High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Petitions Challenging Property Tax Reassessment by BBMP — Petitioners Failed to Exhaust Statutory Remedy of Appeal Under Section 149 of Karnataka Municipal Corporations Act, 1976. The court held that the existence of an alternative remedy of appeal bars the maintainability of a writ petition under Article 226, and no exceptional circumstances were shown to bypass the same.

High Court: Karnataka High Court Bench: BENGALURU In Favour of Prosecution
  • 1
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The petitioners, residents of Bysani Skyway Apartment in Bangalore, filed 28 writ petitions under Article 226 of the Constitution challenging the reassessment of property tax by the Bruhath Bangalore Mahanagara Palike (BBMP). The BBMP had issued notices under Section 147 of the Karnataka Municipal Corporations Act, 1976, proposing to revise the property tax based on the capital value of the properties. The petitioners contended that the reassessment was arbitrary and without jurisdiction. However, the court noted that the Act provides a statutory remedy of appeal under Section 149 against such assessments. The petitioners had not availed this remedy. The court held that the existence of an alternative remedy is a bar to the maintainability of a writ petition, unless the petitioner demonstrates exceptional circumstances such as lack of jurisdiction or violation of fundamental rights. No such circumstances were shown. Consequently, the court dismissed the writ petitions, granting the petitioners liberty to file appeals under Section 149 within four weeks, and directed that if such appeals are filed, the appellate authority shall consider them without raising the issue of limitation.

Headnote

A) Constitutional Law - Writ Jurisdiction - Alternative Remedy - Maintainability - Petitioners challenged property tax reassessment notices issued by BBMP under Section 147 of the Karnataka Municipal Corporations Act, 1976 - Court held that the petitioners have an efficacious alternative remedy of appeal under Section 149 of the Act - Writ petition dismissed as not maintainable without exhausting statutory remedy - Held that the High Court should not entertain a writ petition when an alternative remedy is available, unless exceptional circumstances exist (Paras 1-5).

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution is maintainable when the petitioners have an alternative statutory remedy of appeal under Section 149 of the Karnataka Municipal Corporations Act, 1976, against the reassessment of property tax.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The writ petitions are dismissed as not maintainable. Petitioners are granted liberty to file appeals under Section 149 of the Karnataka Municipal Corporations Act, 1976 within four weeks from the date of receipt of the order. If such appeals are filed, the appellate authority shall consider them without raising the issue of limitation.

Law Points

  • Exhaustion of statutory remedy
  • maintainability of writ petition
  • alternative remedy
  • property tax reassessment
  • Karnataka Municipal Corporations Act
  • 1976 Section 149
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2014 LawText (KAR) (03) 42

Writ Petition Nos.9956-9983/2014 (LB-BMP)

2014-03-01

A.N. Venugopala Gowda

H. Subramanya Jois, Senior Counsel for K.C. Shantakumar

G. Chandrakant and others

The Bruhath Bangalore Mahanagara Palike and another

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Writ petitions challenging property tax reassessment notices issued by BBMP.

Remedy Sought

Petitioners sought quashing of reassessment notices and direction to BBMP to not collect tax based on capital value.

Filing Reason

Petitioners alleged that the reassessment of property tax under Section 147 of the Karnataka Municipal Corporations Act, 1976 was arbitrary and without jurisdiction.

Issues

Whether the writ petitions are maintainable in view of the alternative statutory remedy of appeal under Section 149 of the Karnataka Municipal Corporations Act, 1976.

Submissions/Arguments

Petitioners argued that the reassessment notices were illegal and without jurisdiction. Respondent BBMP contended that the petitioners have an alternative remedy of appeal under Section 149 of the Act and the writ petitions are not maintainable.

Ratio Decidendi

The existence of an efficacious alternative statutory remedy of appeal under Section 149 of the Karnataka Municipal Corporations Act, 1976 bars the maintainability of a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution, unless exceptional circumstances such as lack of jurisdiction or violation of fundamental rights are demonstrated. No such circumstances were shown in this case.

Judgment Excerpts

The petitioners have an alternative and efficacious remedy of appeal under Section 149 of the Karnataka Municipal Corporations Act, 1976. Without exhausting the statutory remedy, the writ petitions are not maintainable. Liberty is reserved to the petitioners to file appeals under Section 149 of the Act within four weeks.

Procedural History

The petitioners filed 28 writ petitions under Article 226 of the Constitution before the High Court of Karnataka challenging property tax reassessment notices issued by BBMP. The court heard the matter on the question of maintainability and dismissed the petitions on 1st March 2014.

Acts & Sections

  • Karnataka Municipal Corporations Act, 1976: Section 147, Section 149
  • Constitution of India: Article 226
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Allows Transfer of Divorce Petition from Nanded to Pune on Wife's Convenience. Wife's convenience and hardship of travel with a two-year-old child considered paramount under Section 24 CPC.
Related Judgement
High Court High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Petitions Challenging Property Tax Reassessment by BBMP — Petitioners Failed to Exhaust Statutory Remedy of Appeal Under Section 149 of Karnataka Municipal Corporations Act, 1976. The court held that the existence ...