High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Partition Appeal in Land Dispute Case — Appellants' Claim Based on Prior Decree Set Aside in Related Second Appeal. The court held that since the judgment and decree on which the appellants' claim was founded had been set aside in a related second appeal, the appeal must be dismissed.

High Court: Karnataka High Court Bench: DHARWAD
  • 1
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The case involves a Regular First Appeal filed under Section 96 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 against the judgment and decree dated 17.04.2007 passed in O.S.No.257/2004 by the Principal Civil Judge (Senior Division), Gulbarga, which decreed the suit for partition, separate possession and injunction. The appellants are defendants in the suit. The appeal was heard along with Regular Second Appeal No.7126/2008, which was decided in favour of the appellant therein by a judgment delivered on the same day. The present appeal arises from a suit for partition filed by the plaintiff (respondent No.1 herein) claiming a share in the suit property. The appellants' claim in the appeal was based on a judgment and decree that was the subject matter of RSA No.7126/2008. Since that decree has been set aside in the second appeal, the foundation of the appellants' claim is destroyed. The court noted that the decision in RSA No.7126/2008 has a direct bearing on the present appeal. Consequently, the court held that the appeal is liable to be dismissed. The judgment includes a genealogy of the plaintiffs to depict the background. The court dismissed the appeal with no order as to costs.

Headnote

A) Civil Procedure - Res Judicata - Effect of Reversal of Decree - Where the appellants' claim for partition was founded on a judgment and decree that was the subject matter of a related second appeal, and that decree has been set aside, the foundation of the appellants' claim is destroyed and the appeal must be dismissed. (Paras 1-4)

B) Partition - Suit for Partition - Dismissal - When the basis of a claim for partition is a decree that has been reversed in appeal, the claim cannot survive and the suit is liable to be dismissed. (Paras 1-4)

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the appellants are entitled to partition of the suit property based on a prior judgment and decree that has been set aside in a related second appeal.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The appeal is dismissed. No order as to costs.

Law Points

  • Partition
  • Res Judicata
  • Civil Procedure
  • Land Reforms
  • Adoption
  • Hindu Succession
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2014 LawText (KAR) (06) 28

Regular First Appeal No.1317/2007

2014-06-16

Anand Byrareddy

Shri Ameet Kumar Deshpande for appellants; Sri.Ashok S. Kinagi for respondent No.1

Mudagalrao S/o. Vishwanthrao Kulkarni and others

Kalavathibai alias Vijayabai W/o. Sreedhar Alias Srinivasrao Kulkarni and others

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Regular First Appeal against judgment and decree in a suit for partition, separate possession and injunction.

Remedy Sought

Appellants sought to challenge the decree of partition passed by the trial court.

Filing Reason

The appellants claimed that the trial court's decree was erroneous and that they were entitled to a share based on a prior judgment and decree.

Previous Decisions

The trial court decreed the suit for partition in O.S.No.257/2004 on 17.04.2007. A related Regular Second Appeal No.7126/2008 was decided in favour of the appellant therein on the same day as this judgment.

Issues

Whether the appellants' claim for partition is sustainable when the judgment and decree on which it is based has been set aside in a related second appeal.

Ratio Decidendi

When a claim for partition is founded on a judgment and decree that has been set aside in a related appeal, the foundation of the claim is destroyed and the appeal must be dismissed.

Judgment Excerpts

It is pertinent to mention that this appeal was heard along with Regular Second Appeal in RSA No.7126/2008. The said appeal has been decided in favour of the appellant therein by a judgment delivered this day and the said decision has a direct bearing on the present appeal, as the basis of the appellants’ claim rests on the judgment and decree which were the subject matter of the said RSA No.7126/2008.

Procedural History

The suit O.S.No.257/2004 was decreed by the Principal Civil Judge (Senior Division), Gulbarga on 17.04.2007. The defendants filed Regular First Appeal No.1317/2007. A related Regular Second Appeal No.7126/2008 was also filed and decided on the same day.

Acts & Sections

  • Code of Civil Procedure, 1908: Section 96
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Partition Appeal in Land Dispute Case — Appellants' Claim Based on Prior Decree Set Aside in Related Second Appeal. The court held that since the judgment and decree on which the appellants' claim was founded had b...
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Acquits Appellant in Dowry Death Case Due to Insufficient Evidence of Cruelty Soon Before Death. Dying Declaration Lacked Specifics of Dowry Harassment, Leading to Acquittal Under Sections 498-A and 304-B IPC.