High Court of Karnataka Allows Appeal in Workmen's Compensation Case — Insurance Company Liable for Employee Death Under Motor Vehicles Act. Section 147 of Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 covers risk of employee as 'any person' engaged in loading/unloading, overriding Workmen's Compensation Commissioner's dismissal.

High Court: Karnataka High Court Bench: BENGALURU In Favour of Accused
  • 48
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The present appeal was filed by the appellants/claimants challenging the order and award dated 30.01.2012 passed by the Labour Officer and Workmen's Compensation Commissioner, Davanagere, dismissing the claim petition for compensation. The factum of the accident and the death of the deceased in the accident were not in dispute. The deceased was a Coolie/Hamali/Loader in the lorry bearing No.KA-05/4074 under the employment of Respondent No.1 and died out of and in the course of employment. The learned counsel for the claimant submitted that the risk of the employee is compulsorily covered under Section 147 of the Motor Vehicles Act, but the Tribunal had wrongly dismissed the claim. The court heard arguments from both sides and perused the records. The court held that the risk of the employee is compulsorily covered under Section 147 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, and the Workmen's Compensation Commissioner had erred in dismissing the claim petition. The appeal was allowed, the impugned order was set aside, and the matter was remitted back to the Workmen's Compensation Commissioner for fresh consideration in accordance with law.

Headnote

A) Workmen's Compensation - Motor Vehicles Act - Section 147 - Coverage of Employee - The risk of a coolie/hamali/loader employed in a lorry is compulsorily covered under Section 147 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 as 'any person' engaged in loading or unloading. The Workmen's Compensation Commissioner erred in dismissing the claim petition. (Paras 2-4)

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the risk of a coolie/hamali/loader employed in a lorry is covered under Section 147 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, and whether the Workmen's Compensation Commissioner erred in dismissing the claim petition.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

Appeal allowed. Impugned order and award dated 30.01.2012 passed by the Labour Officer and Workmen's Compensation Commissioner, Davanagere, in No.Ka.Aa.Da/Ka.Na.Pa/CR-96/2010 is set aside. The matter is remitted back to the Workmen's Compensation Commissioner for fresh consideration in accordance with law.

Law Points

  • Section 147 of Motor Vehicles Act
  • 1988 covers risk of employee as 'any person' engaged in loading/unloading
  • Workmen's Compensation Act
  • 1923 Section 30(1)
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

NC: 2023:KHC:25046

MFA No. 6914 of 2012 (WC)

2023-07-18

Hanchate Sanjeevkumar

NC: 2023:KHC:25046

Sri. Raghu. R for Sri. S. Raghavendra (for appellants); Sri. B. Pradeep (for R2); R1 served

Sushela Devi and Paras Sahani

Manasur S and The Manager, Srirama General Insurance Co. Ltd.

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Appeal against dismissal of claim petition for compensation under Workmen's Compensation Act

Remedy Sought

Appellants sought compensation for death of employee in accident

Filing Reason

Claim petition dismissed by Workmen's Compensation Commissioner

Previous Decisions

Workmen's Compensation Commissioner dismissed claim petition on 30.01.2012 in No.Ka.Aa.Da/Ka.Na.Pa/CR-96/2010

Issues

Whether the risk of a coolie/hamali/loader employed in a lorry is covered under Section 147 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988

Submissions/Arguments

Claimant argued that deceased was a coolie/hamali/loader employed in lorry and died in course of employment, risk covered under Section 147 of Motor Vehicles Act Respondent insurance company opposed the claim

Ratio Decidendi

The risk of an employee (coolie/hamali/loader) is compulsorily covered under Section 147 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 as 'any person' engaged in loading or unloading, and the Workmen's Compensation Commissioner erred in dismissing the claim petition.

Judgment Excerpts

The factum of the accident and the death of deceased in the accident are not in dispute. The risk of the employee is compulsorily covered under Section 147 of the Motor Vehicles Act, but the Tribunal has wrongly dismissed the claim.

Procedural History

Claim petition filed before Workmen's Compensation Commissioner, Davanagere, dismissed on 30.01.2012. Appeal filed under Section 30(1) of Workmen's Compensation Act before High Court of Karnataka.

Acts & Sections

  • Motor Vehicles Act, 1988: 147
  • Workmen's Compensation Act, 1923: 30(1)
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Gujarat High Court Quashes Detention Order Under PASA Act for Lack of Material Showing Disturbance to Public Order. Preventive detention based on solitary FIR and unsubstantiated allegations of public nuisance held invalid as no credible material exi...
Related Judgement
High Court High Court of Karnataka Allows Appeal in Workmen's Compensation Case — Insurance Company Liable for Employee Death Under Motor Vehicles Act. Section 147 of Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 covers risk of employee as 'any person' engaged in loading/unloadin...