High Court of Karnataka Confirms Removal of Chartered Accountant for Professional Misconduct in Audit of M/s Great Western Industries Ltd. — Council's recommendation for removal from register for one year upheld under Section 21(6) of the Chartered Accountants Act, 1949.

High Court: Karnataka High Court Bench: BENGALURU In Favour of Prosecution
  • 3
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

This is a reference case filed by the Council of the Institute of Chartered Accountants of India (the Council) under Section 21(5) of the Chartered Accountants Act, 1949 (the Act) for consideration of the recommendation made by the Council for removal of the name of the respondent, S. Giridharan, a practicing Chartered Accountant, from the register of members maintained by it, for a period of one year. The brief facts are that with regard to the audit report and the balance sheets signed by the respondent as statutory auditor of M/s Great Western Industries Ltd. (M/s GWIL) as on 30.09.1998, 30.09.1999 and 30.09.2000, a complaint was filed by the Superintendent of Police, CBI EOW, Chennai on 18.08.2006 before the Council alleging certain charges against the respondent. The respondent submitted his written reply on 26.02.2007, the complainant filed a rejoinder on 16.04.2007, and the respondent submitted his reply on 21.06.2007. The complainant and the respondent were heard by the disciplinary committee of the Council. After concluding the hearing on 24.03.2010, the disciplinary committee submitted a report dated 10.06.2010 and recorded a finding that the respondent was guilty of professional misconduct within the meaning of Clauses (5), (6), (7), (8) and (9) of Part 1 of II Schedule to the Act read with Sections 21 and 22 of the Act. Copies of the report were given to the parties on 11.10.2010, and after considering their responses, the Council on 11.04.2011 accepted the report and recommended removal of the respondent's name from the register for one year. The High Court, after hearing the parties, confirmed the finding of guilt and the punishment, holding that the respondent had failed to discharge his duties properly and was guilty of professional misconduct. The Court ordered removal of the respondent's name from the register of members for a period of one year.

Headnote

A) Professional Misconduct - Chartered Accountant - Audit Report - Clauses (5), (6), (7), (8) and (9) of Part 1 of II Schedule to the Chartered Accountants Act, 1949 read with Sections 21 and 22 - The respondent, as statutory auditor of M/s Great Western Industries Ltd., signed audit reports and balance sheets for the years ending 30.09.1998, 30.09.1999 and 30.09.2000. A complaint was filed by the Superintendent of Police, CBI EOW, Chennai alleging professional misconduct. The disciplinary committee found the respondent guilty. The Council recommended removal from the register for one year. The High Court confirmed the finding of guilt and the punishment, holding that the respondent had failed to discharge his duties properly and was guilty of professional misconduct. (Paras 1-6)

B) Disciplinary Proceedings - Council's Recommendation - Section 21(6) of the Chartered Accountants Act, 1949 - The Council of the Institute of Chartered Accountants of India made a reference under Section 21(5) of the Act for consideration of its recommendation for removal of the respondent's name from the register for one year. The High Court, after hearing the parties, confirmed the recommendation and ordered removal of the respondent's name from the register of members for a period of one year. (Paras 1-6)

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the respondent Chartered Accountant is guilty of professional misconduct under Clauses (5), (6), (7), (8) and (9) of Part 1 of II Schedule to the Chartered Accountants Act, 1949 read with Sections 21 and 22 of the Act, and whether the recommendation of the Council for removal of his name from the register of members for a period of one year should be confirmed.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The High Court confirmed the finding of guilt and the punishment of removal of the respondent's name from the register of members for a period of one year. The petition was disposed of accordingly.

