High Court of Karnataka Quashes Proceedings Against Accused No.4 in K.P. Act Case for Lack of Sanction — Section 87 of Karnataka Police Act Requires Prior Sanction for Prosecution of Police Officers.

High Court: Karnataka High Court Bench: DHARWAD In Favour of Accused
  • 7
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The petitioner, Vageppa Gurulinga Jangaligi, was arrayed as Accused No.4 in C.C. No.3397/2019 pending before the IV Additional Civil Judge and JMFC, Athani, for an offence punishable under Section 87 of the Karnataka Police Act, 1963. The petitioner filed a petition under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, seeking quashing of the entire proceedings against him. The brief facts are that the petitioner is a police officer and the alleged offence under Section 87 of the K.P. Act was registered against him without obtaining the previous sanction of the State Government or the prescribed authority as required under Section 87 of the Act. The petitioner contended that the cognizance taken by the trial court was illegal and without jurisdiction. The State opposed the petition. The High Court examined the provisions of Section 87 of the K.P. Act, which states that no court shall take cognizance of an offence under the Act against a police officer except with the previous sanction of the State Government or the authority prescribed. The court found that in the present case, no such sanction was obtained before filing the charge sheet and taking cognizance. Therefore, the proceedings were quashed as being without jurisdiction and an abuse of the process of law. The petition was allowed.

Headnote

A) Criminal Procedure Code - Inherent Powers - Section 482 Cr.P.C. - Quashing of Proceedings - The High Court can exercise inherent powers to quash proceedings if the continuation of prosecution would be an abuse of process of law or to secure the ends of justice. (Para 1)

B) Karnataka Police Act - Sanction for Prosecution - Section 87 K.P. Act - Mandatory Sanction - Section 87 of the Karnataka Police Act mandates that no court shall take cognizance of an offence under the Act against a police officer without previous sanction of the State Government or the authority prescribed. (Para 3)

C) Karnataka Police Act - Offence under Section 87 - Applicability to Police Officers - The offence under Section 87 of the K.P. Act is alleged against the petitioner who is a police officer; therefore, prior sanction under Section 87 is mandatory before taking cognizance. (Para 3)

D) Criminal Procedure Code - Quashing - Lack of Sanction - Where the prosecution is initiated without the requisite sanction under Section 87 of the K.P. Act, the proceedings are liable to be quashed as the court lacks jurisdiction to take cognizance. (Para 3)

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the proceedings against the petitioner (Accused No.4) under Section 87 of the Karnataka Police Act can be quashed for want of prior sanction as required under Section 87 of the K.P. Act?

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The petition is allowed. The entire proceedings in C.C. No.3397/2019 pending on the file of IV Additional Civil Judge and JMFC, Athani, for the offence punishable under Section 87 of the Karnataka Police Act, insofar as the petitioner (Accused No.4) is concerned, are quashed.

Law Points

  • Section 482 Cr.P.C. inherent powers
  • Section 87 K.P. Act mandatory sanction
  • quashing of criminal proceedings for lack of sanction
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2019 LawText (KAR) (12) 9

Criminal Petition No.101997/2019

2019-12-10

P.G.M. Patil

Sri. Vitthal S. Teli (for petitioner), Sri. Rju Raghavendra (HCGP for respondent)

Vageppa Gurulinga Jangaligi (Jangalagi)

The State of Karnataka

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Criminal petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C. seeking quashing of proceedings in CC No.3397/2019 for offence under Section 87 of K.P. Act.

Remedy Sought

Petitioner (Accused No.4) sought quashing of entire proceedings in CC No.3397/2019.

Filing Reason

Proceedings were initiated without obtaining mandatory previous sanction under Section 87 of K.P. Act.

Issues

Whether the proceedings against the petitioner under Section 87 of K.P. Act are liable to be quashed for want of prior sanction?

Submissions/Arguments

Petitioner argued that no sanction under Section 87 of K.P. Act was obtained before taking cognizance, hence proceedings are illegal. Respondent State opposed the petition.

Ratio Decidendi

Section 87 of the Karnataka Police Act mandates previous sanction of the State Government or prescribed authority before taking cognizance of an offence under the Act against a police officer. In the absence of such sanction, the court lacks jurisdiction to take cognizance, and the proceedings are liable to be quashed under Section 482 Cr.P.C. to prevent abuse of process of law.

Judgment Excerpts

This petition is filed under Section 482 of Cr.P.C. seeking to quash the entire proceedings in CC No.3397/2019 pending on the file of IV Additional Civil Judge, Athani for the offence punishable under Section 87 of the Karnataka Police Act. Section 87 of the K.P. Act mandates that no court shall take cognizance of an offence under the Act against a police officer without previous sanction of the State Government or the authority prescribed. In the present case, no such sanction has been obtained before filing the charge sheet and taking cognizance. Therefore, the proceedings are quashed.

Procedural History

The petitioner filed a petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C. before the High Court of Karnataka, Dharwad Bench, seeking quashing of proceedings in CC No.3397/2019 pending before IV Additional Civil Judge and JMFC, Athani, for offence under Section 87 of K.P. Act. The petition was reserved for orders on 25/11/2019 and pronounced on 10/12/2019.

Acts & Sections

  • Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (Cr.P.C.): 482
  • Karnataka Police Act, 1963 (K.P. Act): 87
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Acquits Appellants in Murder Case Due to Lack of Credible Evidence. Conviction under Section 302 r/w 34 IPC Set Aside as Prosecution Failed to Prove Guilt Beyond Reasonable Doubt.
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Dismisses Revision Against Order Setting Aside Ex-Parte Decree in Suit for Possession and Mesne Profits. Court Holds That Sufficient Cause for Setting Aside Ex-Parte Decree Must Be Liberally Constructed Under Order 9 Rule 13 CPC.