Madras High Court Dismisses Writ Petition as Withdrawn in Cellphone Tower Installation Dispute — No Order as to Costs. Petitioner sought to forbid installation of a cellphone tower but withdrew the petition; court permitted withdrawal without adjudicating merits.

High Court: Madras High Court
  • 1
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The petitioner, M. Ramasamy, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India before the Madurai Bench of the Madras High Court, seeking a Writ of Mandamus to forbid respondents 1 to 6 (District Collector, Taluk Tahsildar, Block Development Officer, President of Kalloorani Village Panchayat, Superintendent of Police, and Inspector of Police) from permitting the seventh respondent, M/s. Ascend Telecom Infrastructure Pvt. Ltd., to install a cellphone tower on the property of the eighth respondent, Durairaj, located in Survey No.95/2 near Kamaraj Nagar South, Kalloorani Village, Tenkasi Taluk and District. The petitioner also sought a direction for an enquiry based on his representations dated 16.09.2024 and 16.12.2024. At the hearing, the learned counsel for the petitioner, Mr. B. Prahalad Ravi, sought permission to withdraw the writ petition and made an endorsement to that effect in the court bundle. The court, comprising Justice M.S. Ramesh and Dr. Justice A.D. Maria Clete, recorded the withdrawal and dismissed the writ petition as withdrawn. The court made no order as to costs and closed the connected miscellaneous petition. The judgment did not adjudicate on the merits of the case, as the petitioner voluntarily withdrew the petition.

Headnote

A) Constitutional Law - Writ of Mandamus - Withdrawal of Petition - Petitioner sought to withdraw the writ petition seeking to forbid installation of a cellphone tower - Court permitted withdrawal and dismissed the petition as withdrawn without adjudicating on merits - Held that no order as to costs is necessary (Paras 1-2).

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the court should grant the relief sought in the writ petition regarding installation of a cellphone tower.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The writ petition was dismissed as withdrawn. No order as to costs. The connected miscellaneous petition was closed.

Law Points

  • Withdrawal of writ petition
  • No adjudication on merits
  • No order as to costs
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2025 LawText (MAD) (01) 343

W.P.(MD)No.31546 of 2024

2025-01-06

M.S.RAMESH, A.D.MARIA CLETE

Mr.B.Prahalad Ravi (for petitioner), Mr.P.Thilak Kumar (Government Pleader for respondents 1 to 3)

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking a Writ of Mandamus to forbid installation of a cellphone tower.

Remedy Sought

Petitioner sought a Writ of Mandamus forbidding respondents 1 to 6 from permitting the seventh respondent to install a cellphone tower on the eighth respondent's land, and directing an enquiry on his representations.

Filing Reason

Petitioner objected to the installation of a cellphone tower near his locality and filed representations dated 16.09.2024 and 16.12.2024, which were not acted upon.

Issues

Whether the court should grant the relief sought in the writ petition regarding installation of a cellphone tower.

Submissions/Arguments

Petitioner's counsel sought permission to withdraw the writ petition and made an endorsement to that effect.

Ratio Decidendi

The court permitted the petitioner to withdraw the writ petition and dismissed it as withdrawn without adjudicating on the merits. No order as to costs was made.

Judgment Excerpts

Learned Counsel for the petitioner seeks permission of this Court to withdraw the present Writ Petition. Recording the same, this Writ Petition is dismissed as withdrawn. There shall be no order as to costs.

Procedural History

The petitioner filed W.P.(MD)No.31546 of 2024 along with W.M.P.(MD)No.26418 of 2024. At the hearing, the petitioner's counsel sought permission to withdraw the petition. The court recorded the withdrawal and dismissed the petition as withdrawn on 06.01.2025.

Acts & Sections

  • Constitution of India: Article 226
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court High Court of Karnataka Allows Appeal Against Single Judge Order Quashing Mutation Entry Based on Void Sale Deed. Land Belonging to Scheduled Tribe Cannot Be Alienated Without Permission Under Section 61 of Karnataka Land Revenue Act, 1964 and Sectio...
Related Judgement
High Court Madras High Court Dismisses Writ Petition as Withdrawn in Cellphone Tower Installation Dispute — No Order as to Costs. Petitioner sought to forbid installation of a cellphone tower but withdrew the petition; court permitted withdrawal without adjud...