Search Results for "Maternity Assistant"

34 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 34 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Madras High Court Allows Maternity Leave for Third Child Under G.O.Ms.No.84 — Fundamental Rule 101(A) Not Applicable. Court holds that beneficial government order providing 365 days maternity leave does not restrict to first two children, overriding Fundamental Rule 101(A).

The petitioner, S.Divya, is an Office Assistant serving in the Court of Judicial Magistrate, Fast Track Court Magisterial Level, Poonamallee. She has ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court Allows Writ Petition for Maternity Benefits Under Maternity Benefit Act 1961 -- Contractual Doctor Granted Maternity Leave Despite Municipal Corporation's Denial Based on Contractual Status

The High Court of Bombay allowed a writ petition filed by Petitioner, a contractual Assistant Professor at Seth G.S. Medical College and K.E.M. Hospit...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Madras High Court Examines Termination Order of Maternity Assistant for Alleged Fake Certificate. Petitioner Contends Violation of Principles of Natural Justice and Seeks Quashing Under Article 226.

The matter arose from a writ petition filed by a Maternity Assistant challenging her termination order. The petitioner was initially appointed on 13.1...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Madras High Court Considers Challenge to Termination of Maternity Assistant Over Alleged Fake Certificate. Petitioner Claims Protection Under Article 311 as Corporation is State Under Article 12, and Natural Justice Violated.

The petitioner, K. Mary Agnes Anitha, was appointed as a Maternity Assistant at Citar Garden Hospital, Kanyakumari District, on 13.12.2010, under the ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Maternity Leave for Mother Through Surrogacy Under Maternity Benefit Act, 1961. The court held that the Maternity Benefit Act, 1961 is a beneficial legislation and must be interpreted purposively to include a commissioning mother who has a child through surrogacy.

The petitioner, Dr. Hema Vijay Menon, a lecturer, lost her only son in 2010. After unsuccessful IVF attempts, she opted for surrogacy. In March 2013, ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Removal of Employee in Disciplinary Proceeding for Violation of Natural Justice and Proportionality. Charge-sheet and Penalty Set Aside Due to Non-Supply of Documents and Disproportionate Punishment.

The petitioner, Abha Chawla Mohanty, was an employee of the Oriental Insurance Co. Ltd. appointed in October 1985. She was served with a charge-sheet ...