High Court of Karnataka Quashes Lokayukta Enquiry Report and Recommendation in Disciplinary Proceeding — Violation of Natural Justice Due to Non-Supply of Documents. Petitioner's Right to Fair Hearing Violated as Adverse Material Not Furnished Despite Request.

High Court: Karnataka High Court Bench: BENGALURU In Favour of Accused
  • 1
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The petitioner, an Assistant Executive Engineer in the Karnataka Housing Board, was subjected to a disciplinary inquiry by the Karnataka Lokayukta on a charge of misconduct. The Additional Registrar of Enquiries submitted an enquiry report dated 26.10.2016, and the Upalokayukta made a recommendation dated 04.11.2016. The petitioner filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution seeking quashing of these documents. The core grievance was that the documents relied upon by the inquiry officer were not supplied to the petitioner despite his request, thereby violating the principles of natural justice. The High Court, after hearing the petitioner's counsel, found merit in the contention. The court observed that the failure to furnish the documents relied upon in the inquiry constituted a clear breach of natural justice. Consequently, the court allowed the writ petition, quashing the enquiry report and the recommendation. The court directed that the matter be remitted to the Lokayukta for fresh inquiry after providing the petitioner with all relevant documents and a reasonable opportunity of hearing.

Headnote

A) Administrative Law - Natural Justice - Disciplinary Inquiry - Non-Supply of Documents - Karnataka Lokayukta Act, 1984 - Petitioner challenged enquiry report and recommendation on ground that documents relied upon were not furnished to him despite request - Court held that failure to supply adverse documents vitiates the inquiry as it violates principles of natural justice - Held that the enquiry report and recommendation are quashed (Paras 1-3).

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the enquiry report and recommendation of the Lokayukta are liable to be quashed for violation of principles of natural justice on account of non-supply of documents relied upon in the inquiry.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

Writ petition allowed. Enquiry report dated 26.10.2016 (Annexure-P) and recommendation dated 04.11.2016 (Annexure-Q) are quashed. Matter remitted to Lokayukta for fresh inquiry after providing petitioner with all relevant documents and reasonable opportunity of hearing.

Law Points

  • Natural Justice
  • Right to Fair Hearing
  • Disciplinary Inquiry
  • Non-Supply of Documents
  • Karnataka Lokayukta Act
  • 1984
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2017 LawText (KAR) (01) 21

Writ Petition No.1831/2017 (GM-KLA)

2017-01-25

H.G. Ramesh, John Michael Cunha

Sri H.C. Shivaramu

Sri C. Krishnamurthy

State of Karnataka, Commissioner Karnataka Housing Board, Upalokayuktha, Additional Registrar of Enquiries-10

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution seeking quashing of enquiry report and recommendation of Lokayukta.

Remedy Sought

Petitioner sought quashing of enquiry report dated 26.10.2016 and recommendation dated 04.11.2016.

Filing Reason

Petitioner was subjected to disciplinary inquiry and the documents relied upon were not supplied to him, violating principles of natural justice.

Issues

Whether the enquiry report and recommendation are liable to be quashed for violation of natural justice due to non-supply of documents.

Submissions/Arguments

Petitioner argued that documents relied upon in the inquiry were not furnished to him despite request, violating natural justice.

Ratio Decidendi

Failure to supply documents relied upon in a disciplinary inquiry to the delinquent officer violates principles of natural justice and vitiates the inquiry.

Judgment Excerpts

In this writ petition, petitioner has sought for quashing of the enquiry report dated 26.10.2016 (Annexure-P) submitted by Additional Registrar of Enquiries-10, Karnataka Lokayukta, Bangalore, and also to quash the recommendation dated 04.11.2016 (Annexure-Q) of Upalokayukta, State of Karnataka. The petitioner was subjected to a Disciplinary Inquiry on the following charge... The learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the documents relied upon by the enquiry officer were not furnished to the petitioner despite his request. Hence, there is violation of principles of natural justice.

Procedural History

Petitioner filed writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of Constitution challenging enquiry report and recommendation of Lokayukta. Court heard preliminary hearing and allowed petition.

Acts & Sections

  • Constitution of India: Articles 226, 227
  • Karnataka Lokayukta Act, 1984:
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court High Court of Karnataka Allows Restoration of Suit for Partition Despite Abatement Order — Trial Court Erred in Holding Suit Abated When Legal Representatives Were Already on Record. The Court set aside the rejection of IA No.9 and directed restora...
Related Judgement
High Court High Court of Karnataka Quashes Lokayukta Enquiry Report and Recommendation in Disciplinary Proceeding — Violation of Natural Justice Due to Non-Supply of Documents. Petitioner's Right to Fair Hearing Violated as Adverse Material Not Furnished Desp...