Karnataka High Court Dismisses Members' Challenge to Registration of Bye-law Amendments Under Section 10 of Karnataka Societies Registration Act, 1960 — Lack of Locus Standi. Individual members cannot challenge registration of amendments as Act provides no hearing before registration; remedy lies under Section 25 or civil suit.

High Court: Karnataka High Court Bench: BENGALURU
  • 3
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The petitioners, who are members of the 4th respondent society (Bantara Yane Nadavara Mathru Sangha), filed writ petitions under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India challenging an endorsement dated 16.09.2011 issued by the Deputy Registrar of Co-operative Societies, Dakshina Kannada District, Mangalore. The endorsement certified and registered amendments to the society's bye-laws under Section 10 of the Karnataka Societies Registration Act, 1960. The petitioners also challenged the resolution passed in a Special General Body Meeting held on 07.08.2011 at Kundapur, which proposed the amendments. Additionally, they sought a writ of mandamus directing the State Government to appoint an administrator to the society. The court examined the scope of Section 10 of the Act and the locus standi of individual members to challenge the registration of bye-law amendments. The court noted that the Registrar, while registering amendments, acts in an administrative capacity and is not required to issue notice to members or hold an inquiry. The Act does not provide for any hearing before registration. The court held that individual members have no right to challenge the registration under Section 10, as the registration is merely a ministerial act of certifying that the amendment has been duly passed by the society. The proper remedy for members aggrieved by the amendment is either to file a civil suit for declaration and injunction or to approach the Registrar under Section 25 of the Act, which provides for settlement of disputes. The court dismissed the writ petitions as not maintainable, but granted liberty to the petitioners to avail alternative remedies in accordance with law.

Headnote

A) Societies Registration Act - Locus Standi - Challenge to Registration of Bye-law Amendments - Individual members of a society cannot maintain a writ petition challenging the registration of amendments to bye-laws under Section 10 of the Karnataka Societies Registration Act, 1960, as the Act does not provide for any notice or hearing to members before such registration. The remedy for members aggrieved by the amendment lies either by way of a civil suit or by approaching the Registrar under Section 25 of the Act. (Paras 1-5)

B) Societies Registration Act - Registrar's Power - Section 10 - Registration of Bye-law Amendments - The Registrar, while registering amendments under Section 10 of the Karnataka Societies Registration Act, 1960, acts in an administrative capacity and is not required to issue notice to members or hold an inquiry. The registration is a ministerial act of certifying that the amendment has been duly passed by the society. (Paras 3-4)

C) Societies Registration Act - Remedy - Section 25 - Members aggrieved by any act of the society or its office bearers may approach the Registrar under Section 25 of the Karnataka Societies Registration Act, 1960, or file a civil suit for declaration and injunction. A writ petition under Article 226 is not maintainable for such disputes. (Para 5)

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether individual members of a society registered under the Karnataka Societies Registration Act, 1960 have the locus standi to challenge the registration of amendments to the bye-laws by the Registrar under Section 10 of the Act.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The writ petitions are dismissed as not maintainable. However, liberty is reserved to the petitioners to avail such remedies as are available to them in accordance with law, including approaching the Registrar under Section 25 of the Karnataka Societies Registration Act, 1960 or filing a civil suit.

Law Points

  • Standing of individual members to challenge registration of bye-law amendments under Section 10 of Karnataka Societies Registration Act
  • 1960
  • Scope of Registrar's power under Section 10
  • Remedy for members aggrieved by bye-law amendments lies under Section 25 of the Act or civil suit
  • No requirement of notice or hearing before registration of amendments
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2014 LawText (KAR) (09) 20

W.P.Nos.37570-71/2011 (GM-KSR)

2014-09-04

B.S. Patil

Sri Jayakumar S. Patil, Sr. Counsel for Sri S Vishwajith Shetty (for petitioners); Sri D. Aswathappa, AGA for R1 & R2; Sri M. Viswajith Rai, Adv. for R4

Sri Ramesh C Shetty and Sri Karunakara Shetty

State of Karnataka, The Registrar of Societies/Deputy Registrar of Co-op Societies, P R Pallangappa, and Bantara Yane Nadavara Mathru Sangha (R)

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India challenging the registration of amendments to bye-laws of a society under Section 10 of the Karnataka Societies Registration Act, 1960.

Remedy Sought

Petitioners sought to quash the endorsement dated 16.09.2011 registering the bye-law amendments, quash the resolution dated 07.08.2011, and issue a writ of mandamus to appoint an administrator to the society.

Filing Reason

Petitioners, as members of the society, were aggrieved by the registration of amendments to the bye-laws passed in a Special General Body Meeting on 07.08.2011.

Issues

Whether individual members of a society have locus standi to challenge the registration of bye-law amendments under Section 10 of the Karnataka Societies Registration Act, 1960.

Submissions/Arguments

Petitioners argued that the registration of amendments was illegal and without jurisdiction. Respondents contended that the writ petition was not maintainable as the petitioners had no locus standi and alternative remedies were available.

Ratio Decidendi

Individual members of a society registered under the Karnataka Societies Registration Act, 1960 have no locus standi to challenge the registration of amendments to bye-laws under Section 10 of the Act, as the Registrar acts in an administrative capacity without any requirement of notice or hearing to members. The proper remedy for members aggrieved by such amendments is to approach the Registrar under Section 25 of the Act or file a civil suit.

Judgment Excerpts

Petitioners are members of the 4th respondent society. They have filed these writ petitions challenging the endorsement Annexure-A dated 16.09.2011 issued by the Deputy Registrar of Co-operative Societies, Dakshina Kannada District, Mangalore, certifying the amendment to the Rules and Regulations proposed by the 4th respondent – Society to its bye-laws and registering the same under Section 10 of the Karnataka Societies Registration Act, 1960. The Registrar while registering the amendment under Section 10 of the Act is not required to issue any notice to the members of the society nor is he required to hold any enquiry. The registration of the amendment is a ministerial act of certifying that the amendment has been duly passed by the society. If the petitioners are aggrieved by the amendment to the bye-laws, they have to work out their remedies either by way of a civil suit or by approaching the Registrar under Section 25 of the Act.

Procedural History

The petitioners filed writ petitions under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India challenging the endorsement dated 16.09.2011 registering bye-law amendments and the resolution dated 07.08.2011. The court heard the matter and dismissed the petitions on 04.09.2014.

Acts & Sections

  • Karnataka Societies Registration Act, 1960: 10, 25
  • Constitution of India: 226, 227
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Karnataka High Court Dismisses Members' Challenge to Registration of Bye-law Amendments Under Section 10 of Karnataka Societies Registration Act, 1960 — Lack of Locus Standi. Individual members cannot challenge registration of amendments as Act pro...
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court at Goa Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Temple Construction for Lack of Locus Standi. Petitioner failed to establish any legal right or interest in the property to challenge construction on community land.