High Court of Judicature at Bombay Bench at Aurangabad Considers Criminal Writ Petition Against State and Police Officials; Substantive Judgment Text Not Extracted. The available text lists petitioner and 75 respondents but omits legal grounds, relief sought, and final order.

High Court: Bombay High Court Bench: AURANGABAD
  • 0
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The available judgment text comprises only the cause title and party array in Criminal Writ Petition No. 211 of 2025 before the High Court of Judicature at Bombay, Bench at Aurangabad. The petitioner is Chandulal s/o Mohanlal Biyani, aged 60 years, occupation business, resident of Parli Vaijanath, District Beed. The respondents include the State of Maharashtra through the Government Pleader Office, Aurangabad, the Commissioner of Police, Nashik, and Superintendents of Police for Umarkhed, Umarga, Latur, Chhatrapati Sambhajinagar, Nanded, Beed, Jalna, Pandarpur, and Selu, followed by numerous private respondents numbered 12 to 75 with addresses across Beed, Latur, Nanded, Parbhani, Jalna, Solapur, Yavatmal, Dharashiv, Chhatrapati Sambhajinagar, and Nashik districts. The petition bears CNR No. HCBM030077612025 and was uploaded on 01/09/2026 with citation 2026:BHC-AUG:39507-DB. No further factual background, grounds, relief sought, arguments, legal issues, findings, or operative directions are present in the extracted text. Consequently, the substantive nature of the dispute, the sections or statutes invoked, and the court's reasoning cannot be determined from the available material. No prior procedural history is disclosed beyond the filing of this criminal writ petition. The case remains pending or its outcome is not stated in the available portion. The parties and their roles are identifiable only from the caption; no advocate names or presiding judge names are mentioned. No case law or statutory provisions are cited in the extracted text. Therefore, the available text is insufficient to summarize the legal controversy or the court's decision.

Issue of Consideration

CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO.211 OF 2025

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Case Details

2026 LawText (BOM) (08) 126

Criminal Writ Petition No. 211 of 2025

2026:BHC-AUG:39507-DB

Chandulal s/o Mohanlal Biyani

State of Maharashtra Through G.P. Office Aurangabad; The Commissioner of Police, Nashik; Superintendents of Police of Umarkhed, Umarga, Latur, Chh. Sambhajinagar, Nanded, Beed, Jalna, Pandarpur and Selu; Badrinarayan S/o Chaganlal Baheti and others (Respondent Nos. 12 to 75)

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Criminal writ petition before the High Court of Judicature at Bombay, Bench at Aurangabad.

Judgment Excerpts

CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO.211 OF 2025 Chandulal s/o. Mohanlal Biyani, Age: 60 years, Occ : Business, R/o. : Parli Vaijanath, Dist. Beed. .. PETITIONER

Procedural History

Criminal Writ Petition No. 211 of 2025 was filed before the High Court of Judicature at Bombay, Bench at Aurangabad. The available text does not disclose prior proceedings or final orders.

Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Madras High Court Dismisses Appeals Challenging Cooperative Society Election Notifications — Upholds Validity of Election Process Under Tamil Nadu Cooperative Societies Act, 1983. The court held that writ appeals against election notifications are ...
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Seeking Quashing of FIR in NDPS Act Case — Ignorance of Gazette Notification Not a Defence. Export of Controlled Substance Without NOC from Narcotics Commissioner Constitutes Prima Facie Offence Under Sections 9...