High Court of Karnataka Confirms Removal of Chartered Accountant for Professional Misconduct in Audit of Great Western Industries Ltd. — Council's Recommendation for One-Year Removal Upheld Under Section 21(5) of Chartered Accountants Act, 1949.

High Court: Karnataka High Court Bench: BENGALURU In Favour of Prosecution
  • 6
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

This is a reference case filed by the Council of the Institute of Chartered Accountants of India under Section 21(5) of the Chartered Accountants Act, 1949, for consideration of the recommendation made by the Council for removal of the name of the respondent, S. Giridharan, a practicing Chartered Accountant, from the register of members for a period of one year. The background of the case is that a complaint was filed by the Superintendent of Police, CBI EOW, Chennai on 18.08.2006 before the Council alleging certain charges against the respondent with regard to the audit report and balance sheets signed by him as the statutory auditor of M/s Great Western Industries Ltd. (M/s GWIL) for the years ending 30.09.1998, 30.09.1999, and 30.09.2000. The respondent submitted his written reply on 26.02.2007, to which the complainant filed a rejoinder on 16.04.2007, and the respondent submitted his reply on 21.06.2007. Both parties were heard by the disciplinary committee of the Council. After concluding the hearing on 24.03.2010, the disciplinary committee submitted a report dated 10.06.2010 and recorded a finding that the respondent was guilty of professional misconduct within the meaning of Clauses (5), (6), (7), (8) and (9) of Part I of the Second Schedule to the Act read with Sections 21 and 22 of the Act. Copies of the report were given to the parties on 11.10.2010, and after considering their responses, the Council on 11.04.2011 accepted the findings and recommended removal of the respondent's name from the register for one year. The High Court, after hearing the parties, confirmed the finding of guilt and the punishment, holding that the respondent failed to exercise due diligence and discharged his duties in a manner not befitting a Chartered Accountant. The court dismissed the petition and directed that the name of the respondent be removed from the register of members for a period of one year.

Headnote

A) Professional Misconduct - Chartered Accountant - Audit Report - Clauses (5)-(9) Part I of II Schedule, Sections 21, 22 Chartered Accountants Act, 1949 - The respondent, as statutory auditor of M/s Great Western Industries Ltd., signed audit reports and balance sheets for the years ending 30.09.1998, 30.09.1999, and 30.09.2000. A complaint was filed by the Superintendent of Police, CBI EOW, Chennai alleging professional misconduct. The disciplinary committee found the respondent guilty under Clauses (5), (6), (7), (8) and (9) of Part I of the Second Schedule read with Sections 21 and 22 of the Act. The Council recommended removal of his name from the register for one year. The High Court confirmed the finding of guilt and the punishment, holding that the respondent failed to exercise due diligence and discharged his duties in a manner not befitting a Chartered Accountant. (Paras 1-5)

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the respondent Chartered Accountant is guilty of professional misconduct under Clauses (5), (6), (7), (8) and (9) of Part I of the Second Schedule to the Chartered Accountants Act, 1949, and whether the recommendation of the Council for removal of his name from the register for one year should be confirmed.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The High Court confirmed the finding of guilt and the punishment of removal of the respondent's name from the register of members for a period of one year. The petition was dismissed.

Law Points

  • Professional misconduct
  • Chartered Accountant
  • Audit report
  • Balance sheet
  • Disciplinary proceedings
  • Removal from register
  • Section 21(5) Chartered Accountants Act 1949
  • Clauses (5)-(9) Part I of II Schedule
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2015 LawText (KAR) (04) 65

Civil Petition No.191 of 2012

2015-03-05

Vineet Saran, S. Sujatha

S.S.Naganand, Vikram Unni, K. Kasturi, K.L.Shreenivasa

Chartered Accountants of India

Shri S Giridharan

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Reference under Section 21(5) of the Chartered Accountants Act, 1949 for consideration of recommendation for removal of name of respondent from register of members.

Remedy Sought

The Council of the Institute of Chartered Accountants of India sought confirmation of its recommendation to remove the respondent's name from the register of members for one year.

Filing Reason

The respondent was found guilty of professional misconduct in relation to audit reports and balance sheets of M/s Great Western Industries Ltd.

Previous Decisions

The disciplinary committee found the respondent guilty of professional misconduct under Clauses (5)-(9) of Part I of II Schedule read with Sections 21 and 22 of the Act. The Council accepted the findings and recommended removal for one year.

Issues

Whether the respondent is guilty of professional misconduct under Clauses (5), (6), (7), (8) and (9) of Part I of the Second Schedule to the Chartered Accountants Act, 1949. Whether the punishment of removal from the register for one year is appropriate.

Submissions/Arguments

The Council submitted that the respondent failed to exercise due diligence and discharged his duties in a manner not befitting a Chartered Accountant. The respondent argued that the findings were not justified and the punishment was excessive.

Ratio Decidendi

A Chartered Accountant who fails to exercise due diligence in auditing and signing balance sheets is guilty of professional misconduct under Clauses (5)-(9) of Part I of the Second Schedule to the Chartered Accountants Act, 1949, and the punishment of removal from the register for one year is appropriate.

Judgment Excerpts

This is a reference case filed by the Council of the Institute of Chartered Accountants of India under Section 21(5) of the Chartered Accountants Act, 1949 for consideration of the recommendation made by the Council for removal of the name of the respondent S.Giridharan, a practicing Chartered Accountant, from the register of members, maintained by it, for a period of one year. After concluding the hearing on 24.03.2010, the disciplinary committee submitted a report dated 10.06.2010 and recorded a finding that the respondent was guilty of professional misconduct within the meaning of Clauses (5), (6), (7), (8) and (9) of Part 1 of II Schedule to the Act read with Sections 21 and 22 of the Act.

Procedural History

Complaint filed by Superintendent of Police, CBI EOW, Chennai on 18.08.2006. Respondent submitted written reply on 26.02.2007. Complainant filed rejoinder on 16.04.2007. Respondent submitted reply on 21.06.2007. Hearing by disciplinary committee concluded on 24.03.2010. Disciplinary committee report dated 10.06.2010 finding respondent guilty. Copies given to parties on 11.10.2010. Council accepted findings and recommended removal on 11.04.2011. Reference filed to High Court under Section 21(5). High Court confirmed punishment on 05.03.2015.

Acts & Sections

  • Chartered Accountants Act, 1949: 21, 22, 21(5), 21(6)
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court High Court of Karnataka Confirms Removal of Chartered Accountant for Professional Misconduct in Audit of Great Western Industries Ltd. — Council's Recommendation for One-Year Removal Upheld Under Section 21(5) of Chartered Accountants Act, 1949.
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Allows Petition of Senior Clerk Challenging Transfer Order, Quashes Appellate Authority's Dismissal of Appeal for Non-Compliance with Natural Justice and Transfer Guidelines. The court held that the appellate authority's order was c...