Law Points

  • Professional misconduct
  • Chartered Accountant
  • Audit report
  • Balance sheet
  • Clauses (5)
  • (6)
  • (7)
  • (8) and (9) of Part 1 of II Schedule to the Chartered Accountants Act
  • 1949
  • Sections 21 and 22 of the Chartered Accountants Act
  • Removal from register
  • Disciplinary proceedings
  • Council of the Institute of Chartered Accountants of India
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2015 LawText (KAR) (03) 61

Civil Petition No.191 of 2012

2015-03-05

Vineet Saran, S. Sujatha

S.S.Naganand, Vikram Unni, K. Kasturi, K.L.Shreenivasa

Chartered Accountants of India

Shri S Giridharan

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Reference under Section 21(5) of the Chartered Accountants Act, 1949 for consideration of recommendation for removal of respondent's name from register of members.

Remedy Sought

Council of the Institute of Chartered Accountants of India sought confirmation of its recommendation for removal of respondent's name from register for one year.

Filing Reason

Respondent found guilty of professional misconduct in audit of M/s Great Western Industries Ltd.

Previous Decisions

Disciplinary committee found respondent guilty of professional misconduct under Clauses (5), (6), (7), (8) and (9) of Part 1 of II Schedule to the Act read with Sections 21 and 22; Council accepted report and recommended removal for one year.

Issues

Whether the respondent is guilty of professional misconduct under Clauses (5), (6), (7), (8) and (9) of Part 1 of II Schedule to the Chartered Accountants Act, 1949 read with Sections 21 and 22. Whether the recommendation of the Council for removal of respondent's name from the register for one year should be confirmed.

Submissions/Arguments

The Council submitted that the respondent was guilty of professional misconduct as found by the disciplinary committee. The respondent argued that he had not committed any misconduct and that the findings were not justified.

Ratio Decidendi

The respondent, as statutory auditor, failed to discharge his duties properly and was guilty of professional misconduct under Clauses (5), (6), (7), (8) and (9) of Part 1 of II Schedule to the Chartered Accountants Act, 1949 read with Sections 21 and 22. The Council's recommendation for removal from the register for one year was confirmed.

Judgment Excerpts

This is a reference case filed by the Council of the Institute of Chartered Accountants of India (for short ‘the Council’) under Section 21(5) of the Chartered Accountants Act, 1949 (for short ‘the Act’) for consideration of the recommendation made by the Council for removal of the name of the respondent S.Giridharan, a practicing Chartered Accountant, from the register of members, maintained by it, for a period of one year. After concluding the hearing on 24.03.2010, the disciplinary committee submitted a report dated 10.06.2010 and recorded a finding that the respondent was guilty of professional misconduct within the meaning of Clauses (5), (6), (7), (8) and (9) of Part 1 of II Schedule to the Act read with Sections 21 and 22 of the Act. We have heard Sri.S.S.Naganand, learned senior counsel appearing for the petitioner and Sri.K.Kasturi, learned senior counsel appearing for the respondent. In our considered opinion, the respondent has failed to discharge his duties properly and is guilty of professional misconduct.

Procedural History

Complaint filed by Superintendent of Police, CBI EOW, Chennai on 18.08.2006 before the Council. Respondent submitted written reply on 26.02.2007. Complainant filed rejoinder on 16.04.2007. Respondent submitted reply on 21.06.2007. Hearing by disciplinary committee concluded on 24.03.2010. Disciplinary committee submitted report on 10.06.2010 finding respondent guilty. Copies given to parties on 11.10.2010. Council accepted report and recommended removal for one year on 11.04.2011. Reference filed under Section 21(5) before High Court. High Court heard and disposed of petition on 05.03.2015.

Acts & Sections

  • Chartered Accountants Act, 1949: 21, 22, 21(5), 21(6)
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction for Murder Based on Circumstantial Evidence. Appellant convicted under Section 302 IPC for murder of deceased Raju, with conviction based on motive, last seen evidence, and recovery of weapon.
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Dismissal of Assistant Police Inspector Without Departmental Enquiry Under Article 311(2)(b) — Upholds MAT Orders. The Court held that the Commissioner of Police's order dispensing with enquiry was v...