High Court Allows Appeal in Income Tax Case: Sales to Other STP Units Qualify as Deemed Export Under Section 10A of Income Tax Act, 1961. The court held that software development services provided to another STP unit, which ultimately exports the software, constitute export for deduction purposes.

High Court: Karnataka High Court Bench: BENGALURU
  • 94
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The assessee, M/s. Tata Elxsi Limited, a registered Software Technology Park (STP) unit, claimed deduction under Section 10A of the Income Tax Act, 1961, for profits from its STP unit. The Assessing Officer disallowed a portion of the deduction amounting to Rs. 4,49,09,602/- on the ground that sales made to Texas Instruments India Pvt. Ltd. (TIIPL), another STP unit, were domestic sales and not exports. The assessee contended that the software development services provided to TIIPL were ultimately exported out of India by TIIPL, and consideration was received in convertible foreign exchange, thus satisfying the conditions for deduction under Section 10A. The Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) allowed the assessee's claim, but the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) reversed the decision, holding that sales to another STP unit do not amount to deemed export. The High Court of Karnataka, in this appeal under Section 260-A of the Act, framed the substantial question of law: whether the Tribunal was correct in holding that the assessee is not entitled to the benefit of Section 10A in respect of sales to other STP units. The court noted that the assessee had provided software services to TIIPL, which was also a registered STP unit, and the software was exported out of India by TIIPL. The consideration for the services was received in convertible foreign exchange within the specified period. The court held that the definition of 'export' under Section 10A includes indirect exports through another STP unit, as long as the software is exported out of India and foreign exchange is received. The court allowed the appeal, set aside the Tribunal's order, and restored the order of the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals), thereby granting the deduction under Section 10A.

Headnote

A) Income Tax - Section 10A Deduction - Export of Computer Software - Deemed Export - The issue was whether sales to another STP unit, which subsequently exports the software, constitute export under Section 10A. The court held that such sales qualify as deemed export, as the software is ultimately exported out of India and consideration is received in convertible foreign exchange. (Paras 1-4)

B) Income Tax - Section 10A - Software Technology Park - Export Turnover - The court interpreted the definition of 'export' under Section 10A to include indirect exports through another STP unit, provided the software is exported out of India and foreign exchange is received. (Paras 2-4)

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether sales made by an STP unit to another STP unit, where the software is ultimately exported out of India by the purchaser, qualify as 'export' for the purpose of deduction under Section 10A of the Income Tax Act, 1961.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The High Court allowed the appeal, set aside the order of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, and restored the order of the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals), thereby granting the deduction under Section 10A of the Income Tax Act, 1961.

Law Points

  • Section 10A of Income Tax Act
  • 1961
  • Deemed Export
  • Software Technology Park
  • Export of Computer Software
  • Convertible Foreign Exchange
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2014 LawText (KAR) (10) 8

Income Tax Appeal No.411/2008

2014-10-20

N. Kumar, B. Manohar

Chythanya K.K (for appellant), Jeevan J. Neeralgi (for respondent)

M/s. Tata Elxsi Limited

The Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax, Circle 12(3), Bangalore

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Income tax appeal challenging the Tribunal's order denying deduction under Section 10A of the Income Tax Act, 1961.

Remedy Sought

The appellant sought to set aside the Tribunal's order and allow the deduction under Section 10A.

Filing Reason

The assessee was denied deduction under Section 10A for sales made to another STP unit, which the Revenue treated as domestic sales.

Previous Decisions

The Assessing Officer disallowed the deduction; the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) allowed it; the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal reversed the CIT(A)'s order.

Issues

Whether sales to another STP unit qualify as export under Section 10A of the Income Tax Act, 1961.

Submissions/Arguments

The assessee argued that the software services provided to TIIPL were ultimately exported out of India by TIIPL, and consideration was received in convertible foreign exchange, thus satisfying Section 10A conditions. The Revenue contended that sales to another STP unit are domestic sales and do not amount to export under Section 10A.

Ratio Decidendi

Sales made by an STP unit to another STP unit, where the software is ultimately exported out of India by the purchaser and consideration is received in convertible foreign exchange, qualify as 'export' for the purpose of deduction under Section 10A of the Income Tax Act, 1961.

Judgment Excerpts

The assessee has preferred this appeal challenging the order passed by the Tribunal holding that the assessee is not entitled to the benefit of Section 10A of the Income Tax Act in respect of sales effected by them to other STP, as it does not amount to a deemed export. The assessee stated that it provides software services to Texas Instruments India Pvt. Ltd., which is also a registered STP unit at Bangalore. The software development services are provided on a principal to principal basis and based on the purchase orders placed by TIIPL on the assessee with the instructions to bill and deliver to TIIPL. The software development work done by the assessee for TIIPL is exported out of India by TIIPL.

Procedural History

The Assessing Officer disallowed the deduction under Section 10A for sales to TIIPL. The Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) allowed the assessee's claim. The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal reversed the CIT(A)'s order. The assessee appealed to the High Court under Section 260-A of the Income Tax Act, 1961.

Acts & Sections

  • Income Tax Act, 1961: Section 10A, Section 260-A
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Madras High Court Allows Writ Appeals in Teacher Recruitment Dispute — Upholds Selection of Candidate with B.Ed. Special Education. Court holds that B.Ed. Special Education is a valid qualification for appointment as Graduate Teacher under Tamil Na...
Related Judgement
Supreme Court Supreme Court Quashes Detention Order in COFEPOSA Case Due to Non-Supply of Vital Material and Inordinate Delay in Deciding Representation. Preventive detention under Section 3(1) of COFEPOSA set aside as statements of key witness not furnished to de...