding by soft loans from the Government of India and a moratorium on repayment. The Union of India, through an affidavit dated February 20, 1996, opposed the loan route as infeasible and inappropriate, citing the varying financial condition of Regional Rural Banks, the need for equity infusion as part of a restructuring package, and the strain on budgetary resources. It proposed that 53 identified Regional Rural Banks pay arrears as per the Basu Committee scheme, that at least 50 more banks be identified for restructuring and commence payment within six months, and that the remaining banks pay in four equal annual instalments. The core legal issues before the Court were whether the Tribunal award had been implemented as to arrears, what scheme should govern discharge of the liability, and whether interest should be payable. The Court, after considering the Basu Committee report and the Union of India's affidavit, directed a phased discharge of arrears up to December 30, 1990. It ordered that 53 banks pay as per the Basu Committee scheme effective February 20, 1996; that banks in the second category pay as per the scheme effective August 20, 1996; and that the remaining banks pay in four instalments of 25% each, with the first payable by August 20, 1997 and subsequent instalments yearly. For employees who retired or deceased before the scheme, lump sum payment was directed; for those retiring after, two instalments. The Court clarified that no interest would be payable on the arrears, thereby balancing the employees' right to arrears with the financial viability of the banks and the government's fiscal constraints. The judgment thus provided a comprehensive administrative scheme for clearing the outstanding dues while acknowledging the need for restructuring weaker Regional Rural Banks.

Headnote

A) Labour Law - Wage Parity for Regional Rural Bank Employees - Implementation of National Industrial Tribunal Award - Regional Rural Banks Act, 1976 - The National Industrial Tribunal award dated April 30, 1990 directed that Regional Rural Bank employees receive pay scales and allowances comparable to State Government employees up to August 31, 1987 and parity with sponsor bank employees from September 1, 1987. The Supreme Court supervised implementation and directed that arrears be paid in accordance with a scheme; the award constituted a binding obligation requiring discharge of arrears.

B) Labour Law - Payment of Arrears - Phased Instalment Scheme Based on Financial Viability - Regional Rural Banks Act, 1976 - The Court considered the Basu Committee report dated February 22, 1995 and the Union of India's affidavit dated February 20, 1996 proposing categorization of Regional Rural Banks into restructuring, profit-making, and remaining banks. Held that 53 identified banks pay as per Basu scheme operative February 20, 1996; at least 50 more banks pay as per scheme operative August 20, 1996; remaining banks pay in four equal annual instalments of 25% starting August 20, 1997.

C) Labour Law - Interest on Arrears - Denial of Interest on Delayed Payment - Regional Rural Banks Act, 1976 - The applicants sought payment of arrears, while the Union of India pleaded financial infeasibility of providing loans. The Court balanced revenue constraints and viability of Regional Rural Banks with employee entitlements and directed that no interest shall be payable on the arrears.

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the directions issued by the National Industrial Tribunal in its award dated April 30, 1990 regarding pay parity and arrears for Regional Rural Bank employees were being properly implemented, and what scheme should be approved for payment of arrears including instalments and interest.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The Supreme Court directed that the liability for payment of arrears to Regional Rural Bank employees for the period up to December 30, 1990 be discharged as follows: 53 identified banks pay as per Basu Committee scheme operative from February 20, 1996; banks under para 4(ii) pay as per scheme operative from August 20, 1996; remaining banks pay in four equal annual instalments of 25% starting August 20, 1997; employees in categories (b) and (c) of Basu Committee report paid lump sum by specified dates; employees in categories (d) and (e) paid in two instalments according to bank category; no interest payable on arrears.

Law Points

  • Regional Rural Banks Act
  • 1976
  • National Industrial Tribunal Award
  • Implementation of Wage Award
  • Payment of Arrears in Instalments
  • No Interest on Arrears
  • Financial Viability of Banks
  • Employee Parity
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

1996 LawText (SC) (04) 140

I.A. Nos. 1 & 2 in Writ Petition (Civil) No. 7149-50 of 1982 and Writ Petition No. 132 of 1984

1996-04-12

S.C. Agrawal, G.T. Nanavati

JT 1996 (5) 606, 1996 SCALE (3) 491

G.S. Kaushik & Anr.

