High Court of Karnataka Enhances Compensation for Death of Driver in Motor Vehicle Accident - Multiplier Applied as per Sarla Verma Guidelines. The court corrected the multiplier from 13 to 18 and added 50% future prospects for a deceased driver aged 26 years under Section 166 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988.

High Court: Karnataka High Court Bench: BENGALURU In Favour of Accused
  • 1
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The appeal was filed by the legal representatives of M.N. Gangadhara, who died in a motor vehicle accident on 23.04.2009. The deceased was a driver employed at ANZ International Manufacturing Private Limited, earning Rs.6,000/- per month. The Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal awarded Rs.7,23,500/- as compensation. The appellants sought enhancement to Rs.20,00,000/-. The High Court found that the Tribunal had applied a multiplier of 13 instead of 18 as per the Sarla Verma guidelines, and had not added 50% towards future prospects. The court recalculated the loss of dependency as Rs.9,72,000/- (Rs.6,000 + 50% = Rs.9,000, minus 1/3rd for personal expenses = Rs.6,000, multiplied by 12 and by 18). Adding conventional heads of Rs.70,000/- (loss of consortium, loss of estate, funeral expenses) and medical expenses of Rs.3,000/-, the total compensation was enhanced to Rs.14,35,000/-. The appeal was allowed in part with interest at 6% per annum from the date of petition till deposit.

Headnote

A) Motor Accident Claims - Compensation for Death - Multiplier - The Tribunal erred in applying multiplier of 13 instead of 18 as per Sarla Verma guidelines for a deceased aged 26 years - Held that the correct multiplier is 18 (Para 4).

B) Motor Accident Claims - Loss of Dependency - Future Prospects - The Tribunal failed to add 50% towards future prospects for a deceased driver aged 26 years with a steady job - Held that 50% of the income must be added towards future prospects (Para 4).

C) Motor Accident Claims - Quantum of Compensation - The Tribunal awarded Rs.7,23,500/- which was enhanced to Rs.14,35,000/- by the High Court after applying correct multiplier and adding future prospects (Para 5).

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the compensation awarded by the Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal was inadequate and requires enhancement.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

Appeal allowed in part. Compensation enhanced from Rs.7,23,500/- to Rs.14,35,000/- with interest at 6% per annum from the date of petition till deposit.

Law Points

  • Motor Vehicles Act
  • 1988
  • Section 166
  • Section 173(1)
  • Compensation for death
  • Multiplier method
  • Loss of dependency
  • Future prospects
  • Sarla Verma v. Delhi Transport Corporation
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2018 LawText (KAR) (06) 30

Miscellaneous First Appeal No.4360/2012(MV)

2018-06-06

S. Sunil Dutt Yadav

Shripad V. Shastri (for appellants), L. Sreekanta Rao (for respondent 1)

V.S. Kanthamma @ Kanthamani, M.G. Somashekar (minor), N. Narasimha Murthy, Siddalingamma

The United India Insurance Co. Ltd., K. Alikutty

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Appeal against inadequate compensation in a motor accident claim

Remedy Sought

Enhancement of compensation from Rs.7,23,500/- to Rs.20,00,000/-

Filing Reason

The Tribunal awarded inadequate compensation for the death of M.N. Gangadhara

Previous Decisions

The Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal partly allowed the claim petition and awarded Rs.7,23,500/-

Issues

Whether the multiplier applied by the Tribunal was correct? Whether future prospects should be added to the income of the deceased?

Submissions/Arguments

Appellants argued that the Tribunal applied multiplier of 13 instead of 18 as per Sarla Verma and did not add 50% towards future prospects. Respondent Insurance Company opposed the enhancement.

Ratio Decidendi

For a deceased aged 26 years, the correct multiplier is 18 as per Sarla Verma, and 50% of the income must be added towards future prospects for a person with a steady job.

Judgment Excerpts

The Tribunal has applied multiplier of 13, whereas as per the decision of the Apex Court in Sarla Verma's case, the multiplier applicable for the age group of 26 to 30 years is 18. The Tribunal has not added any amount towards future prospects. As per the decision of the Apex Court, 50% of the income is to be added towards future prospects.

Procedural History

The claim petition was filed before the MACT, Bengaluru, which partly allowed it on 01.02.2012. The appellants filed this appeal under Section 173(1) of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, seeking enhancement.

Acts & Sections

  • Motor Vehicles Act, 1988: 166, 173(1)
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Allows Transfer of Undertrial Prisoner to Parent Jail for Convenience of Trial and Family Access. Transfer of undertrial prisoner without hearing is permissible as administrative act, but court directs transfer to Aurangabad Central...
Related Judgement
High Court High Court of Karnataka Enhances Compensation for Death of Driver in Motor Vehicle Accident - Multiplier Applied as per Sarla Verma Guidelines. The court corrected the multiplier from 13 to 18 and added 50% future prospects for a deceased driver aged...