High Court of Karnataka Quashes Withdrawal of Registrar Appointment in University Service Matter — Violation of Natural Justice. Appointment under Section 17 of Karnataka State Universities Act, 2000 cannot be withdrawn without affording opportunity of hearing.

High Court: Karnataka High Court Bench: BENGALURU In Favour of Accused
  • 5
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The petitioner, Dr. C. Basavaraju, was appointed as Professor of Law by the University of Mysore on 12.07.2007 and was granted annual increments. In exercise of power under Section 17 of the Karnataka State Universities Act, 2000, he was appointed as Registrar of the University of Mysore on 24.06.2013 vide order Annexure-E. The petitioner had earlier filed W.P.No.8063/2014 seeking a declaration that he is deemed to have been confirmed as Professor with effect from 11.07.2009, which was allowed in part and the respondents were directed to consider his representation dated 25.01.2014. By an order dated 29.03.2014 (Annexure-A), the earlier appointment order (Annexure-E) was withdrawn, and the petitioner was restored to the post of Professor of Law. The petitioner challenged the legality of the order dated 29.03.2014 by filing this writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India. The court found that the impugned order was passed without affording any opportunity of hearing to the petitioner, thereby violating principles of natural justice. Consequently, the court quashed the order dated 29.03.2014 and directed the respondents to consider the petitioner's case afresh after giving him a reasonable opportunity of being heard. The writ petition was allowed in part.

Headnote

A) Service Law - Appointment - Withdrawal - Natural Justice - Section 17, Karnataka State Universities Act, 2000 - The petitioner was appointed as Registrar under Section 17 of the Act. The impugned order withdrew the appointment without giving any opportunity of hearing to the petitioner. Held that the order is violative of principles of natural justice and is liable to be quashed. (Paras 1-3)

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the order dated 29.03.2014 withdrawing the appointment of the petitioner as Registrar of University of Mysore, made under Section 17 of the Karnataka State Universities Act, 2000, is legal and valid.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The writ petition is allowed in part. The impugned order dated 29.03.2014 (Annexure-A) is quashed. The respondents are directed to consider the petitioner's case afresh after affording him a reasonable opportunity of being heard.

Law Points

  • Natural justice
  • opportunity of hearing
  • withdrawal of appointment
  • Section 17 Karnataka State Universities Act
  • 2000
  • Articles 226 and 227 Constitution of India
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2014 LawText (KAR) (06) 4

Writ Petition No.16701/2014 (S-RES)

2014-06-02

A.N. Venugopala Gowda

M.S. Bhagwat for petitioner; H. Kantharaja, Addl. Adv. General and Smt. M.S. Prathima, HCGP for R1; T.P. Rajendra Kumar Sungay for R2; M/s. Subba Rao & Co. for impleading applicant

Dr. C. Basavaraju

State of Karnataka, University of Mysore

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Writ petition challenging the withdrawal of appointment as Registrar of University of Mysore.

Remedy Sought

Quashing of order dated 29.03.2014 withdrawing appointment and grant of consequential benefits.

Filing Reason

The petitioner's appointment as Registrar was withdrawn without affording him an opportunity of hearing.

Previous Decisions

W.P.No.8063/2014 was allowed in part, quashing a communication and directing consideration of representation dated 25.01.2014.

Issues

Whether the impugned order withdrawing the appointment of the petitioner as Registrar is legal and valid. Whether the order was passed in violation of principles of natural justice.

Submissions/Arguments

The petitioner argued that the impugned order was passed without giving him an opportunity of hearing, violating natural justice. The respondents contended that the order was validly passed under the Act.

Ratio Decidendi

An order withdrawing an appointment made under Section 17 of the Karnataka State Universities Act, 2000, without affording the appointee an opportunity of hearing, is violative of principles of natural justice and is liable to be quashed.

Judgment Excerpts

The petitioner was appointed on 12.07.2007 as Professor of Law by the University of Mysore. By an order dated 29.03.2014, as at Annexure-A, the order as at Annexure-E was withdrawn. The impugned order is quashed. The respondents are directed to consider the petitioner's case afresh after affording him a reasonable opportunity of being heard.

Procedural History

The petitioner filed W.P.No.8063/2014 which was allowed in part, directing consideration of representation. Thereafter, the impugned order dated 29.03.2014 was passed withdrawing the appointment. The petitioner then filed the present writ petition challenging that order.

Acts & Sections

  • Karnataka State Universities Act, 2000: Section 17
  • Constitution of India: Articles 226, 227
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court High Court of Karnataka Quashes Withdrawal of Registrar Appointment in University Service Matter — Violation of Natural Justice. Appointment under Section 17 of Karnataka State Universities Act, 2000 cannot be withdrawn without affording opportunit...
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Amendment of Plaint in Possession Suit — Alternate Plea of Revocable License Allowed Under Order VI Rule 17 CPC. Amendment Permitted Despite Proviso as Trial Had Not Commenced and No Prejudice Caused...