Madras High Court Considers Challenge to Termination of Maternity Assistant Over Alleged Fake Certificate. Petitioner Claims Protection Under Article 311 as Corporation is State Under Article 12, and Natural Justice Violated.

High Court: Madras High Court Bench: Principal
  • 6
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The petitioner, K. Mary Agnes Anitha, was appointed as a Maternity Assistant at Citar Garden Hospital, Kanyakumari District, on 13.12.2010, under the Arasu Rubber Corporation Ltd., a Government of Tamil Nadu undertaking. On 21.12.2018, the respondent issued a show cause notice alleging that she had produced a fake certificate for her appointment. The petitioner submitted her explanation on 07.01.2019, refuting the allegation and stating that her registration certificate was validly issued by the Andhra Pradesh Nurses, Midwives, Auxiliary Nurses-Midwives & Health Visitors Council under the Andhra Pradesh Nurses and Midwives (Extension Amendment) Act, 1964, after undergoing 15 months of training. Without considering her explanation, the respondent passed the impugned order on 29.01.2019 terminating her service, which contained no reasons. The petitioner challenged this termination by way of a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India before the Madurai Bench of Madras High Court. She contended that the Corporation is a State under Article 12, making her a government servant entitled to protection under Article 311, and that mere issuance of a show cause notice and obtaining an explanation was insufficient for a major penalty like removal from service. The respondent argued that the show cause notice was based on a letter from the Tamil Nadu Nurses and Midwives Council dated 06.12.2018. The judgment text available is incomplete and does not include the court's analysis or final decision.

Headnote

A) Service Law - Termination of Service - Natural Justice - Constitution of India, Articles 12, 311 - Petitioner, a Maternity Assistant, was terminated on the ground of producing a fake certificate without a proper inquiry or a reasoned order; the termination order did not consider her explanation. The court's decision and reasoning are not available in the provided text. (Paras 2-4)

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the termination order dated 29.01.2019 is illegal for being passed without considering the explanation and without reasons, and whether the petitioner is entitled to protection under Article 311 of the Constitution of India.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Law Points

  • natural justice
  • reasoned order in termination
  • applicability of Article 311 to employees of State corporations
  • show cause notice insufficient for major punishment
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2025 LawText (MAD) (02) 85

W.P.(MD) No.3355 of 2019

2025-02-19

M.JOTHIRAMAN, J

2025:MHC:536

For Petitioner: Mr.C.Venkatesh Kumar, M/s.Ajmal Associates; For Respondent: Mr.A.K.Manikkam, Standing Counsel

K.Mary Agnes Anitha

The Managing Director, Arasu Rubber Corporation Ltd.

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Writ petition seeking certiorari to quash termination order

Remedy Sought

Petitioner seeks to quash the termination order dated 29.01.2019 issued by the respondent

Filing Reason

Termination based on allegation of producing a fake certificate without proper consideration of her explanation

Issues

Whether the termination order dated 29.01.2019 is illegal for being passed without considering the explanation and without reasons? Whether the petitioner is entitled to protection under Article 311 of the Constitution of India as the respondent is a State under Article 12?

Submissions/Arguments

Petitioner argued that she is a government servant, the Corporation is a State under Article 12, and she is entitled to Article 311 protection; mere show cause notice is insufficient for major punishment. Respondent argued that based on the Tamil Nadu Nurses and Midwives Council letter, a show cause notice was issued and she was directed to submit explanation.

Judgment Excerpts

Under assail is the termination order, passed by the respondent, dated 29.01.2019. The order of termination did not contain any reason as to why the explanation submitted by the petitioner lacked merit. the petitioner was deemed to be a Government servant for all purposes, as the Corporation was a State within the meaning of Article 12 of the Constitution of India.

Procedural History

Petitioner filed W.P.(MD) No.3355 of 2019 before the Madurai Bench of Madras High Court under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, seeking a writ of certiorari to quash the termination order dated 29.01.2019. No prior proceedings mentioned.

Acts & Sections

  • Constitution of India: Articles 226, 12, 311
  • Andhra Pradesh Nurses and Midwives (Extension Amendment) Act, 1964:
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Madras High Court Considers Challenge to Termination of Maternity Assistant Over Alleged Fake Certificate. Petitioner Claims Protection Under Article 311 as Corporation is State Under Article 12, and Natural Justice Violated.
Related Judgement
Supreme Court Supreme Court Allows CMDA Appeal in Premium FSI Charges Dispute — Guideline Value Prevailing on Date of Approval Governs Levy. Builder's Application for Additional FSI Does Not Confer Right to Pre-Revised Rate.