Union of India & Ors.

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Applications for directions filed in writ petitions pending before the Supreme Court seeking implementation of a National Industrial Tribunal award regarding pay parity and arrears for Regional Rural Bank employees.

Remedy Sought

Applicants sought directions for implementation of the Tribunal award, specifically payment of arrears to employees of Regional Rural Banks.

Filing Reason

Non-payment of arrears payable to Regional Rural Bank employees in terms of the award of the National Industrial Tribunal and the accepted Equation Committee report.

Previous Decisions

Writ petitions disposed on 1987-09-01 directing Central Government to refer dispute to National Industrial Tribunal; Tribunal constituted 1987-11-26; Tribunal award 1990-04-30; Equation Committee appointed 1990-10-05, report accepted 1991-01-08; Supreme Court order 1994-09-12 directed scheme; Basu Committee report 1995-02-22.

Issues

Whether the National Industrial Tribunal award dated April 30, 1990 had been properly implemented regarding payment of arrears to Regional Rural Bank employees. What scheme should be approved for discharging the arrears liability, considering the Basu Committee report and the Union of India's modified proposal. Whether interest should be payable on the arrears amount.

Submissions/Arguments

Applicants contended that the Tribunal award had not been implemented and arrears of about Rs. 220 crores remained unpaid. Union of India submitted that providing loans to Regional Rural Banks was infeasible and inappropriate, and proposed restructuring via equity infusion with phased payment based on financial categories. Union of India suggested that 53 Regional Rural Banks pay as per Basu scheme, at least 50 more pay as per scheme within six months, and remaining pay in four equal annual instalments.

Ratio Decidendi

The Court, in exercise of its supervisory jurisdiction over implementation of the National Industrial Tribunal award, approved a phased payment scheme for arrears that balanced employee entitlements with the financial viability of Regional Rural Banks. The Court directed that no interest be payable on arrears, considering the government's fiscal constraints and the need to restructure weaker banks.

Judgment Excerpts

The Tribunal gave its award dated April 30, 1990, wherein the Tribunal has held that upto August 31, 1987 the employees of RRBs should be extended the pay scale and allowances as are admissible to the State Government employees in comparable posts and status and that with effect from September 1, 1987 the said employees shall be entitled to the pay scales, allowances and other benefits on par with the employees of comparable levels in corresponding posts of respective sponsor banks. No interest will be payable on amount of arrears to be paid as per these directions. 53 RRBs, as mentioned in para 4(i) of the affidavit of Shri sudhir Srivastava shall make payment as per the scheme suggested by Basu Committee in its report dated February 22, 1995.

Procedural History

The writ petitions were disposed of by the Supreme Court on 1987-09-01, directing the Central Government to refer the dispute to a National Industrial Tribunal. The Tribunal was constituted on 1987-11-26 and gave its award on 1990-04-30. The Government appointed an Equation Committee on 1990-10-05; its report was accepted on 1991-01-08 and implementing circulars issued 1991-02-22. Applications for directions were filed seeking implementation of the award, mainly payment of arrears. By order dated 1994-09-12, the Supreme Court directed the Union of India and NABARD to prepare a scheme. Basu Committee submitted its report on 1995-02-22. The Union of India filed an affidavit dated 1996-02-20 proposing modifications. The present judgment on 1996-04-12 issued directions for phased payment of arrears.

Acts & Sections

  • Regional Rural Banks Act, 1976:
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Grants Permanent Injunction in Trademark Infringement Suit — Macleods Pharmaceuticals Ltd. v. Swisskem Healthcare & Anr. — 'PANDERM' and 'POLYDERM+' Held Deceptively Similar. The Court held that the marks are structurally and ph...
Related Judgement
Supreme Court Supreme Court Dismisses Power Trust's Appeal Against CIRP Initiation for Appellant(s), Upholds NCLAT Order Admitting Section 7 IBC Application Due to Default and Non-Compliance with Restructuring Conditions