High Court of Karnataka Quashes FIR Against School Management in Child Injury Case — No Criminal Intent Established. Incident of confetti spray causing eye injury to child in school bus does not attract Section 125(a) BNS, 2023 as there was no mens rea on part of school authorities.

High Court: Karnataka High Court Bench: BENGALURU In Favour of Accused
  • 61
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The petitioner, Divyajyothi School Management, represented by its Head Master A Jiby Anthony, filed a criminal petition under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (Cr.P.C.) read with Section 528 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (BNSS) seeking quashing of FIR No.94/2025 registered at Koppa Police Station, Mandya District for the offence punishable under Section 125(a) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 (BNS). The FIR was lodged by the second respondent, Smt. Shilpa Chandra Shekar, mother of a child studying in 4th standard at the petitioner's school. On 01.08.2025, while the child was travelling home in School Bus No.5, some other children allegedly carried and sprayed coloured confetti/sparklers inside the bus, and one such spray entered the child's eyes, resulting in loss of vision in one eye. The complainant alleged that the school management failed to ensure safety of children. The petitioner contended that the incident was a childish mischief or accident without any criminal intent on part of the school, and the FIR was an abuse of process. The High Court, after hearing counsel for both sides, observed that the incident appeared to be a childish mischief or fleeting accident that culminated in a calamity of lifelong consequence, but there was no material to show any intention or knowledge on part of the school management to cause such harm. The court held that continuing the proceedings would be an abuse of process of law and quashed the FIR and all further proceedings.

Headnote

A) Criminal Law - Quashing of FIR - Section 125(a) BNS, 2023 - Section 482 Cr.P.C / Section 528 BNSS - Mens Rea - The court examined whether an FIR for causing hurt by act endangering life or personal safety of others can be sustained against school management when a child's eye was injured by confetti spray by co-students in school bus. Held that the incident was a childish mischief or accident without any intention or knowledge on part of school management, and continuing proceedings would be abuse of process of law. (Paras 3-5)

B) Criminal Law - School Liability - Section 125(a) BNS, 2023 - Negligence - The court considered whether school management can be held criminally liable for an act of children spraying confetti in bus. Held that in absence of any overt act or criminal intent by school authorities, the FIR is liable to be quashed. (Paras 3-5)

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the registration of FIR for offence under Section 125(a) of BNS, 2023 against the school management for an incident where a child suffered eye injury due to spray of confetti by other children in the school bus is sustainable in law.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The petition is allowed. FIR in Crime No.94/2025 registered by Koppa Police Station, Mandya for offence under Section 125(a) of BNS, 2023 and all further proceedings are quashed.

Law Points

  • Criminal law
  • Quashing of FIR
  • Section 125(a) BNS
  • 2023
  • Section 482 Cr.P.C
  • Section 528 BNSS
  • Mens rea
  • Negligence
  • School liability
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2026 LawText (KAR) (06) 50

CRL.P No. 13718 of 2025

2026-06-23

M. Nagaprasanna

Sri. Nitin A M (for petitioner), Smt. Waheeda M M (HCGP for R-1), Sri. D.A. Shivakumar (for R-2)

Divyajyothi School Management, Rep. by its Head Master, A Jiby Anthony

The State of Karnataka, by Koppa Police Station, Rep. by State Public Prosecutor; Smt. Shilpa Chandra Shekar

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Criminal petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C. read with Section 528 BNSS for quashing of FIR

Remedy Sought

Quashing of FIR No.94/2025 registered for offence under Section 125(a) BNS, 2023

Filing Reason

Alleged incident of confetti spray causing eye injury to a child in school bus; school management contends no criminal intent

Issues

Whether the FIR for offence under Section 125(a) BNS, 2023 is sustainable against school management for an incident of children spraying confetti in school bus causing injury to another child.

Submissions/Arguments

Petitioner argued that the incident was a childish mischief or accident without any criminal intent on part of school management, and continuing proceedings would be abuse of process. Respondent No.2 (complainant) argued that the school failed to ensure safety of children, leading to loss of vision in one eye.

Ratio Decidendi

The incident was a childish mischief or accident without any intention or knowledge on part of the school management to cause harm. Continuing criminal proceedings would be an abuse of process of law. Hence, FIR liable to be quashed.

Judgment Excerpts

What may have appeared, at first blush, to be a childish mischief or a fleeting accident, allegedly culminated in a calamity of lifelong consequence: the child lost vision in one eye. Continuing the proceedings would be an abuse of the process of law.

Procedural History

FIR No.94/2025 registered on 05.09.2025 by Koppa Police Station for offence under Section 125(a) BNS, 2023. Petitioner filed CRL.P No.13718/2025 under Section 482 Cr.P.C. read with Section 528 BNSS for quashing. Heard on 23.06.2026 and allowed.

Acts & Sections

  • Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023: 125(a)
  • Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973: 482
  • Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023: 528
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
Supreme Court Supreme Court Dismisses Appellant in Indian Registration Act Case — Unregistered Agreement Reducing Rent Under Registered Lease Cannot Effect Variation. Document Varying Essential Terms Such as Amount of Rent or Royalty Must Be Registered Under Ind...
Related Judgement
Supreme Court Supreme Court Upholds Conviction of Wife for Murder of Husband Based on Circumstantial Evidence. Strained Relations, Prior Threats, and Medical Evidence of Strangulation Establish Guilt Beyond Reasonable Doubt Under Section 302 IPC.