Bombay High Court Directs Removal of Encroachments Near Court Building and Bus Stand in Public Interest Litigation. Court Holds That Unruly Parking and Encroachments Causing Inconvenience to Litigants and Public Must Be Addressed by Competent Authorities.

High Court: Bombay High Court Bench: AURANGABAD
  • 2
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The petitioner, Raosaheb Mahadev Borade, a social worker and agriculturist from Georai, filed a Public Interest Litigation before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, seeking removal of encroachments and unruly parking in front of the court building and bus stand in Georai town. The petitioner contended that due to encroachments and haphazard parking of vehicles near the entry and exit gates of the court building, the public and litigants faced inconvenience and delay in accessing the court. The petitioner also sought removal of encroachments on the Aurangabad-Georai-Beed road, as well as removal of auto-rickshaw and private taxi stands in front of the ST bus stand and government offices. The learned counsel for the petitioner, Mr. C.V. Thombre, submitted that the Division Bench of the High Court had previously observed in similar matters that it would be open for the competent authority to take appropriate action. The respondents, including the State of Maharashtra, Collector Beed, District and Sessions Judge Beed, Executive Engineer PWD Beed, Tahsildar Georai, and Nagar Parishad Georai, were represented by the Assistant Government Pleader Mr. S.S. Dande. The court, after hearing the parties, disposed of the petition with a direction to the respondents to consider the petitioner's representation and take appropriate action in accordance with law within a period of four weeks from the date of the order. The court also directed that the petitioner be informed of the decision taken on the representation. The judgment was delivered by a Division Bench comprising Justice Prasanna B. Varale and Justice Mangesh S. Patil on 5 December 2018.

Headnote

A) Public Interest Litigation - Encroachment - Removal of Encroachments - The petitioner, a social worker, sought removal of encroachments and unruly parking in front of the court building and bus stand in Georai town, causing inconvenience to litigants and public. The court directed the respondents to consider the representation and take appropriate action in accordance with law within a specified period. (Paras 1-5)

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the encroachments and unruly parking in front of the court building and bus stand in Georai town cause public inconvenience and require removal by the authorities.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The petition is disposed of with a direction to the respondents to consider the petitioner's representation and take appropriate action in accordance with law within a period of four weeks from the date of the order. The petitioner shall be informed of the decision taken on the representation.

Law Points

  • Public Interest Litigation
  • Encroachment
  • Mandamus
  • Removal of Encroachments
  • Parking Regulation
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2018 LawText (BOM) (12) 31

Public Interest Litigation No.143 of 2018

2018-12-05

Prasanna B. Varale, Mangesh S. Patil

Mr. C.V. Thombre for petitioner, Mr. S.S. Dande (AGP) for respondent State

Raosaheb Mahadev Borade

The State of Maharashtra through Secretary, L & JD, Mantralaya, Mumbai; The Collector, Beed; The District and Sessions Judge, Beed; The Executive Engineer, PWD, Beed; The Tahsildar, Georai, Dist. Beed; Nagar Parishad Georai, Dist. Beed, through its Chief Officer

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Public Interest Litigation seeking removal of encroachments and unruly parking near court building and bus stand.

Remedy Sought

Writ of mandamus directing respondents to remove encroachments on Aurangabad-Georai-Beed road, in front of court building, bus stand, and auto-rickshaw/taxi stands.

Filing Reason

Encroachments and unruly parking causing inconvenience to public and litigants accessing the court building.

Issues

Whether the encroachments and unruly parking in front of the court building and bus stand in Georai town cause public inconvenience and require removal by the authorities.

Submissions/Arguments

Petitioner submitted that due to encroachments and unruly parking near entry and exit gates of court building, public and litigants face inconvenience and delay. Petitioner relied on an earlier Division Bench observation that competent authority may take appropriate action.

Ratio Decidendi

In a Public Interest Litigation, the court can direct the competent authorities to consider representations regarding encroachments and take appropriate action in accordance with law, without adjudicating the merits of the representation.

Judgment Excerpts

The learned counsel for petitioner thus submitted before us that on the backdrop of this grievance, the petitioner prayed for the basic prayer in the Petition and i.e. prayer clause 'B'... The learned counsel then submitted that in identical fact situation, the Division Bench of this Court was pleased to observe that it would be open for the concerned competent authority viz.

Procedural History

The petition was filed as a Public Interest Litigation. Rule was issued and made returnable forthwith. Heard counsel for parties. Petition taken up for final hearing with consent.

Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Madras High Court Quashes Detention Order in Drug Offender Case Due to Unexplained Delay — Live Link Snapped Between Grounds and Purpose of Detention. Preventive Detention Order Under Tamil Nadu Act 14 of 1982 Set Aside as Delay of 40 Days Between ...
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Directs Removal of Encroachments Near Court Building and Bus Stand in Public Interest Litigation. Court Holds That Unruly Parking and Encroachments Causing Inconvenience to Litigants and Public Must Be Addressed by Competent Authori...