High Court of Karnataka Allows Writ Petition in Probate Court Fee Dispute — Court Fee Payable Only When Claim Becomes Contentious. The proviso to Article 11(l) of Schedule II of the Karnataka Court-Fees and Suits Valuation Act, 1958 requires court fee to be paid only after a caveat is entered or objections are filed, not at the time of filing the application for probate or letters of administration.

High Court: Karnataka High Court Bench: BENGALURU In Favour of Accused
  • 110
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The petitioner, Smt. N. Gajalakshmi, filed a writ petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India challenging an interlocutory order dated 11.10.2013 passed by the XXII Addl. City Civil Judge, Bangalore in P & SC Petition No.143/2009. The trial court had directed the petitioner to pay court fee on the petition as per the proviso to Article 11(l) of Schedule II of the Karnataka Court-Fees and Suits Valuation Act, 1958. The petitioner contended that the court fee becomes payable only when the claim becomes contentious, i.e., after a caveat is entered or objections are filed. The respondents, who were the defendants in the probate proceedings, argued that the court fee was payable at the time of filing. The High Court, after hearing both sides, held that the court fee under the proviso becomes payable only when the claim becomes contentious. Since no caveat had been entered or objections filed at the time of the impugned order, the court fee was not yet payable. The court set aside the trial court's order and directed that the court fee be paid only if and when the claim becomes contentious. The writ petition was allowed.

Headnote

A) Court Fees - Probate and Letters of Administration - Time of Payment of Court Fee - Karnataka Court-Fees and Suits Valuation Act, 1958, Schedule II, Article 11(l) proviso - The court fee under the proviso becomes payable only when the claim becomes contentious, i.e., when a caveat is entered or objections are filed, not at the time of filing the application. The trial court's order directing payment of court fee at the initial stage was set aside. (Paras 1-6)

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

When does court fee become payable as per the proviso to Article 11(l) of Schedule II of the Karnataka Court-Fees and Suits Valuation Act, 1958 on an application for grant of probate or letters of administration?

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The writ petition is allowed. The impugned order dated 11.10.2013 passed by the XXII Addl. City Civil Judge, Bangalore in P & SC Petition No.143/2009 is set aside. The trial court is directed to call upon the petitioner to pay court fee under the proviso to Article 11(l) of Schedule II of the Karnataka Court-Fees and Suits Valuation Act, 1958 only if and when the claim becomes contentious.

Law Points

  • Court fee becomes payable under proviso to Article 11(l) of Schedule II of Karnataka Court-Fees and Suits Valuation Act
  • 1958 when the claim becomes contentious
  • not at the time of filing the application for probate or letters of administration
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2014 LawText (KAR) (06) 13

Writ Petition No.48803/2013 (GM-CPC)

2014-06-04

H.G. Ramesh

Sri S.V. Bhat for petitioner; Sri Mithun for Sri G.D. Ashwathnarayan for R2; Sri C.G. Gopalaswamy for R1

Smt. N. Gajalakshmi

N. Nagaraja Reddy and Smt. Jayalakshmi

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Writ petition under Article 227 of Constitution of India challenging an interlocutory order in a probate proceeding regarding payment of court fee.

Remedy Sought

Petitioner sought to quash the order dated 11.10.2013 passed by the trial court directing payment of court fee on the P & SC petition as per the proviso to Article 11(l) of Schedule II of the Karnataka Court-Fees Act.

Filing Reason

The trial court directed the petitioner to pay court fee on the probate petition at the initial stage, whereas the petitioner contended that court fee becomes payable only when the claim becomes contentious.

Previous Decisions

The trial court passed the impugned order on 11.10.2013 in P & SC Petition No.143/2009.

Issues

Whether court fee under the proviso to Article 11(l) of Schedule II of the Karnataka Court-Fees and Suits Valuation Act, 1958 becomes payable at the time of filing the application for probate or letters of administration, or only when the claim becomes contentious.

Submissions/Arguments

Petitioner argued that court fee under the proviso becomes payable only when the claim becomes contentious, i.e., after a caveat is entered or objections are filed. Respondents argued that court fee is payable at the time of filing the application.

Ratio Decidendi

The court fee under the proviso to Article 11(l) of Schedule II of the Karnataka Court-Fees and Suits Valuation Act, 1958 becomes payable only when the claim becomes contentious, i.e., when a caveat is entered or objections are filed, and not at the time of filing the application for probate or letters of administration.

Judgment Excerpts

When court fee becomes payable as per the proviso to Article 11 (l) of Schedule II of the Karnataka Court-Fees and Suits Valuation Act, 1958 on an application for grant of probate or letters of administration? In my opinion, the court fee becomes payable under the proviso, when the claim becomes contentious. The reasoning of the trial Court in the impugned order reads as follows: '8. A perusal of records will reflect that petitioner is claiming grant of probate...' In my opinion, the court fee becomes payable under the proviso, when the claim becomes contentious.

Procedural History

The petitioner filed P & SC Petition No.143/2009 before the XXII Addl. City Civil Judge, Bangalore for grant of probate or letters of administration. The second respondent filed a memo, and the trial court passed an order on 11.10.2013 directing the petitioner to pay court fee as per the proviso to Article 11(l) of Schedule II of the Karnataka Court-Fees Act. The petitioner challenged this order by filing the present writ petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India.

Acts & Sections

  • Karnataka Court-Fees and Suits Valuation Act, 1958: Schedule II, Article 11(l) proviso
  • Constitution of India: Article 227
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Karnataka High Court Allows Revision Petition, Quashes Summons Against Accused in Dowry Harassment Case Due to Lack of Specific Allegations. The court held that summoning accused without specific allegations in complaint or charge sheet is an abuse o...
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Senior Citizens Tribunal Order in Property Dispute Between Mother and Son. Maintenance and Property Rights Under Maintenance and Welfare of Parents and Senior Citizens Act, 2007 Upheld.