High Court of Karnataka Directs Medical Termination of Pregnancy for Rape Victim Under Medical Termination of Pregnancy Act, 1971 — Petitioner's Physical and Mental Health at Risk. Court Orders Medical Board Examination and Termination if Necessary, with Police Security and Counseling.

High Court: Karnataka High Court Bench: BENGALURU In Favour of Prosecution
  • 3
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The petitioner, a rape victim, filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India seeking a direction to the State of Karnataka and the Shivamogga Institute of Medical Sciences to medically terminate her pregnancy. The petitioner was allegedly raped and became pregnant. She approached the court because the pregnancy was beyond the statutory period for termination under the Medical Termination of Pregnancy Act, 1971. The court admitted the petition and heard it finally with consent. The court considered the petitioner's physical and mental health and the trauma she suffered. The court directed the respondents to constitute a medical board to examine the petitioner and, if found necessary, to terminate the pregnancy at the earliest. The court also directed the police to provide security and the Department of Women and Child Development to provide counseling and rehabilitation. The court disposed of the petition with these directions.

Headnote

A) Medical Termination of Pregnancy - Rape Victim - Direction to Terminate - Medical Termination of Pregnancy Act, 1971, Sections 3 and 5 - Petitioner, a rape victim, sought direction to respondents to medically terminate her pregnancy after obtaining expert opinion on her physical and mental health - Court, considering the trauma and risk to health, directed the medical board to examine and terminate pregnancy if found necessary - Held that the court can issue directions to protect the life and health of a rape victim (Paras 1-4).

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the court can direct the medical termination of pregnancy of a rape victim beyond the statutory period under the Medical Termination of Pregnancy Act, 1971, considering her physical and mental health.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The court directed the respondents to constitute a medical board to examine the petitioner and, if found necessary, to terminate the pregnancy at the earliest. The court also directed the police to provide security and the Department of Women and Child Development to provide counseling and rehabilitation. The petition was disposed of.

Law Points

  • Medical Termination of Pregnancy Act
  • 1971
  • Section 3
  • Section 5
  • rape victim
  • mental health
  • physical health
  • expert opinion
  • direction to terminate
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2019 LawText (KAR) (02) 57

Writ Petition No.375 of 2019 (GM-RES)

2019-02-04

Alok Aradhe

P.D. Subrahmanya, Y.D. Harsha

Miss S

The State of Karnataka, Department of Health and Family Welfare; Shivamogga Institute of Medical Sciences; The Officer-in-Charge, Jayapura Police Station; Department of Women and Child Development

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Writ petition seeking direction for medical termination of pregnancy of a rape victim.

Remedy Sought

Direction to respondents to medically terminate the pregnancy of the petitioner after obtaining expert opinion on her physical and mental health.

Filing Reason

Petitioner was a rape victim and became pregnant; she sought termination of pregnancy beyond the statutory period under the Medical Termination of Pregnancy Act, 1971.

Issues

Whether the court can direct medical termination of pregnancy of a rape victim beyond the statutory period under the Medical Termination of Pregnancy Act, 1971.

Submissions/Arguments

Petitioner's counsel argued that the petitioner was a rape victim and her physical and mental health required termination of pregnancy. Respondent's counsel (Additional Government Advocate) appeared for the respondents.

Ratio Decidendi

The court can issue directions to protect the life and health of a rape victim, including directing medical termination of pregnancy beyond the statutory period under the Medical Termination of Pregnancy Act, 1971, based on expert medical opinion.

Judgment Excerpts

The petition is admitted for hearing. With consent of the learned counsel for the parties, the same is heard finally. In this petition, the petitioner inter alia seeks a direction to respondent Nos.1 and 2 to medically terminate the pregnancy of the petitioner, after obtaining the opinion of the expert body of the doctors on the physical and mental health of the petitioner, at the earliest or in the alternative & etc.

Procedural History

The writ petition was filed on an unspecified date, admitted for hearing on 4 February 2019, and heard finally with consent of counsel.

Acts & Sections

  • Medical Termination of Pregnancy Act, 1971: 3, 5
  • Constitution of India: 226, 227
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Revenue's Appeal in Service Tax Case — Notification 8/2005-ST Held Conditional. CESTAT order setting aside demand against assessee upheld as notification required fulfillment of conditions for exemption.
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Impleadment of Landlord in Suit Against Demolition Notice Under Section 351 of BMC Act, 1888. Landlord's Direct Interest in Property Makes Them a Necessary Party Under Order 1 Rule 10 CPC.