Bombay High Court Quashes Cancellation of Hostel Recognition for Backward Class Students Due to Violation of Natural Justice. Show Cause Notice Lacked Specific Deficiencies and No Hearing Was Granted Before Cancellation Under Maharashtra Hostel for Backward Class Students Rules.

High Court: Bombay High Court Bench: NAGPUR In Favour of Accused
  • 18
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The petitioner, Sant Shankar Maharaj Ashram Trust, runs a hostel for students of backward classes with a sanctioned strength of 124 students. On 07.08.2016, an incident occurred where three cooks from a nearby institution allegedly attacked a minor student residing in the hostel. The Superintendent of the hostel informed the police on the same day, though an FIR was registered on 12.08.2016. The District Social Welfare Officer was informed on 08.08.2016. Based on this incident, the Chief Executive Officer, Zilla Parishad, Amravati, issued a show cause notice dated 14.10.2016 to the petitioner, but the notice did not specify the deficiencies on the basis of which action was proposed. Without granting any opportunity of hearing, the CEO passed an order dated 25.11.2016 cancelling the recognition of the hostel. The petitioner appealed to the Secretary, Social Justice and Special Assistance Department, who dismissed the appeal by order dated 27.01.2017, confirming the cancellation. The petitioner then filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court challenging both orders. The court observed that the show cause notice did not specify the deficiencies, and no hearing was given before cancellation, violating principles of natural justice. The court also noted that the petitioner had promptly reported the incident to the police and the social welfare officer, and the report of the District Social Welfare Officer did not attribute any negligence to the petitioner. The court held that the impugned orders were unsustainable and quashed them, directing restoration of recognition. However, the court granted liberty to the respondents to initiate fresh proceedings after giving due opportunity to the petitioner.

Headnote

A) Administrative Law - Natural Justice - Audi Alteram Partem - Show Cause Notice Must Specify Deficiencies - The show cause notice dated 14.10.2016 issued to the petitioner did not specify the deficiencies on the basis of which action was proposed to be taken, and the order of cancellation dated 25.11.2016 was passed without granting an opportunity of hearing to the petitioner. Held that the principles of natural justice were violated, rendering the impugned orders unsustainable. (Paras 4-6)

B) Social Welfare - Hostel for Backward Classes - Cancellation of Recognition - Maharashtra Hostel for Backward Class Students Rules - The petitioner trust was running a hostel for backward class students with sanctioned strength of 124. An incident of attack on a minor student by outsiders occurred, leading to cancellation of recognition. The court found that the petitioner had promptly informed the police and the District Social Welfare Officer, and the cancellation was based on a report that did not attribute any negligence to the petitioner. Held that the cancellation was arbitrary and violative of natural justice. (Paras 2-6)

C) Constitutional Law - Article 226 - Writ Jurisdiction - Quashing of Orders - The High Court, in exercise of its writ jurisdiction, quashed the orders dated 25.11.2016 and 27.01.2017, and directed restoration of recognition of the hostel, with liberty to the respondents to initiate fresh proceedings after giving due opportunity to the petitioner. (Para 6)

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the impugned order dated 27.01.2017 confirming cancellation of recognition of the petitioner's hostel for backward class students is sustainable in law, particularly when the show cause notice did not specify the deficiencies and no opportunity of hearing was granted before cancellation.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The writ petition is allowed. The impugned order dated 27.01.2017 passed by the Secretary, Social Justice and Special Assistance Department and the order dated 25.11.2016 passed by the Chief Executive Officer, Zilla Parishad, Amravati are quashed and set aside. The respondents are directed to restore the recognition of the petitioner's hostel. However, the respondents are at liberty to initiate fresh proceedings after giving due opportunity to the petitioner.

Law Points

  • Natural justice
  • audi alteram partem
  • show cause notice must specify deficiencies
  • opportunity of hearing before cancellation
  • recognition cancellation for backward class hostel
  • Maharashtra Hostel for Backward Class Students Rules
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2018 LawText (BOM) (12) 137

Writ Petition No.1027 of 2017

2018-12-12

Manish Pitale, J.

Mr. P.S. Chawhan for Petitioner, Mr. A.R. Chutke, AGP for Respondent Nos. 1,2 & 4

Sant Shankar Maharaj Ashram Trust, through its Secretary, Rajendra s/o Devidas Lunge

State of Maharashtra, Secretary Social Justice and Special Assistance Department, Chief Executive Officer Zilla Parishad Amravati, Commissioner Social Welfare Maharashtra State Pune, Shri Gurudev Samta Vastighur

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Writ petition challenging cancellation of recognition of a hostel for backward class students.

Remedy Sought

Quashing of orders dated 25.11.2016 and 27.01.2017 cancelling recognition, and restoration of recognition.

Filing Reason

The petitioner's hostel recognition was cancelled without proper show cause notice and without opportunity of hearing, violating principles of natural justice.

Previous Decisions

The Chief Executive Officer, Zilla Parishad, Amravati cancelled recognition on 25.11.2016; the Secretary, Social Justice and Special Assistance Department dismissed the appeal on 27.01.2017.

Issues

Whether the show cause notice dated 14.10.2016 specified the deficiencies on the basis of which action was proposed to be taken? Whether the order of cancellation dated 25.11.2016 was passed without granting an opportunity of hearing to the petitioner? Whether the impugned orders are sustainable in law?

Submissions/Arguments

Petitioner argued that the show cause notice did not specify the deficiencies and no hearing was granted before cancellation. Respondents argued that the incident of attack on a minor student justified cancellation.

Ratio Decidendi

The principles of natural justice require that a show cause notice must specify the deficiencies on the basis of which action is proposed, and an opportunity of hearing must be granted before passing an adverse order. Since the show cause notice did not specify deficiencies and no hearing was given, the cancellation orders are unsustainable.

Judgment Excerpts

The show cause notice dated 14.10.2016 did not specify the deficiencies on the basis of which action was proposed to be taken against the petitioner. The order of cancellation dated 25.11.2016 was passed without granting any opportunity of hearing to the petitioner. The impugned orders are quashed and set aside.

Procedural History

The Chief Executive Officer, Zilla Parishad, Amravati issued show cause notice on 14.10.2016 and passed cancellation order on 25.11.2016. The petitioner appealed to the Secretary, Social Justice and Special Assistance Department, who dismissed the appeal on 27.01.2017. The petitioner then filed Writ Petition No.1027 of 2017 before the Bombay High Court, Nagpur Bench, which was decided on 12.12.2018.

Acts & Sections

  • Constitution of India: Article 226
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Quashes Cancellation of Hostel Recognition for Backward Class Students Due to Violation of Natural Justice. Show Cause Notice Lacked Specific Deficiencies and No Hearing Was Granted Before Cancellation Under Maharashtra Hostel for B...
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Dismisses Second Appeal in Specific Performance Suit — Agreement for Sale of Agricultural Land Enforceable Despite Non-Agriculturist Purchaser. Section 89 of Bombay Tenancy and Agricultural Lands (Vidarbha Region) Act, 1958 Does N...