High Court of Karnataka Quashes Criminal Proceedings Against Company and Chairman in TDS Default Case — Failure to Remit TDS Not an Offence Under Section 276-B of Income Tax Act if Tax is Subsequently Paid with Interest. The court held that the prosecution under Section 276-B read with Section 278-B of the Income Tax Act, 1961 is not maintainable when the deducted tax has been paid along with interest before the initiation of proceedings.

High Court: Karnataka High Court Bench: BENGALURU In Favour of Accused
  • 9
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The petitioners, M/s Kingfisher Airlines Ltd. and its Chairman and Managing Director, Sri Vijay Mallya, filed three criminal petitions under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, seeking quashing of proceedings in C.C. No. 49/2013, 77/2013, and 78/2013 pending before the Special Court for Economic Offences, Bangalore. The respondent, the Income Tax Department, had initiated these proceedings for offences punishable under Section 276-B read with Section 278-B of the Income Tax Act, 1961, alleging that the petitioners had deducted tax at source (TDS) for the financial years 2009-10, 2010-11, and 2011-12 but failed to remit the same to the government account, amounting to Rs. 400,56,08,659/-. The department conducted a survey under Section 133-A of the Act on 18.03.2011 and discovered the default. The petitioners contended that the entire TDS amount along with interest had been paid before the complaints were filed, and therefore, the offence under Section 276-B was not attracted. The court examined the provisions of Section 276-B, which penalizes failure to pay tax deducted at source to the government credit. It observed that the section requires that the tax deducted must not have been paid; if the tax is paid along with interest before the initiation of prosecution, the offence is not made out. The court also noted that for vicarious liability under Section 278-B, there must be specific allegations of consent, connivance, or negligence against the director. Since the tax was paid with interest prior to the filing of complaints, the court held that the proceedings were an abuse of process and quashed them.

Headnote

A) Criminal Law - Income Tax - TDS Default - Section 276-B read with Section 278-B of Income Tax Act, 1961 - Quashing of Proceedings - The petitioners, a company and its Chairman, were prosecuted for failure to remit TDS for financial years 2009-10, 2010-11, and 2011-12. The court held that since the deducted tax was paid along with interest before the complaints were filed, the essential ingredients of the offence under Section 276-B were not attracted. The proceedings were quashed under Section 482 Cr.PC. (Paras 2-10)

B) Criminal Law - Income Tax - Vicarious Liability - Section 278-B of Income Tax Act, 1961 - The court noted that for vicarious liability to attach to the Chairman and Managing Director under Section 278-B, there must be a finding that the offence was committed with the consent or connivance of, or was attributable to the negligence of such person. In the absence of any such allegation, the prosecution against the second petitioner was also liable to be quashed. (Paras 8-10)

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether criminal proceedings under Section 276-B read with Section 278-B of the Income Tax Act, 1961 can be sustained against the petitioners for failure to remit TDS when the tax deducted at source was subsequently paid along with interest before the initiation of prosecution.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The court allowed the petitions and quashed the proceedings in C.C. No. 49/2013, 77/2013, and 78/2013 pending before the Special Court for Economic Offences, Bangalore.

Law Points

  • Section 276-B of Income Tax Act
  • 1961
  • Section 278-B of Income Tax Act
  • Section 133-A of Income Tax Act
  • Section 482 of Code of Criminal Procedure
  • 1973
  • TDS default
  • quashing of criminal proceedings
  • mens rea
  • vicarious liability
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2014 LawText (KAR) (01) 5

Crl.P.No.4964/2013 c/w Crl.P.No.4965/2013 & Crl.P.No.4966/2013

2014-01-18

H.N. Nagamohan Das

Sri Harin Raval, Sri D.L.N. Rao, Smt S.R. Anuradha for petitioners; Sri Mohan Parasan (Solicitor General), Sri K.V. Aravind, Sri D.L. Chidananda for respondent

M/s Kingfisher Airlines Ltd. and Sri Vijay Mallya

The Income Tax Department

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Criminal petitions under Section 482 Cr.PC seeking quashing of proceedings for offences under Section 276-B read with Section 278-B of Income Tax Act.

Remedy Sought

Petitioners sought quashing of proceedings in C.C. No. 49/2013, 77/2013, and 78/2013 on the file of Special Court for Economic Offences, Bangalore.

Filing Reason

The Income Tax Department filed complaints alleging that the petitioners deducted tax at source but failed to remit it to the government account for financial years 2009-10, 2010-11, and 2011-12.

Issues

Whether the offence under Section 276-B of the Income Tax Act is attracted when the deducted tax is paid along with interest before the initiation of prosecution. Whether the Chairman and Managing Director can be vicariously liable under Section 278-B in the absence of specific allegations of consent, connivance, or negligence.

Submissions/Arguments

Petitioners argued that the entire TDS amount along with interest was paid before the complaints were filed, and therefore, the offence under Section 276-B is not made out. Respondent argued that the default in remitting TDS constitutes an offence under Section 276-B, and the subsequent payment does not absolve the petitioners of criminal liability.

Ratio Decidendi

The offence under Section 276-B of the Income Tax Act is not attracted if the tax deducted at source is paid along with interest before the initiation of prosecution. For vicarious liability under Section 278-B, specific allegations of consent, connivance, or negligence are required.

Judgment Excerpts

In these three petitions the petitioners have prayed for quashing the proceedings in C.C. No. 49/2013, 77/2013 and 78/2013 on the file of Special Court (Economic Offences), Bangalore City. The respondent filed three cases before the Economic Offences Court against the petitioners for the financial years 2009-10, 2010-11 and 2011-12 for the offences punishable under Section 276-B read with Section 278-B of Income Tax Act.

Procedural History

The Income Tax Department conducted a survey under Section 133-A on 18.03.2011 and discovered TDS default. Subsequently, three complaints were filed before the Special Court for Economic Offences, Bangalore, which were numbered as C.C. No. 49/2013, 77/2013, and 78/2013. The petitioners filed these criminal petitions under Section 482 Cr.PC seeking quashing of the proceedings.

Acts & Sections

  • Income Tax Act, 1961: 276-B, 278-B, 133-A
  • Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973: 482
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court High Court of Karnataka Quashes Criminal Proceedings Against Company and Chairman in TDS Default Case — Failure to Remit TDS Not an Offence Under Section 276-B of Income Tax Act if Tax is Subsequently Paid with Interest. The court held that the pro...
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Allows Stay on Interest Demand in MVAT Case — Tribunal Erred in Treating Composite Order as Non-Appealable Under Section 30(2). The court held that an appellate order confirming interest under Section 30(2) of the Maharashtra Valu...