Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal Regarding Alienation of Impartible Estate — Validity of Deed of Gift and Will Affirmed. Citing established legal principles, the court held that the holder of an impartible estate has the power to alienate properties by will, defeating the right of survivorship.

  • 1
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The dispute arose from a challenge to the validity of a deed of gift and a will executed by the father of the appellant, who was the Ruler of the former Mohanpur State. The father gifted properties to his youngest son and bequeathed others through a will. Upon the father's death, the appellant claimed that as the eldest son, he succeeded to the estate under the rule of primogeniture, arguing that his father lacked the power to alienate the estate. The Civil Judge initially ruled in favor of the appellant, declaring the deed and will invalid. However, the High Court reversed this decision, affirming the father's power of alienation. The Supreme Court, upon appeal, examined whether the holder of an impartible estate could alienate properties through a deed of gift or will. The court noted that the rule of primogeniture applied and that the estate was impartible. It referenced previous judgments establishing that the holder of such an estate has the right to alienate properties without restraint, as any restriction would contradict the custom of impartibility. The court dismissed the appeal, affirming the High Court's ruling and concluding that the appellants failed to prove any family custom prohibiting alienation. The court emphasized that the right of survivorship could be defeated by a will, consistent with established legal principles regarding impartible estates.

Headnote

A) Hindu Law - Alienation of Impartible Estate - Power of Alienation - Hindu Law - The holder of an impartible estate has the power of alienation not only by transfer inter vivos but also by will, even if such disposition defeats the right of survivorship of junior members. The court held that the concept of impartibility is a creature of custom, allowing the holder to alienate the estate without restraint, as long as no family custom prohibits such alienation (Paras 1115-1122).

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the holder of an impartible estate to which the rule of primogeniture applies can alienate the properties by a deed of gift or will.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The Supreme Court dismissed the appeal, affirming the High Court's ruling that the holder of an impartible estate has the power of alienation by will, even if it defeats the right of survivorship of junior members.

Law Points

  • alienation of impartible estate
  • rule of primogeniture
  • deed of gift
  • will
  • family custom
  • right of survivorship
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

1987 LawText (SC) (11) 34

Civil Appeal No. 2477 of 1972

1987-11-18

Dutt, M.M.

1988 AIR 247, 1988 SCR (1) 1110, 1988 SCC Supl. 133, JT 1987 (4) 455, 1987 SCALE (2) 1193

S.K. Dholakia, R.C. Bhatia, P.C. Kapur, B.K. Mehta, H.S. Parihar, N.D. Bhatti

Thakore Shri Vinayasinhji (Dead) by LRs

Kumar Shri Natwarsinhji & Ors

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Challenge to the validity of a deed of gift and a will regarding an impartible estate.

Remedy Sought

The appellant sought to declare the deed of gift and will invalid and regain possession of the properties.

Filing Reason

The appellant claimed that the father had no power to alienate the estate under the rule of primogeniture.

Previous Decisions

The Civil Judge initially ruled in favor of the appellant, but the High Court reversed this decision.

Issues

Whether the holder of an impartible estate can alienate properties by a deed of gift or will. Whether there exists a family custom prohibiting alienation of the estate.

Submissions/Arguments

The appellant argued that the father lacked the power of alienation due to the rule of primogeniture. The respondents contended that the deed of gift and will were valid and legal.

Ratio Decidendi

The holder of an impartible estate has the power of alienation not only by transfer inter vivos but also by will, even if such disposition defeats the right of survivorship of junior members.

Judgment Excerpts

The question involved for the consideration of the Court was whether the holder of an impartible estate to which the rule of primogeniture applies as an essential characteristic of such an estate, could alienate the properties comprised in the estate by a deed of gift or will. It must be held that the holder of an impartible estate has the power of alienation not only by transfer inter vivos, but also by a will even though the disposition by will may altogether defeat the right of survivorship of the junior members of the family.

Procedural History

The appellant filed a suit challenging the validity of the deed of gift and will, which was partially decreed by the Civil Judge. The High Court reversed this decision, leading to the appeal before the Supreme Court.

Acts & Sections

  • Hindu Law:
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court High Court of Karnataka Directs College to Issue Hall Tickets to Students for V Semester B.Com Examinations — Failure to Issue Hall Tickets Due to Non-Payment of Fees Held Unjustified. The court held that the right to education is fundamental and s...
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Allows Insurance Company's Appeal in Motor Accident Claim Cases — Reduces Compensation Due to Absence of Valid Driving Licence and Breach of Policy Conditions. The Court held that the Insurance Company is not liable to pay compens...