Supreme Court Allows Workmen's Appeal in Industrial Dispute Over Retrenchment Compensation - Held That Section 25-FF of Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 Does Not Apply When There Is No Transfer of Undertaking.

In Favour of Accused
  • 1
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The appeal arose from a common judgment of the Allahabad High Court dated 23.5.2003 in Writ Petition No.9498 of 1981 filed by the management (first respondent) and Writ Petition No.10321 of 1981 filed by the workmen (appellants). The High Court allowed the management's writ petition and dismissed the workmen's writ petition, both challenging the award dated 31.3.1981 of the Labour Court at Bareilly in Adjudication Case No.95 of 1979. The Labour Court had held that the workmen were entitled to retrenchment compensation under Section 25-FF of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947. The management contended that there was no transfer of the undertaking and that the business was closed, so Section 25-FF did not apply. The workmen argued that they were entitled to compensation. The Supreme Court analyzed the facts and found that the employer had closed its business and there was no transfer of the undertaking. The Court held that Section 25-FF applies only when there is a transfer of the undertaking, and not in cases of closure. Therefore, the workmen were not entitled to compensation under Section 25-FF but were entitled to retrenchment compensation under Section 25-F. The Court allowed the appeal, set aside the High Court's judgment, and restored the Labour Court's award with modification that the compensation was under Section 25-F.

Headnote

A) Industrial Law - Retrenchment Compensation - Section 25-FF of Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 - Applicability - The court considered whether workmen are entitled to retrenchment compensation under Section 25-FF when the employer closed its business without any transfer of undertaking - Held that Section 25-FF applies only when there is a transfer of the undertaking, and not in cases of closure - The workmen were entitled to compensation under Section 25-F for retrenchment due to closure (Paras 1-10).

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the workmen are entitled to retrenchment compensation under Section 25-FF of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, when the employer closed its business and there was no transfer of the undertaking.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

Appeal allowed. High Court judgment set aside. Labour Court award restored with modification that compensation is under Section 25-F of Industrial Disputes Act, 1947.

Law Points

  • Section 25-FF of Industrial Disputes Act
  • 1947
  • applicability only on transfer of undertaking
  • closure of business
  • retrenchment compensation
  • workmen's entitlement
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2014 LawText (SC) (01) 134

Civil Appeal No. 1762 of 2007

2007-05-23

H.L. Gokhale

Mr. R.D. Upadhyay, Mr. Sunny Chaudhary

J.H. Patel (D) By LRs. and Ors.

Nuboard Manufacturing Co. Ltd. and Ors.

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Civil appeal against High Court judgment in writ petitions challenging Labour Court award on retrenchment compensation.

Remedy Sought

Workmen sought restoration of Labour Court award granting retrenchment compensation under Section 25-FF.

Filing Reason

Workmen challenged High Court's dismissal of their writ petition and allowance of management's writ petition.

Previous Decisions

Labour Court at Bareilly in Adjudication Case No.95 of 1979 awarded compensation under Section 25-FF. High Court of Allahabad allowed management's writ petition and dismissed workmen's writ petition.

Issues

Whether Section 25-FF of Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 applies when there is no transfer of undertaking but closure of business. Whether workmen are entitled to retrenchment compensation under Section 25-FF or Section 25-F.

Submissions/Arguments

Appellants (workmen) argued that they are entitled to retrenchment compensation under Section 25-FF. Respondents (management) argued that there was no transfer of undertaking, only closure, so Section 25-FF does not apply.

Ratio Decidendi

Section 25-FF of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 applies only when there is a transfer of the undertaking. In case of closure, workmen are entitled to retrenchment compensation under Section 25-F, not Section 25-FF.

Judgment Excerpts

Section 25-FF applies only when there is a transfer of the undertaking, and not in cases of closure.

Procedural History

Labour Court at Bareilly passed award on 31.3.1981 in Adjudication Case No.95 of 1979. Both management and workmen filed writ petitions in Allahabad High Court. High Court allowed management's writ petition and dismissed workmen's writ petition on 23.5.2003. Workmen appealed to Supreme Court.

Acts & Sections

  • Industrial Disputes Act, 1947: 25-FF, 25-F
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
Supreme Court Supreme Court Allows Workmen's Appeal in Industrial Dispute Over Retrenchment Compensation - Held That Section 25-FF of Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 Does Not Apply When There Is No Transfer of Undertaking.
Related Judgement
High Court High Court of Bombay at Aurangabad Allows Revision Application in Civil Suit for Recovery of Rent — Order VII Rule 11 CPC Application for Rejection of Plaint Dismissed by Trial Court Set Aside. Plaint Rejected for Lack of Cause of Action as Lease A...