High Court of Karnataka Quashes Lok Adalat Award in Partition Suit for Lack of Jurisdiction and Non-Compliance with Legal Formalities. Lok Adalat Award Passed Without Proper Notice and Without Recording Compromise Terms is Null and Void.

High Court: Karnataka High Court Bench: DHARWAD In Favour of Accused
  • 1
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The petitioners, who were defendants in a partition suit, challenged the award passed by the Lok Adalat on 14/08/2009 and the consequential final decree dated 03/10/2009. The plaintiff, Kenchavva, wife of defendant No.5, had filed the suit for partition. The Lok Adalat passed an award without issuing notice to the defendants and without recording the terms of compromise. The petitioners contended that the award was a nullity as it was passed without jurisdiction and in violation of the principles of natural justice. The court examined the provisions of the Legal Services Authorities Act, 1987, particularly Sections 20 and 21, which require that the Lok Adalat must issue notice to all parties and record the terms of settlement. The court found that the award was passed in gross violation of these statutory requirements. Consequently, the court allowed the writ petition, set aside the Lok Adalat award and the consequential decree, and restored the suit to the file of the trial court for disposal in accordance with law.

Headnote

A) Civil Procedure - Lok Adalat Award - Nullity - Lack of Jurisdiction - Award passed by Lok Adalat without issuing notice to the defendants and without recording the terms of compromise is without jurisdiction and a nullity - Held that the award is liable to be set aside as it violates principles of natural justice and the provisions of the Legal Services Authorities Act, 1987 (Paras 2-4).

B) Legal Services Authorities Act, 1987 - Sections 20 and 21 - Lok Adalat - Procedure - Notice and Recording of Compromise - The Lok Adalat must issue notice to all parties and record the terms of settlement before passing an award - Failure to do so renders the award void - Held that the award in question was passed in gross violation of the statutory requirements (Paras 2-4).

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the award passed by the Lok Adalat in a partition suit without issuing notice to the defendants and without recording the compromise terms is valid and binding.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The writ petition is allowed. The award dated 14/08/2009 passed by the Lok Adalat and the consequential final decree dated 03/10/2009 are set aside. The suit is restored to the file of the trial court for disposal in accordance with law.

Law Points

  • Lok Adalat jurisdiction
  • Award nullity
  • Notice requirement
  • Compromise recording
  • Section 20 Legal Services Authorities Act
  • Section 21 Legal Services Authorities Act
  • Article 226 Constitution of India
  • Article 227 Constitution of India
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2014 LawText (KAR) (01) 37

Writ Petition No.65543 of 2011 (GM-CPC)

2014-01-31

N. Kumar

Sri. Dinesh M Kulkarni for petitioners; Sri. Hanamant R Latur for respondents 1-5 & 8-9; Sri. Narayan V. Yaji for respondent 6; respondent 7 served

Mahadevi W/o Dundappa Sanpaganvi (deleted) and Master Madan S/o Dundappa Sanpaganvi (minor represented by natural mother Mallawwa W/o Dundappa Shivapure)

Kenchavva W/o Lakkappa Sanpaganvi and others

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Writ petition challenging the award passed by the Lok Adalat in a partition suit.

Remedy Sought

Setting aside the Lok Adalat award dated 14/08/2009 and the consequential final decree dated 03/10/2009 as null and void.

Filing Reason

The Lok Adalat passed the award without issuing notice to the defendants and without recording the terms of compromise.

Previous Decisions

The Lok Adalat passed an award on 14/08/2009 and a final decree on 03/10/2009.

Issues

Whether the Lok Adalat award passed without notice to the defendants and without recording compromise terms is valid? Whether the award is a nullity for lack of jurisdiction?

Submissions/Arguments

The petitioners argued that the Lok Adalat award was passed without jurisdiction and in violation of principles of natural justice as no notice was issued to them and no compromise terms were recorded. The respondents did not appear or contest the petition.

Ratio Decidendi

A Lok Adalat award passed without issuing notice to the parties and without recording the terms of compromise is without jurisdiction and a nullity, as it violates the mandatory provisions of Sections 20 and 21 of the Legal Services Authorities Act, 1987.

Judgment Excerpts

The plaintiff—Kenchavva, who is the wife of defendant No.5, filed a suit for partition. The award passed by the Lok Adalat without notice to the defendants and without recording the terms of compromise is a nullity. Hence, the award passed by the Lok Adalat is liable to be set aside.

Procedural History

The plaintiff filed a partition suit. The Lok Adalat passed an award on 14/08/2009 and a final decree on 03/10/2009. The petitioners filed this writ petition on 30/03/2012 (appellant No.1 deleted) challenging the award and decree.

Acts & Sections

  • Legal Services Authorities Act, 1987: 20, 21
  • Constitution of India: 226, 227
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Appeal by Union of India in Army Dismissal Case Due to Procedural Irregularity. Summary Court Martial Conducted Without Following Mandatory Procedure Under Army Rules 22-24 and Section 80 of Army Act, 1950 Renders Di...
Related Judgement
High Court High Court of Karnataka Quashes Lok Adalat Award in Partition Suit for Lack of Jurisdiction and Non-Compliance with Legal Formalities. Lok Adalat Award Passed Without Proper Notice and Without Recording Compromise Terms is Null and Void.