High Court of Karnataka Quashes Interest Demand in ESI Act Case for Violation of Natural Justice. Failure to Issue Show Cause Notice Before Determining Interest Under Section 39(5) of Employees' State Insurance Act, 1948 Renders Order Unsustainable.

High Court: Karnataka High Court Bench: BENGALURU In Favour of Accused
  • 2
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The petitioner, M/s. St. John's Medical College Hospital, an establishment covered under the Employees' State Insurance Act, 1948, challenged an order dated 3.9.2012 passed by the Deputy Director, ESI Corporation, determining interest of Rs. 7,51,499/- for delayed payment of contributions, and a subsequent demand notice dated 4.12.2012. The petitioner contended that no show cause notice was issued before determining the interest amount, violating principles of natural justice. The respondents argued that in light of the Supreme Court judgment in M/s. Goetze (India) Ltd. v. Employees' State Insurance Corporation, no show cause notice was necessary. The High Court examined the issue and held that the judgment in Goetze (India) Ltd. does not dispense with the requirement of a show cause notice. The court observed that the power under Section 39(5) of the ESI Act to determine interest must be exercised after affording an opportunity of hearing to the establishment. Since no show cause notice was issued, the impugned order and demand notice were quashed. The court allowed the writ petition and set aside the orders, leaving it open to the respondents to initiate fresh proceedings after issuing a show cause notice.

Headnote

A) Administrative Law - Natural Justice - Show Cause Notice - Employees' State Insurance Act, 1948, Section 39(5) - The court held that before determining interest under Section 39(5) of the ESI Act, a show cause notice must be issued to the establishment to afford an opportunity of hearing. The impugned order and demand notice were quashed for violation of principles of natural justice. (Paras 3-4)

B) Employees' State Insurance - Interest - Section 39(5) - Employees' State Insurance Act, 1948 - The court held that the judgment in M/s. Goetze (India) Ltd. v. Employees' State Insurance Corporation does not dispense with the requirement of a show cause notice before determining interest. The order determining interest without notice is unsustainable. (Paras 3-4)

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the order determining interest under Section 39(5) of the Employees' State Insurance Act, 1948 without issuing a show cause notice to the establishment is sustainable in law.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

Writ petition allowed. Impugned order dated 3.9.2012 and demand notice dated 4.12.2012 are quashed. Respondents are at liberty to initiate fresh proceedings after issuing show cause notice to the petitioner.

Law Points

  • Natural justice
  • Show cause notice
  • Interest determination
  • Section 39(5) ESI Act
  • 1948
  • Quashing of demand
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2013 LawText (KAR) (09) 4

Writ Petition No. 3088 of 2013 (L-ESI)

2013-09-10

Justice Ram Mohan Reddy

Sri. S N Murthy (for petitioner), Sri. V Narasimha Holla (for respondents)

M/s. St. John's Medical College Hospital

The Director, Employees' State Insurance Corporation & Another

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Writ petition under Article 226 of Constitution challenging order determining interest and demand notice under ESI Act.

Remedy Sought

Quashing of order dated 3.9.2012 and demand notice dated 4.12.2012.

Filing Reason

Petitioner aggrieved by determination of interest without show cause notice.

Issues

Whether the order determining interest under Section 39(5) of ESI Act without show cause notice is sustainable.

Submissions/Arguments

Petitioner: No show cause notice was issued before determining interest, violating principles of natural justice. Respondents: In light of Supreme Court judgment in M/s. Goetze (India) Ltd., no show cause notice is required.

Ratio Decidendi

Before determining interest under Section 39(5) of the Employees' State Insurance Act, 1948, a show cause notice must be issued to the establishment to afford an opportunity of hearing. The judgment in M/s. Goetze (India) Ltd. does not dispense with this requirement.

Judgment Excerpts

Petitioner – an establishment covered under the Employees' State Insurance Corporation Act, 1948, aggrieved by the order dated 3.9.2012 Annexure-A of the Deputy Director, Employees' State Insurance Corporation, determining Rs.7,51,499/- as interest... Such a due, it is stated, is contemplated under sub-section (5) of Section 39 of the Employees' State Insurance Act, 1948.

Procedural History

Petitioner filed writ petition under Article 226 of Constitution challenging order dated 3.9.2012 and demand notice dated 4.12.2012. Respondents filed statement of objections. Heard and disposed of on 10.9.2013.

Acts & Sections

  • Employees' State Insurance Act, 1948: Section 39(5)
  • Constitution of India: Article 226
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court High Court of Karnataka Quashes Interest Demand in ESI Act Case for Violation of Natural Justice. Failure to Issue Show Cause Notice Before Determining Interest Under Section 39(5) of Employees' State Insurance Act, 1948 Renders Order Unsustainable.
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Dismisses State Appeal Against Acquittal in MRTP Act Case — Notice Under Section 53(1) Must Be Served on the Person Actually Using the Premises, Not the Owner Alone.