High Court Dismisses Employee's Writ Petition Seeking Deemed Service After Resignation Withdrawal — Resignation Once Accepted Cannot Be Unilaterally Withdrawn Without Employer's Consent. The court held that the employer's non-response to the withdrawal does not imply acceptance, and the resignation stands effective.

High Court: Karnataka High Court Bench: BENGALURU In Favour of Prosecution
  • 1
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The petitioner, Sri P.R. Bhaskar, was employed as a Manager at Nethradhama Super Specialty Eye Hospital Pvt. Ltd. He tendered his resignation on 18.12.2013 via intra-mail. The next day, on 19.12.2013, he sent an email withdrawing his resignation, followed by a formal letter of withdrawal dated 23.12.2013. Receiving no response from the respondents, he filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India seeking a declaration that he is deemed to be in service throughout and consequently entitled to arrears of salary and other benefits. The court considered the legal position regarding withdrawal of resignation. The petitioner's counsel argued that the resignation had not been accepted before the withdrawal was communicated. However, the court noted that the resignation was submitted on 18.12.2013 and the withdrawal was sent on 19.12.2013, but the employer did not respond. The court held that once a resignation is tendered and accepted by the employer, it cannot be unilaterally withdrawn by the employee without the employer's consent. Since the employer did not accept the withdrawal, the resignation stood accepted. The court dismissed the writ petition, finding no merit in the petitioner's claim for deemed service and arrears of salary.

Headnote

A) Service Law - Resignation - Withdrawal of Resignation - Once resignation is tendered and accepted by the employer, it cannot be unilaterally withdrawn by the employee without the employer's consent - The petitioner, a Manager, tendered resignation on 18.12.2013 and sent withdrawal on 19.12.2013, but the employer did not respond - Held that the resignation stood accepted and the petitioner cannot claim deemed service (Paras 1-3).

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether an employee can unilaterally withdraw a resignation after it has been accepted by the employer, and whether the employee is entitled to a declaration of deemed continuance in service.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The writ petition is dismissed. No order as to costs.

Law Points

  • Resignation
  • Withdrawal of resignation
  • Employer's acceptance
  • Unilateral withdrawal
  • Contract of service
  • Articles 226 and 227 of Constitution of India
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2014 LawText (KAR) (04) 9

Writ Petition No.16316/2014 (S-RES)

2014-04-05

A.N. Venugopala Gowda

Sri Lakshman Rao

Sri P.R. Bhaskar

The Chairman & Managing Director, Nethradhama Super Specialty Eye Hospital Pvt. Ltd. and The Manager, Human Resources Department

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India seeking declaration of deemed service and consequential benefits.

Remedy Sought

Petitioner sought declaration that he is deemed to be in service throughout and entitled to arrears of salary and other benefits.

Filing Reason

Petitioner's resignation was not accepted by the employer after he withdrew it, and he sought to be treated as continuing in service.

Issues

Whether the petitioner can unilaterally withdraw his resignation after it has been accepted by the employer. Whether the petitioner is entitled to a declaration of deemed continuance in service.

Submissions/Arguments

Petitioner's counsel argued that the resignation was withdrawn before acceptance, and thus the petitioner should be deemed to be in service.

Ratio Decidendi

A resignation once tendered and accepted by the employer cannot be unilaterally withdrawn by the employee without the employer's consent. The employer's silence does not amount to acceptance of the withdrawal.

Judgment Excerpts

Petitioner was a Manager of Nethradhama Super Speciality Eye Hospital Pvt. Ltd. He tendered resignation to the post on 18.12.2013. Having sent a E-mail on 19.12.2013 to the respondents about withdrawal of the resignation and followed by a letter of withdrawal dated 23.12.2013 and finding no response filed this writ petition.

Procedural History

The petitioner filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India on the ground that his resignation was withdrawn before acceptance, and the employer did not respond. The petition came up for preliminary hearing and was dismissed.

Acts & Sections

  • Constitution of India: Articles 226, 227
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Allows State Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Case — Enhances Compensation for Acquired Land Based on Comparable Sale Deeds and Potential Value. Court Held That Market Value Must Be Determined Considering Potential for Dev...
Related Judgement
High Court High Court Dismisses Employee's Writ Petition Seeking Deemed Service After Resignation Withdrawal — Resignation Once Accepted Cannot Be Unilaterally Withdrawn Without Employer's Consent. The court held that the employer's non-response to the withdr...