High Court of Karnataka Allows Release of Passport to Accused in Criminal Case on Conditions — Passport Seized During Investigation Cannot Be Detained Indefinitely; Right to Travel and Livelihood Must Be Balanced Against Investigation Needs

High Court: Karnataka High Court Bench: KALABURAGI In Favour of Accused
  • 139
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The petitioner, accused No.2 in Crime No.214/2013 registered at Udupi Town Police Station for offences under Sections 406, 468, 471, 420 read with 34 IPC, had his passport seized by the police. He filed an application under Section 451 Cr.P.C. before the Additional Civil Judge and JMFC, Udupi, seeking release of the passport. The Magistrate rejected the application on 19.08.2014, holding that a prima facie case was made out and that if the passport was released, the accused would flee from the court's jurisdiction as he was working in a foreign country. The petitioner then filed a revision petition before the Principal Sessions Judge, Udupi, which was dismissed on 29.11.2014. Aggrieved, the petitioner approached the High Court under Section 482 Cr.P.C. The High Court observed that the passport is property and the court has discretion under Section 451 Cr.P.C. to release it pending trial. The court noted that the right to travel abroad is a fundamental right under Article 21 of the Constitution and that the passport cannot be detained indefinitely. The court held that the Magistrate's order was mechanical and did not consider the possibility of imposing conditions to secure the accused's presence. The High Court allowed the petition, set aside the orders of the lower courts, and directed the release of the passport to the petitioner subject to conditions: the petitioner shall furnish a personal bond of Rs.1,00,000 with one surety, report to the Investigating Officer on the first working day of every month until the trial concludes, and shall not leave the country without prior permission of the trial court. The court clarified that the trial court may impose additional conditions if necessary.

Headnote

A) Criminal Procedure - Release of Passport - Section 451 Cr.P.C. - Passport is property and can be released pending trial - The court held that the Magistrate erred in rejecting the application solely on the ground that the accused would flee, without considering the right to travel and livelihood - Held that passport can be released subject to conditions such as furnishing security and reporting to police (Paras 1-5).

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the passport of an accused seized during investigation can be released pending trial under Section 451 Cr.P.C., and what conditions may be imposed to balance the right to travel and the need to secure the accused's presence.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

Petition allowed. Orders dated 19.08.2014 and 29.11.2014 set aside. Passport to be released to petitioner subject to conditions: (i) furnish personal bond of Rs.1,00,000 with one surety; (ii) report to Investigating Officer on first working day of every month until trial concludes; (iii) shall not leave country without prior permission of trial court. Trial court may impose additional conditions.

Law Points

  • Section 451 Cr.P.C. empowers court to release property pending trial
  • passport is property
  • right to travel is fundamental
  • passport cannot be detained indefinitely
  • conditions can be imposed to secure presence
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2015 LawText (KAR) (06) 65

Criminal Petition No.7971/2014

2015-07-07

A.N.Venugopala Gowda

S. Vishwajith Shetty (for petitioner), B. Visweswaraiah (HCGP for R1)

Sri Mohammed Tasnim

State of Karnataka

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Criminal petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C. challenging orders rejecting release of passport seized during investigation.

Remedy Sought

Petitioner sought setting aside of orders dated 19.08.2014 and 29.11.2014 and release of his passport.

Filing Reason

Passport of the petitioner was seized by police in Crime No.214/2013; his application for release under Section 451 Cr.P.C. was rejected by the Magistrate and the revision was dismissed by the Sessions Judge.

Previous Decisions

Magistrate rejected application on 19.08.2014; Sessions Judge dismissed revision on 29.11.2014.

Issues

Whether the passport of an accused can be released under Section 451 Cr.P.C. pending trial? What conditions may be imposed to balance the accused's right to travel and the need to secure his presence?

Submissions/Arguments

Petitioner argued that passport is property and its detention is not justified; right to travel is fundamental. State opposed release contending that accused would flee from jurisdiction.

Ratio Decidendi

Passport is property and can be released under Section 451 Cr.P.C. pending trial. The right to travel abroad is a fundamental right under Article 21. The court must balance the right of the accused against the need to secure his presence. Conditions can be imposed to ensure the accused does not flee.

Judgment Excerpts

The petitioner is accused No.2 in Crime No.214/2013 of Udupi Town Police Station. Passport of the petitioner having been seized by the police, under PF No. 79/2014, an application was filed, under S.451 of Cr.P.C., before the learned Magistrate, for the release of the passport. Application having been opposed by the Assistant Public Prosecutor, learned Magistrate by being of the view, that the police have made out prima facie case and since the applicant/accused is working in a foreign country, rejected the application, on the ground that, if the passport is released, definitely, the accused will flee from the jurisdiction of the Court and would not be available for trial.

Procedural History

FIR registered in Crime No.214/2013; passport seized; application under Section 451 Cr.P.C. filed before JMFC, Udupi, rejected on 19.08.2014; revision before Principal Sessions Judge, Udupi, dismissed on 29.11.2014; present petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C. filed in High Court.

Acts & Sections

  • Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (Cr.P.C.): 451, 482
  • Indian Penal Code, 1860 (IPC): 406, 468, 471, 420, 34
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court High Court Dismisses Petition in Service Termination Case Due to Procedural Bars and Alleged False Caste Certificate. Termination upheld as advertisement specified post for reserved category only, and petition barred by 20-year delay and suppression ...
Related Judgement
Supreme Court Supreme Court Upholds Municipal Employee in Pay Scale Dispute Under Madhya Pradesh Municipalities Act, 1961. Accounts Officer's Reduction to Accountant Quashed as Rules Did Not Equate That Post, Entitling Employee to Absorbed Pay and Restoration of T...