Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition for RTE Admission Due to False Address Declaration. Court upholds school's rejection of admission after physical verification revealed the residential address furnished by the petitioner did not exist, emphasizing the importance of truthful declarations under the Right of Children to Free and Compulsory Education Act, 2009.

High Court: Bombay High Court Bench: NAGPUR
  • 1
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The petitioner, a minor child through his father, filed a writ petition seeking a direction to grant admission to KG-I in respondent No.2 School under the Right of Children to Free and Compulsory Education Act, 2009 (RTE Act). The petitioner had applied for admission under the RTE Act for the academic year 2025-26 and was provisionally allotted the school. During physical verification of the residential address furnished in the online application, the verification team found that the house mentioned did not exist. Consequently, the school rejected the admission. The petitioner challenged this rejection. The court considered the issue of whether the petitioner is entitled to admission when the address was false. The court noted that the RTE Act requires truthful declarations and that the school's verification process was proper. The court dismissed the petition, holding that the petitioner cannot claim admission based on a false address. The decision was pronounced on 03.07.2026 by a division bench of the Bombay High Court at Nagpur.

Headnote

A) Right to Education - Admission under RTE Act - False Declaration - Right of Children to Free and Compulsory Education Act, 2009 - The petitioner sought admission for his child under the RTE Act but furnished a residential address that was found non-existent during physical verification. The court held that the school was justified in rejecting the admission as the declaration was false, and the petitioner cannot claim benefit of the Act based on a false address. (Paras 2-5)

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the petitioner is entitled to admission under the RTE Act when the residential address furnished in the application was found to be non-existent during physical verification.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The writ petition is dismissed. The court held that the school was justified in rejecting the admission as the declaration of address was false.

Law Points

  • Right to education
  • False declaration
  • Admission under RTE Act
  • Physical verification
  • Duty of parents to provide correct information
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2026 LawText (BOM) (07) 174

Writ Petition No. 2394 of 2026

2026-07-03

Urmila Joshi Phalke, Nivedita P. Mehta

2026:BHC-NAG:8372-DB

Shri Amit S. Kinkhede (for petitioner), Shri Amit Chutke (APP for State), Shri M.G. Bhangade (Senior Advocate assisted by Shri Ninad Lande for respondent no.2), Shri Gopal Mishra (for respondent no.9), Shri Harshwardhan Chawhan (for respondent no.8)

Master Azlanuddin S/o Mohammad Salauddin Sharfuddin, through his father Mr. Mohammad S/o Salauddin Sharfuddin

The State of Maharashtra, Principal of Bhartiya Vidya Bhavan's Bhagwandas Purohit Vidya Mandir, The Maharashtra Prathamik Shikshan Parishad, The Director of Primary Education, The Commissioner of Education, The Education Officer (Primary) Nagpur Municipal Corporation, The Government of India, The Central Board of Secondary Education, The Education Officer (Primary) Zilla Parishad Nagpur

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Writ petition seeking direction for admission under RTE Act.

Remedy Sought

Direction to grant admission to KG-I in respondent No.2 School under the RTE Act.

Filing Reason

The petitioner's child was denied admission after physical verification revealed the residential address furnished did not exist.

Issues

Whether the petitioner is entitled to admission under the RTE Act when the residential address furnished was found non-existent during physical verification.

Ratio Decidendi

A candidate seeking admission under the RTE Act must furnish a truthful residential address. If the address is found to be non-existent during physical verification, the school is justified in rejecting the admission, and the petitioner cannot claim the benefit of the Act based on a false declaration.

Judgment Excerpts

By the present writ petition, the petitioner seeks a direction to grant admission to KG-I (Junior KG) in respondent No.2-School under the provisions of the Right of Children to Free and Compulsory Education Act, 2009. During the course of physical verification of the residential address furnished by the petitioner in the online application, the verification team found that the house mentioned in the application did not exist.

Procedural History

The petitioner applied for admission under RTE Act for academic year 2025-26, was provisionally allotted respondent No.2 School, but admission was rejected after physical verification revealed the address did not exist. The petitioner then filed the present writ petition.

Acts & Sections

  • Right of Children to Free and Compulsory Education Act, 2009:
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Allows Compassionate Appointees' Petitions Against Requirement of Tribe Validity Certificate. Compassionate Appointment Is Not a Reservation Benefit, Hence No Need for Caste Validity Certificate Under the Maharashtra Caste Certifica...
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition for RTE Admission Due to False Address Declaration. Court upholds school's rejection of admission after physical verification revealed the residential address furnished by the petitioner did not exist, emphasizing...