Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Seeking DACP Benefits for NPCIL Employees — Pay Commission Recommendations Not Binding on Public Sector Undertakings. The court held that NPCIL, as a PSU, is not obligated to implement the Dynamic Assured Career Progression Scheme recommended by Central Pay Commissions.

High Court: Bombay High Court Bench: BOMBAY
  • 1
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The petitioners, employees of the Nuclear Power Corporation of India Limited (NPCIL), filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking a mandamus to direct NPCIL to implement the recommendations of the 5th, 6th, and 7th Central Pay Commissions regarding the Dynamic Assured Career Progression (DACP) Scheme. They claimed entitlement to DACP benefits from their dates of eligibility and consequential arrears with interest. The court, after hearing the parties, dismissed the petition, holding that NPCIL, being a Public Sector Undertaking, is not bound by the Pay Commission recommendations. The DACP Scheme is not applicable to NPCIL employees, and no legal right exists to compel its implementation. The court found no merit in the petition and discharged the rule.

Headnote

A) Service Law - Dynamic Assured Career Progression (DACP) Scheme - Pay Commission Recommendations - The petitioners, employees of NPCIL, sought implementation of DACP benefits as per Central Pay Commission reports. The court held that NPCIL, being a Public Sector Undertaking, is not bound by the recommendations of the Pay Commissions, and the DACP Scheme is not applicable to its employees. The petition was dismissed. (Paras 1-5)

B) Constitutional Law - Writ of Mandamus - Article 226 of the Constitution of India - The court held that a writ of mandamus cannot be issued to direct a public sector undertaking to implement Pay Commission recommendations unless there is a legal right and corresponding duty. Since NPCIL is not a government department, the recommendations are not binding. (Paras 2-5)

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the petitioners, employees of Nuclear Power Corporation of India Limited (NPCIL), are entitled to the benefits of the Dynamic Assured Career Progression (DACP) Scheme as recommended by the 5th, 6th, and 7th Central Pay Commissions, and whether a writ of mandamus can be issued to compel NPCIL to implement those recommendations.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The petition is dismissed. Rule discharged. No order as to costs.

Law Points

  • Dynamic Assured Career Progression Scheme
  • Pay Commission Recommendations
  • Public Sector Undertakings
  • Writ of Mandamus
  • Article 226
  • Binding Nature of Pay Commission Reports
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2026 LawText (BOM) (07) 14

Writ Petition No. 12361 of 2025

2026-07-02

G. S. Kulkarni, Aarti Sathe

Mr. Jagdish Aradwad Reddy a/w Kishor Patil, Ashwini Jadhav for Petitioners; Mr. Dashrath Dube a/w Y. S. Bhate & Viraj Bhate for Respondent No.1 & 2; Ms. Nukshi Naro i/b. M. V. Kini & Co. for Respondent Nos. 3 and 4.

Swarup Bhattacharya & Ors.

Union of India & Ors.

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Writ petition under Article 226 seeking mandamus to implement Pay Commission recommendations.

Remedy Sought

Petitioners sought direction to NPCIL to implement DACP Scheme as per 5th, 6th, and 7th Central Pay Commission recommendations and grant consequential arrears with interest.

Filing Reason

Petitioners claimed entitlement to DACP benefits which were not granted by NPCIL.

Issues

Whether NPCIL is bound to implement Central Pay Commission recommendations regarding DACP Scheme. Whether a writ of mandamus can be issued to direct NPCIL to grant DACP benefits.

Submissions/Arguments

Petitioners argued that they are entitled to DACP benefits as per Pay Commission recommendations. Respondents contended that NPCIL is a PSU and not bound by Pay Commission recommendations.

Ratio Decidendi

Public Sector Undertakings are not bound by the recommendations of Central Pay Commissions, and the Dynamic Assured Career Progression Scheme is not applicable to their employees. A writ of mandamus cannot be issued to enforce such recommendations without a legal right and corresponding duty.

Judgment Excerpts

This petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India has been filled praying for the following substantive reliefs:- Rule. Rule made returnable forthwith. With the consent of the parties, heard finally. The petition is dismissed. Rule discharged.

Procedural History

The petition was filed in 2025, heard finally on 2 July 2026, and dismissed on the same day.

Acts & Sections

  • Constitution of India: Article 226
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Seeking DACP Benefits for NPCIL Employees — Pay Commission Recommendations Not Binding on Public Sector Undertakings. The court held that NPCIL, as a PSU, is not obligated to implement the Dynamic Assured Career...
Related Judgement
Supreme Court Supreme Court Dismisses Tenant's Appeal in SARFAESI Act Case, Upholding High Court Order Setting Aside District Magistrate's Decision. District Magistrate's Role Under Section 14 is Limited to Assisting Secured Creditor in Taking Possession, Not Adju...