High Court of Karnataka Quashes Domestic Violence Proceedings Against Senior Citizen Mother-in-Law. Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005 cannot be invoked against a female relative who is not in a domestic relationship with the complainant.

High Court: Karnataka High Court Bench: DHARWAD In Favour of Accused
  • 4
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The petitioner, Smt. Shakuntala Beleri, a 78-year-old widow and senior citizen, filed a Criminal Petition under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, seeking quashing of Criminal Misc. No.165/2015 pending before the Civil Judge and JMFC, Mundargi. The said case was initiated by the respondent, Smt. Chaitra Shtar, who is the wife of one Manjunath Shettar. The respondent married Manjunath Shettar on 16.12.2013. Prior to the marriage, the petitioner had executed a Will dated 05.04.2013 bequeathing her properties in favour of Manjunath Shettar, treating him as a well-wisher. However, after the marriage, Manjunath Shettar allegedly changed his attitude and started neglecting the petitioner. The respondent filed a complaint under Sections 18, 19, 20, 22, and 23 of the Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005, against the petitioner and others. The petitioner contended that she was not in a domestic relationship with the respondent as defined under Section 2(f) of the Act, as she did not live with the respondent in a shared household. The High Court examined the definition of 'domestic relationship' under Section 2(f) of the Act, which requires that the persons live or have lived together in a shared household and are related by consanguinity, marriage, or adoption. The Court noted that the petitioner, being the mother-in-law, did not reside with the respondent and was not in a domestic relationship. The Court held that the complaint against the petitioner was an abuse of the process of law and quashed the proceedings against her. The petition was allowed.

Headnote

A) Criminal Procedure Code - Quashing of Proceedings - Section 482 Cr.P.C. - Abuse of Process - The High Court quashed proceedings against a senior citizen mother-in-law in a complaint filed by her daughter-in-law under the Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005, as the petitioner was not in a domestic relationship with the respondent and the complaint was an abuse of process of law. (Para 4)

B) Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005 - Domestic Relationship - Sections 2(a), 2(f), 18, 19, 20, 22, 23 - The Act defines 'domestic relationship' as a relationship between two persons who live or have lived together in a shared household and are related by consanguinity, marriage, or adoption. A mother-in-law who does not live with the daughter-in-law and is not in a domestic relationship cannot be subjected to proceedings under the Act. (Para 3-4)

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether a complaint under the Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005 can be maintained against a female relative who is not in a domestic relationship with the complainant?

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The petition is allowed. The proceedings in Criminal Misc. No.165/2015 pending on the file of the Civil Judge and JMFC, Mundargi, insofar as the petitioner is concerned, are quashed.

Law Points

  • Domestic relationship under Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act
  • 2005 requires shared household and relationship by blood
  • marriage
  • or adoption
  • Female relative not in domestic relationship cannot be proceeded against
  • Quashing under Section 482 Cr.P.C. for abuse of process
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2016 LawText (KAR) (06) 42

Criminal Petition No.100004/2016

2016-06-23

A.N.Venugopala Gowda

M M Patil (for petitioner), Jagadish Patil (for respondent)

Smt. Shakuntala W/o Totappa Beleri

Smt. Chaitra W/o Manjunath Shtar

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Criminal petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C. for quashing of proceedings under the Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005.

Remedy Sought

Petitioner sought quashing of Criminal Misc. No.165/2015 pending before the Civil Judge and JMFC, Mundargi.

Filing Reason

The respondent filed a complaint under Sections 18, 19, 20, 22, 23 of the Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005 against the petitioner and others.

Issues

Whether the petitioner, being a mother-in-law, can be proceeded against under the Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005 in the absence of a domestic relationship? Whether the complaint against the petitioner is an abuse of process of law?

Submissions/Arguments

Petitioner argued that she is not in a domestic relationship with the respondent as defined under Section 2(f) of the Act, as she does not live with the respondent in a shared household. Respondent contended that the complaint was maintainable against the petitioner.

Ratio Decidendi

The definition of 'domestic relationship' under Section 2(f) of the Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005 requires that the persons live or have lived together in a shared household and are related by consanguinity, marriage, or adoption. A mother-in-law who does not reside with the daughter-in-law is not in a domestic relationship and cannot be subjected to proceedings under the Act. Initiating proceedings against such a person amounts to an abuse of the process of law, warranting quashing under Section 482 Cr.P.C.

Judgment Excerpts

The factual scenario is, that the marriage of the respondent was solemnised with one Sri Manjunath Shettar, on 16.12.2013. The definition of 'domestic relationship' under Section 2(f) of the Act requires that the persons live or have lived together in a shared household and are related by consanguinity, marriage, or adoption. In the instant case, the petitioner is not in a domestic relationship with the respondent. Therefore, the complaint against the petitioner is an abuse of the process of law.

Procedural History

The respondent filed a complaint under Sections 18, 19, 20, 22, 23 of the Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005, which was registered as Criminal Misc. No.165/2015 before the Civil Judge and JMFC, Mundargi. The petitioner filed Criminal Petition No.100004/2016 under Section 482 Cr.P.C. before the High Court of Karnataka, Dharwad Bench, seeking quashing of the proceedings against her. The High Court allowed the petition on 23.06.2016.

Acts & Sections

  • Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005: 2(a), 2(f), 18, 19, 20, 22, 23
  • Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973: 482
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Dismisses Insurance Company's Appeal Against Rejection of Application to Set Aside Ex-Parte Award in Motor Accident Claim. Order 9 Rule 13 CPC Not Applicable to Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal Under Section 169 of Motor Vehicles Act...
Related Judgement
High Court High Court of Karnataka Quashes Domestic Violence Proceedings Against Senior Citizen Mother-in-Law. Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005 cannot be invoked against a female relative who is not in a domestic relationship with the compla...