High Court of Karnataka Quashes Proceedings Against Bangladeshi Hindu Woman Under Foreigners Act — Petitioner Entered India in 1995 Due to Religious Persecution and Has Been Residing Continuously Since Then

High Court: Karnataka High Court Bench: BENGALURU In Favour of Accused
  • 2
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The petitioner, Smt. Tapassi Das, a Bangladeshi Hindu, filed a criminal petition under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (Cr.P.C.) seeking quashing of the entire proceedings in C.C. No.3541/2014 pending before the III Addl. Civil Judge (Junior Division) and J.M.F.C. at Mysuru City for offences punishable under Section 14(1)(a) and (b) of the Foreigners Act, 1946. The petitioner was born in Rajbari District of Bangladesh. Her family members were victims of Islamic fundamentalism and atrocities against Hindus in Bangladesh. Her grandfather, late Mr. Bijoy Kumar Das, was shot dead by the Pakistan Army in 1971. The petitioner's house was looted by gangs of Islamic fundamentalists, and they were forced to pay Zaziya, a religious tax imposed on non-Muslims by jihadist outfits known as Razakars. Due to these circumstances, the petitioner and her family fled to India in 1995 without any valid travel documents. Since then, the petitioner has been residing in India continuously. The petitioner married Mrinmoy Biswas, an Indian citizen, and has been living in Mysore. The police registered a case against her under the Foreigners Act for entering India without a valid passport or visa. The court, after hearing the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Government Pleader, observed that the petitioner entered India in 1995 due to religious persecution and has been residing in India for over two decades. The court held that continuing the prosecution would be an abuse of the process of law and quashed the proceedings.

Headnote

A) Criminal Law - Quashing of Proceedings - Section 482 Cr.P.C. - Foreigners Act, 1946, Section 14(1)(a) and (b) - The petitioner, a Bangladeshi Hindu, entered India in 1995 without a valid passport or visa due to religious persecution. She has been residing in India continuously since then. The court held that continuing prosecution would be an abuse of process of law and quashed the proceedings in C.C. No.3541/2014 pending before the III Addl. Civil Judge (Junior Division) and J.M.F.C. at Mysuru City. (Paras 1-5)

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether criminal proceedings under the Foreigners Act, 1946 against a person who entered India without valid documents due to religious persecution and has resided continuously for over two decades should be quashed.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The court allowed the petition and quashed the entire proceedings in C.C. No.3541/2014 pending on the file of the III Addl. Civil Judge (Junior Division) and J.M.F.C. at Mysuru City for offences punishable under Section 14(1)(a) and (b) of Foreigners Act, 1946.

Law Points

  • Foreigners Act
  • 1946
  • Section 14(1)(a) and (b)
  • Section 482 Cr.P.C.
  • Quashing of criminal proceedings
  • Long residence
  • No travel document
  • No valid visa
  • Humanitarian grounds
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2016 LawText (KAR) (09) 29

Criminal Petition No.7352 of 2015

2016-09-16

ANAND BYRAREDDY

Vinod Kumar M, Chetan Desai

Smt. Tapassi Das

State of Karnataka, The Sub-Inspector of Police

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Criminal petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C. seeking quashing of proceedings under Foreigners Act, 1946.

Remedy Sought

Quashing of entire proceedings in C.C. No.3541/2014 pending before the III Addl. Civil Judge (Junior Division) and J.M.F.C. at Mysuru City.

Filing Reason

Petitioner, a Bangladeshi Hindu, entered India in 1995 without valid documents due to religious persecution and has been residing continuously since then. She was charged under Section 14(1)(a) and (b) of Foreigners Act, 1946.

Issues

Whether the criminal proceedings under Foreigners Act, 1946 against the petitioner should be quashed given her long residence in India due to religious persecution.

Submissions/Arguments

Petitioner argued that she entered India in 1995 due to religious persecution and has been residing continuously since then, and continuing prosecution would be an abuse of process. Respondent State opposed the petition.

Ratio Decidendi

The petitioner entered India in 1995 due to religious persecution and has been residing in India continuously for over two decades. Continuing the prosecution under the Foreigners Act, 1946 would be an abuse of the process of law, and hence the proceedings are liable to be quashed under Section 482 Cr.P.C.

Judgment Excerpts

The petitioner is a Bangladeshi Hindu. It transpires that she was born in Rajbari District of Bangladesh. The grandfather of the petitioner, late Mr. Bijoy Kumar Das, because of his strong religious belief, sentiments for their ancestral temple and attachment to the motherland, decided to stay in his ancestral village in Rajbari district of East Bengal. He was said to have been shot dead by the Pakistan Army in the year 1971. The petitioner and her family members were leading a precarious life. It is stated that they were called upon to pay Zaziya, which is a religious tax imposed on non-muslims by jihadist outfits knows as Razakars as and when there was a demand.

Procedural History

The petitioner filed Criminal Petition No.7352 of 2015 under Section 482 Cr.P.C. before the High Court of Karnataka at Bengaluru seeking quashing of proceedings in C.C. No.3541/2014 pending before the III Addl. Civil Judge (Junior Division) and J.M.F.C. at Mysuru City for offences under Section 14(1)(a) and (b) of Foreigners Act, 1946. The court heard the matter and passed the order on 16-09-2016.

Acts & Sections

  • Foreigners Act, 1946: 14(1)(a), 14(1)(b)
  • Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973: 482
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Upholds Acquittal in Murder Case Due to Inconsistent Dying Declarations. State's appeal against acquittal for murder under Section 302 IPC dismissed as dying declarations were contradictory and not corroborated by medical evidence.
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Unreliable Testimony of Interested Witnesses and Lack of Corroboration. Conviction under Section 302 IPC set aside as sole eye-witness was the wife of deceased and her testimony was not corrobor...