High Court of Karnataka Quashes Dismissal Order in Service Dispute — Violation of Natural Justice. Dismissal under Rule 8(viii) of Karnataka Civil Services (Classification, Control and Appeal) Rules, 1957 without disciplinary inquiry held illegal.

High Court: Karnataka High Court Bench: DHARWAD In Favour of Accused
  • 2
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The petitioner, B.Y. Nilugal, an Assistant Executive Engineer in the Karnataka Housing Board, was dismissed from service by an order dated 25.06.2019 passed by the Commissioner for Housing and Disciplinary Authority (2nd respondent) under Rule 8(viii) of the Karnataka Civil Services (Classification, Control and Appeal) Rules, 1957. The petitioner challenged this dismissal order by filing a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India, seeking quashing of the dismissal order and reinstatement to his post. The court heard the matter and observed that the dismissal order was passed without conducting any disciplinary inquiry, which is a clear violation of the principles of natural justice. The court held that the dismissal under Rule 8(viii) without an inquiry is illegal and unsustainable. Consequently, the court allowed the writ petition, quashed the dismissal order dated 25.06.2019, and directed the 2nd respondent to reinstate the petitioner to his post as Assistant Executive Engineer. The court also directed that the petitioner be entitled to continuity of service and other consequential benefits, but not back wages.

Headnote

A) Service Law - Dismissal without Inquiry - Rule 8(viii) of Karnataka Civil Services (Classification, Control and Appeal) Rules, 1957 - Natural Justice - Petitioner, an Assistant Executive Engineer, was dismissed from service under Rule 8(viii) without any disciplinary inquiry - Court held that dismissal without inquiry is illegal and violative of principles of natural justice - Quashed the dismissal order and directed reinstatement (Paras 1-3).

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the order of dismissal from service passed under Rule 8(viii) of the Karnataka Civil Services (Classification, Control and Appeal) Rules, 1957 without conducting a disciplinary inquiry is sustainable in law.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

Writ petition allowed. The order of dismissal dated 25.06.2019 passed by the 2nd respondent is quashed. The 2nd respondent is directed to reinstate the petitioner to his post as Assistant Executive Engineer with continuity of service and other consequential benefits, but without back wages.

Law Points

  • Natural Justice
  • Dismissal without inquiry
  • Rule 8(viii) of Karnataka Civil Services (Classification
  • Control and Appeal) Rules
  • 1957
  • Articles 226 and 227 of Constitution of India
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2019 LawText (KAR) (11) 56

Writ Petition No.112000/2019 (S-DIS)

2019-11-29

P.B. Bajanthri

Sri. Jagadish Patil (for petitioner); Smt. Veeha Hegde (AGA for R1); Smt. Sharmila Patil (for R2)

B.Y. Nilugal

State of Karnataka, Department of Housing; Commissioner for Housing and Disciplinary Authority, Karnataka Housing Board

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Service dispute challenging dismissal from service

Remedy Sought

Quashing of dismissal order dated 25.06.2019 and reinstatement to the post of Assistant Executive Engineer

Filing Reason

Petitioner was dismissed from service under Rule 8(viii) of Karnataka Civil Services (Classification, Control and Appeal) Rules, 1957 without any disciplinary inquiry

Issues

Whether the dismissal order passed under Rule 8(viii) without conducting a disciplinary inquiry is valid.

Submissions/Arguments

Petitioner argued that dismissal without inquiry is illegal and violative of natural justice.

Ratio Decidendi

Dismissal from service under Rule 8(viii) of the Karnataka Civil Services (Classification, Control and Appeal) Rules, 1957 without conducting a disciplinary inquiry is illegal and violative of principles of natural justice.

Judgment Excerpts

In the instant petition, the petitioner has sought for the following relief: i) Quash the Order of dismissal from service dated 25.06.2019... The court held that dismissal without inquiry is illegal.

Procedural History

Petitioner filed writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of Constitution of India challenging dismissal order dated 25.06.2019 passed by the 2nd respondent under Rule 8(viii) of Karnataka Civil Services (Classification, Control and Appeal) Rules, 1957. The court heard the matter and allowed the petition on 29.11.2019.

Acts & Sections

  • Constitution of India: Articles 226, 227
  • Karnataka Civil Services (Classification, Control and Appeal) Rules, 1957: Rule 8(viii)
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court High Court of Karnataka Quashes Dismissal Order in Service Dispute — Violation of Natural Justice. Dismissal under Rule 8(viii) of Karnataka Civil Services (Classification, Control and Appeal) Rules, 1957 without disciplinary inquiry held illegal.
Related Judgement
Supreme Court Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Land Acquisition Lapse Case — Subsequent Purchaser Cannot Invoke Section 24(2) of the 2013 Act. The Court held that a person who purchases land after the acquisition process is complete has no locus standi to claim la...