Bombay High Court Converts Murder Conviction to Culpable Homicide Not Amounting to Murder in Domestic Assault Case. Appellant-wife convicted under Section 304(II) IPC for causing death of husband during sudden quarrel, reducing sentence from life to six years.

High Court: Bombay High Court Bench: BOMBAY In Favour of Accused
  • 45
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The appellant, Smt. Parvati Nandkishore Taksalkar, was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Greater Mumbai, for the offence punishable under Section 304(II) of the Indian Penal Code and sentenced to six years rigorous imprisonment and a fine of Rs.500, with default sentence of six months. She appealed against this conviction and sentence. The case arose from an incident on 28th April 2013, when the appellant went to Powai police station and informed police officer Sushil Kumar Bhosale (PW1) that she had assaulted her husband Nandkishor with a tile and iron hammer during a quarrel caused by his intoxication. The police found Nandkishor with bleeding injuries; he was declared dead on admission to Mangal Hospital. Initially registered as an accidental death, it was later treated as homicidal and Crime No.242/2013 was registered under Section 302 IPC. The appellant was married to Ishwar Khandare earlier and had a son Satish from that marriage; she was living with Nandkishor as his wife. The prosecution case was that there were intermittent quarrels between the couple. The trial court convicted her under Section 304 Part II IPC, not Section 302. The High Court examined the evidence and found that the death was caused by the appellant's assault, but the act occurred during a sudden quarrel without premeditation, falling under Exception 4 to Section 300 IPC. The court upheld the conviction under Section 304 Part II IPC but reduced the sentence to the period already undergone (about 5 years 8 months), considering the appellant's gender, her young son, and the fact that she had already served a substantial part of the sentence. The appeal was partly allowed.

Headnote

A) Criminal Law - Culpable Homicide not amounting to murder - Exception 4 to Section 300 IPC - Sudden quarrel - The appellant assaulted her husband with a tile and iron hammer during a sudden quarrel arising from his intoxication. The court held that the act was done without premeditation and in the heat of passion, thus falling under Exception 4 to Section 300 IPC, making it punishable under Section 304 Part II IPC. (Paras 1-19)

B) Sentencing - Section 304 Part II IPC - Sentence of six years rigorous imprisonment - The trial court sentenced the appellant to six years RI and fine of Rs.500. The High Court upheld the conviction but reduced the sentence to the period already undergone (about 5 years 8 months) considering the appellant's gender, young son, and the fact that she had already served substantial sentence. (Paras 18-19)

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the appellant's act of causing death of her husband falls under murder (Section 302 IPC) or culpable homicide not amounting to murder (Section 304 Part II IPC) given the sudden quarrel and lack of premeditation.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

Appeal partly allowed. Conviction under Section 304(II) IPC upheld. Sentence reduced to the period already undergone (about 5 years 8 months). Appellant to be released forthwith unless required in any other case.

Law Points

  • Culpable Homicide not amounting to murder
  • Exception 4 to Section 300 IPC
  • Sudden quarrel
  • Knowledge without intention
  • Section 304 Part II IPC
  • Sentence reduction
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2018 LawText (BOM) (12) 169

Criminal Appeal No.823 of 2014

2018-12-17

Smt. Sadhana S. Jadhav

2018:BHC-AS:35006

Mr. Subir Sarkar for the Appellant, Mr. S.H. Yadav, APP for the State of Maharashtra

Smt. Parvati Nandkishore Taksalkar

The State of Maharashtra

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Criminal appeal against conviction and sentence under Section 304(II) IPC.

Remedy Sought

Appellant sought acquittal or reduction of sentence.

Filing Reason

Appellant was convicted for causing death of her husband by assaulting him with a tile and iron hammer during a quarrel.

Previous Decisions

Trial court convicted appellant under Section 304(II) IPC and sentenced to six years RI and fine of Rs.500.

Issues

Whether the conviction under Section 304(II) IPC is sustainable. Whether the sentence of six years rigorous imprisonment is excessive.

Submissions/Arguments

Appellant argued that the act was not intentional and occurred during a sudden quarrel. State argued that the conviction and sentence were appropriate.

Ratio Decidendi

The act of causing death during a sudden quarrel without premeditation falls under Exception 4 to Section 300 IPC, making it culpable homicide not amounting to murder punishable under Section 304 Part II IPC. The sentence can be reduced considering the circumstances of the case.

Judgment Excerpts

The appellant herein is convicted for the offence punishable under Section 304(II) of the Indian Penal Code and sentenced to suffer rigorous imprisonment for six years and fine of Rs.500/... The court held that the act was done without premeditation and in the heat of passion, thus falling under Exception 4 to Section 300 IPC.

Procedural History

Trial court convicted appellant on 16th October 2014 in Sessions Case No.810 of 2013. Appellant filed Criminal Appeal No.823 of 2014 before the Bombay High Court. High Court heard the appeal and delivered judgment on 17th December 2018.

Acts & Sections

  • Indian Penal Code, 1860: 302, 304(II), 300 Exception 4
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Converts Murder Conviction to Culpable Homicide Not Amounting to Murder in Domestic Assault Case. Appellant-wife convicted under Section 304(II) IPC for causing death of husband during sudden quarrel, reducing sentence from life to ...
Related Judgement
High Court Karnataka High Court Allows Writ Appeal Against Dismissal of Maintainability Challenge in Termination Dispute. Institution Recognised by Indian Medical Council Act, 1956 is Excluded from Karnataka Education Act, 1983, Rendering Tribunal Proceedings W...